Dec 162012

This is a post I shouldn’t write because it’s feeding the attention whoring of a woman who is going around to various MRA and MGTOW blogs, but it’s an important subject so I’m going to do so anyway.

I got this tweet sent to me earlier this week:

You may have already seen this FeminineMystiqueTWRA woman elsewhere on other MRA blogs.  Her name alone shows that she is a feminist.  The “TWRA” stands for “traditional women’s rights advocate” and being about any kind of “women’s rights” is an automatic red flag that she’s a feminist.  The “FeminineMystique” part is an obvious homage to Betty Friedan.  Her name is represents a merger of tradcon (traditionalist conservative) misandry and leftist feminist misandry.  This merger of different forms of misandry is the basis of her ideology.

Take a look at the blog post listed in the tweet, and you will see how she merges tradcon misandry and leftist feminist misandry.  She quotes both Germaine Greer and Amanda Marcotte as gospel.  She uses the former to “prove” that feminism benefits men and the latter to “prove” that the cause of divorce is selfish men who refuse to take care of women and children because men can supposedly get away with it.  (Of course, we know all these statements to be lies.)  It’s telling that FeminineMystiqueTWRA uses feminist sources to support her points while claiming to be “anti-feminist”.

FeminineMystiqueTWRA is also inspired by tradcon misandry.  She uses the standard tradcon canards of “Women are the real victims of feminism and not men”, “Men are forcing women to go to work against their will”, and “MRAs are feminists” because MRAs want equal rights.  (The idea that feminists want equal rights and not female supremacism is another lie of hers.)

What makes FeminineMystiqueTWRA different than any other tradcon woman we have encountered?  Most tradcon women wouldn’t quote and agree with liberal feminist women so easily.  While tradcon misandry is similar to leftist feminist misandry (since it’s all misandry), tradcon misandrists convince themselves that they are different from the leftist feminist misandrists and wouldn’t use them as inspiration like FeminineMystiqueTWRA does.  This makes FeminineMystiqueTWRA a bit unique and why I’m calling her a “Nazbol” misandrist.

I got the term “Nazbol” misandrist, from the Nazbol political party in Russia.  The Nazbols were formed a few years ago as a merger of Naziism and Communism.  (The name is literally “National Bolshevism”.)  While the Nazbol party was banned in Russia, it still exists as a faction in “The Other Russia” political party.  Both Naziism and Communism aren’t really that different as they are both forms of totalitarianism, but both sides are willing to fight each other to the death over their minuscule differences.  However, since both Naziism and Communism have been thoroughly discredited and marginalized, the only place either side has to go is to merge together which is why we have seen the formation of Nazbols in Russia.

Just as Nazis and Communists are both forms of totalitarianism with minuscule differences, so both tradcon misandrists and leftist feminist misandrists are both forms of misandry with minuscule differences.  That means sooner or later, we would see “Nazbol” misandrists that merged misandry from both the tradcon and leftist feminist variants.  That is what FeminineMystiqueTWRA has done making her the first “Nazbol” misandrist that I am aware of.  While I was expecting this to happen eventually, I am surprised that it happened so soon.  I didn’t think that mens rights had progressed enough for us to start seeing “Nazbol” misandrists.  I expected that it would be another decade at least before “Nazbol” misandrists appeared.  This means that mens rights is moving forward faster than any of us thought because “Nazbol” misandrists would only appear after mens rights is successful enough to force strains of misandry to merge.  We have been more successful so far than we thought.

Nov 252012

A great deal has been said about the results of the election earlier this month.  A lot of it is nothing but an attempt to spin the Republican Party into a manufactured crisis so it abandons its principles.  However, the Republican Party does need to solidify and expand its voter base somewhat if it doesn’t want to keep dealing with elections where the results are effectively a coin toss.  Most pundits will say that the only way for the Republican Party to expand its base are to make it more appealing to women and/or minorities.  Besides requiring the Republican Party to abandon its principles, that idea rests on two assumptions that aren’t true, that men and women from a minority group will always be politically unified and there are no other ways for the Republicans to get more votes.  There is a way for the Republican Party to work around all of this, and that is by openly supporting mens rights.

Women make up 56% of the American voting population, but they only make up approximately 51% of the population.  The gender breakdown of the American voting population should be approximately the same as the adult American population so why is it so different?  Why do more American men than American women choose not to vote?  Both the Republicans and Democrats cater to women so there is a large amount of men who have unconsciously realized that both the Republicans and the Democrats are hostile to their interests.  The Democrats are never going to try to reach out to these men so the Republicans should try and reach out to them.  The way for the Republicans to do this is by communicating to these men that the Republican Party will support their interests.  The only way for the Republican Party to do this is by supporting mens rights.  If the Republicans can get enough non-voting men to vote Republican so that women only make up around 51% of voters, this will guarantee that the Republicans will win the presidency and other national elections for the next several election cycles.

Supporting mens rights also provides the Republicans a way to reach out to non-white men and break up the women and minorities coalition.  Many people believe that women and minorities are all benefiting from government largesse.  This is not the case for minority men.  Affirmative action is a good example of this.  In many cases affirmative action only benefits “underrepresented minorities” which means Asian men do not benefit from it.  Minority men always lose out to minority women because minority women provide double the affirmative action benefit since they are both minority and female.  Minority men lose out to white women since women always have the edge in affirmative action.  If the Republicans can communicate to minority men that affirmative action and other government programs don’t benefit them, some minority men who previously voted Democrat will vote Republican.  Other minority men still won’t vote Republican, but knowing that the Democrats really are only supporting women will sour them on the Democrats.  Even though it won’t mean more votes for the Republicans, it does mean less votes for the Democrats which benefits the Republican Party.

Supporting mens rights gives the Republicans a powerful weapon against the “war on women” myth.  Anytime a Democrat says there is a “war on women”, Republicans can counter with facts about feminist abuses against men.  Anytime there is a commercial that says there is a “war on women”, the Republicans can produce a commercial showing how men lose their jobs, lose their children, and are falsely thrown in jail because of feminism.  Supporting mens rights allows the Republicans to counter the “war on women” myth with the message of “we’re defending freedom against the feminist/gynocentric police state”.  This messages allows the Republicans to contrast themselves as defending freedom and the facts against Democrats who are paranoid and concocting lies against men to setup a police state.

Will the Republican Party adopt this strategy?  Probably not.  The Republicans will probably think that they need to white knight for women more as a result of this election.  This will not work because in the end more talk like “binders full of women” cause their base and potential base to shrink..  It will also mean that the Republican Party will abandon its stated principles.  Supporting mens rights is the only way for the Republican party to keep its principles and win national elections.

Oct 212012

Whenever a politician is supportive of mens rights, even just a little bit, we should support that politician.  Gary Johnson, the former Republican governor of New Mexico is one such politician.  He is running on the Libertarian party ticket with Judge Jim Gray as his running mate.  Gov. Johnson is the only presidential candidate this year (including those candidates who didn’t make it past the primaries) to come out in support of any aspect of mens rights.  Here is a video of Gov. Johnson talking to Fathers and Families about fathers rights issues:

Gov. Johnson gets it when it comes to fathers rights.  In the video he doesn’t talk about other aspects of mens rights, but even if he is unaware of them, Gov. Johnson is likely to understand the issues and support mens rights.  For president this year I am going to be voting for the Johnson/Gray ticket.  Even though he has only talked about fathers rights, that puts him far ahead of anyone else running for president.

For what it’s worth (and it isn’t worth that much), I am endorsing Gov. Johnson for President of the U.S.

Oct 212012

My latest post for The Spearhead is up. As with all Spearhead posts comments are disabled so comment on the post at The Spearhead.

For anyone who cares about mens rights, voting can be problematic.  For a particular office the choices are often a feminist vs. a conservative female supremacist who is anti-feminist in name only.  As a result it is understandable that many MRAs would decide that voting is pointless.  However, for MRAs in the U.S. should vote this November for two reasons.

The first reason is that judges at the state level are often elected unlike federal judges who are appointed.  As was said by Dean Esmay at A Voice For Men, anti-family courts operate at the state level, and the courts that falsely imprison men for rape, abuse, or other crimes at state courts.  This means it is possible (depending on the state) to vote misandrist judges out of office.  Even if judges in a particular state aren’t elected, your vote for state offices can have a greater impact than your vote at the federal level.  In addition, in many states district attorneys and prosecutors are elected as well.  This provides the opportunity for MRAs to vote out misandrist prosecutors.  This will need to be a strategy used across multiple election cycles to make it work so the best thing is to get started in November’s election.  (A good place to start is with the information that Dean Esmay provided at A Voice For Men.)

The second reason to vote this November is to put a stop to the “war on women” myth.  As liberal politicians have become more dependent on the women’s vote, their pandering to women has reached a fever pitch with the myth of the “war on women”.  The only way to put a stop to this level of pandering to women is by voting against any and all politicians who say there is a “war on women”.  Vote for a conservative politician or a third party politician.  If there are no candidates for a particular office other than a politician invoking the mythical “war on women”, then write in “the war on women is a myth”.  It doesn’t matter which one you pick, as long as you register a vote that is not for a politician who says there is a “war on women”.  This will also need to be a strategy used across multiple election cycles so again it is best to start by voting this November.

If MRAs vote this November for these two reasons (and continue to vote with the same goals over the next several elections), then this strategy can have a real impact to roll back feminism and help men who would otherwise be in the cross hairs of feminist policies.

Cheap Jerseys Wholesale Jerseys Cheap Jerseys Wholesale Jerseys Cheap Jerseys Cheap NFL Jerseys Wholesale Jerseys Wholesale Football Jerseys Wholesale Jerseys Wholesale NFL Jerseys Cheap NFL Jerseys Wholesale NFL Jerseys Cheap NHL Jerseys Wholesale NHL Jerseys Cheap NBA Jerseys Wholesale NBA Jerseys Cheap MLB Jerseys Wholesale MLB Jerseys Cheap College Jerseys Cheap NCAA Jerseys Wholesale College Jerseys Wholesale NCAA Jerseys Cheap Soccer Jerseys Wholesale Soccer Jerseys Cheap Soccer Jerseys Wholesale Soccer Jerseys
Translate »