The Spearhead: The Repetitive Nature Of Shaming Language

female behavior, shaming language, the spearhead 1 Response »
Jul 202010

My latest post for The Spearhead is up. As with all Spearhead posts comments are disabled so comment on the post at The Spearhead.


Recently I wrote a post for my blog called “Facilitating Shaming Language” that among others things talked about a particular case of shaming language being used.  Here is part of a response that I received:

I’m sorry your mother didn’t love you. I hope you get help.

I just wrote a post about shaming language and how do my detractors respond?  With even more shaming language.  This is not an atypical response.  The Exposing Feminism blog which hosts a copy of the Catalog of Anti-Male Shaming Tactics received a similar response to the catalog from women that was also even more shaming language.

This tells us something important about shaming language.  It is repetitive.  While a user of shaming language might try to justify shaming language by claiming your behavior is “shameful”, the fact is shaming language can not be used to speak about your actual behavior.  The user of shaming language is just repeating the same thing over and over again with slightly different wording despite being exposed as ignoring facts.  It means that the user of shaming language is creating a strawman and not addressing their opponent’s ideas.

The Catalog of Anti-Male Shaming Tactics exists because of shaming language’s repetitiveness.  We get told the same things over and over again.  You have a small penis.  You are angry.  You make me feel afraid.  You’re a coward.  You won’t grow up.  You’re gay.  You need therapy.  Man up, etc.  Sure it may be worded somewhat differently, all shaming language is saying the same thing.  There are many ways to say, “you won’t grow up”, but it’s all the samel.

What we can learn from this is that we should not fear shaming language.  It does not and can never describe our actions or behavior.  The use of shaming language means by definition that our opponents have no real argument against us.  If they had a real argument against us, they would use it instead of shaming language.  Shaming language is the refuge of those who want to shut down legitimate debate and men who bring up reasonable questions and concerns.

Posted by Pro-male/Anti-feminist Tech at 1:30 PM

The Spearhead: We Should Not Worry About The NSA Or DHS

terrorism, the spearhead No Responses »
Jul 012010

My latest post for The Spearhead is up. As with all Spearhead posts comments are disabled so comment on the post at The Spearhead.

Last week a troll tried to claim that The Spearhead was being tracked by the Department of Homeland Security (or similar law enforcement/anti-terrorist entities).  This idea has appeared at various times in various places in this part of the internet.  We should not worry about the DHS or the NSA (National Security Agency) coming after us.

We must remember that we have no evidence that the DHS, NSA, or any other government agency is tracking us.  It is imperative that we base our actions on known facts not what someone or some group may or may not be doing.  While the Obama Administration’s focus on “domestic terrorism” is a source of concern for several reasons (many not related to this subject), we should not automatically have a bunker mentality.  We have nothing to hide.  We should not act like we do.  We are not a shadowy organization.  We are reasonable men (and a few reasonable women) with a reasonable position.  We need to be bold and out there speaking about the issues facing men.  Hiding in the shadows regardless of what some three letter government agency may be doing is no way to live.

It is doubtful that men’s rights and related ideas are on the radar screen of homeland security.  By the time that they are, it will be much more complicated than the DHS going after us.  There will be opportunistic politicians who will see the potential of developing a power base of men based of men’s rights.  That will make the idea that “MRA’s are a bunch of terrorists” much harder to be taken seriously.

On a personal level I have much more to lose than most of you here for speaking out about men’s rights.  Many of you know that I work in a job in the defense industry with a high level security clearance.  Various defense and homeland security government agencies have the right to search what I do online.  I could lose my job because of what’s on my blog or what I have written on The Spearhead.  The NSA could be tracking my online activities right now.  While I don’t know if the NSA is tracking me online or not, it does not matter to me.  I have and am going to continue to speak out about men’s rights like I always have.

I hope that the NSA or some other government agency is tracking me right now.  Why?  Because defense and homeland security agencies aren’t made up of anti-male robots.  They are made up of men like ourselves.  Like with any group of men there will be plenty of manginas and white knights.  But there will also be plenty of men working for these agencies who will be ready to hear our message.  Men who work for the NSA, DHS, FBI, ICE, etc. still go through the same things the rest of us do.  These men are no less likely to be ass raped in divorce court, to have their children taken away from them, to be the victims of paternity fraud, to have false rape charges and false sexual harassment charges leveled against them, etc.  If we are being tracked by a homeland security agency then after seeing are blogs and websites plenty of men working there will not think these guys are terrorists.  Many of them will instead remember how their aunt divorced their uncle for no reason and their uncle was reamed in divorce court or how their best friend lost their job because some woman decided she didn’t like him so she made up a bogus sexual harassment complaint against him.

Working in law enforcement or homeland security does not automatically make a man a mangina or a white knight.  These are men going through the same problems we are due to female supremacism, and we should remember that rather than treating them like a faceless hive.

Posted by Pro-male/Anti-feminist Tech at 7:36 AM

The Spearhead: Media Claims Terrorists Are "Unmarried Men"

future predictions, islam, terrorism, the spearhead No Responses »
Jun 142010

My latest post for The Spearhead is up. As with all Spearhead posts comments are disabled so comment on the post at The Spearhead.

Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch recently wrote about how the media is describing terrorism related news.  There was a recent arrest of two Muslim men at JFK Airport who were on their way to Somalia to allegedly take part in terrorist activities.  This arrest was reported by Reuters but Reuters did not say that these men were Muslim or point out the connection to wider Islamic terrorism.  Instead Reuters described the men as “men”, “unmarried American citizens”, and “residents of New Jersey”.

While Spencer covered how the media is ideologically against identifying these men as Muslim, he did not cover why the media chose to refer to these men as essentially “unmarried men”.  The media refused to describe the men arrested as Muslim because of their political correctness.  However, there are many ways Reuters could have written this.  Reuters chose “unmarried men” because of their anti-male and feminist ideology.  It makes it sound like the men arrested at JFK Airport were more like George Sodini than Mohammed or Osama.  It’s not just about hiding that it was Muslims involved in these arrests.  It’s an attempt to kill two birds with one stone by also trying to shift the blame on to men by implying that terrorism is caused by regular (unmarried) men who are American citizens.

The media like other feminist and anti-male ideologues see the average man as the problem not the guys who are actually flying planes into buildings.  Unmarried men are free of parts of the system that are designed to extract wealth from men such as the divorce court system.  There is a real threat that men will either go ghost in greater numbers or fight back in the future.  Expect to see more of this general blaming of men or unmarried men specifically in the future.

Posted by Pro-male/Anti-feminist Tech at 11:11 AM

The Spearhead: Misandry In The Depopulation Agenda Conspiracy Theory

conservative female supremacism, conspiracies, insanity, shaming language, the spearhead 1 Response »
Apr 302010

My latest post for The Spearhead is up. As with all Spearhead posts comments are disabled so comment on the post at The Spearhead.

There are many different types of conspiracy theories about many subjects.  However, most conspiracy theory you will encounter follows a “standard model”.  This “standard model” conspiracy theory usually includes some type of unified group of elites such as the NWO or the Illuminati.  In many “standard model” conspiracy theories you will find demons, reptile aliens, or grey aliens really running the show.  The “standard model” conspiracy theory almost always has some type of “depopulation agenda”.  The unified group of elites in the conspiracy theory want to reduce the population of the human race radically.  Various final population numbers such as 500 million and 1.2 billion are given.  The reason usually given that the unified group of elites supposedly want to eliminate that much of the human race is to better enslave the survivors.

The depopulation agenda conspiracy theory has quite a few problems.  The biggest is the lack of hard evidence.  The depopulation agenda is usually connected by a conspiracy theories to how feminist a society is, meaning that feminism is used to collapse fertility rates along with abortion and birth control.  However, no such correlation exists.  While feminized societies in the first world have seen their fertility rates collapse, this isn’t limited to places where feminism is prevalent.  Japan’s fertility rate collapsed without feminism.  Fertility rates even in the Islamic world have collapsed.  For example, thirty years ago Iran’s fertility rate was 9 children/woman. Now it’s 1.8. Feminism has no influence in the Islamic world.  Abortion and birth control aren’t used there either.  Yet fertility rates are collapsing in the Islamic world the same as they are in feminized countries.

Another problem is that events after a depopulation event historically do not happen the way the depopulation agenda conspiracy theory claims.  The black death was an event that caused depopulation.  After the black death the nobility was not able to tighten the screws on their populations.  In fact the opposite happened.  Wages and other compensation went up for the survivors.  This is consistent with supply and demand in economics.  There was a major drop in the supply of labor so compensation of the remaining laborers went up.  The elites that want depopulation would run into the same problem since they can’t annul the basic laws of economics.

However, all of those are side issues for us.  In the future the depopulation agenda conspiracy theory will be used as a vehicle of misandry against men.  So far it has only been used to attack feminism (and certain environmental issues).  When it has been used to attack feminism, its attack has only been on aspects of feminism related to abortion and birth control.  It’s fits in very well with conservative female supremacism which only attacks that portion of feminism and completely avoids what is happening to men.  Conservative female supremacists go as far to say that feminism actually benefits men and that women are the only “real victims” of feminism.  They will say that feminism “allows” to avoid “responsibility” in creating families and having children.  (Of course, this is absurd since there is no responsibility to create a family and/or have children, just to take care of the children you already have.)

Due to the misandry in churches, many men have left the churches.  On top of that due to marriage 2.0, many men are part of the marriage strike.  This extends into the churches as well.  Divorce is just as common in the church as outside of it.  That is one of the reasons for the fear that conservative female supremacist women have of not having enough children.  As we have seen, conservative female supremacist women and their white knights have not fixed the divorce system or created incentives for men to marry.  Instead they use more and more shaming language.  Since progressively using more and more shaming language isn’t have the effect they want they will need to up their shaming language.  The depopulation agenda conspiracy theory will allow them to do that.

The conservative female supremacist women and their white knights will claim that the marriage strike, men’s rights, MGTOW and related ideas are all part of the depopulation agenda.  Their “evidence” will be that men who have discovered these ideas aren’t getting married and having children.  They will try and club men over the head with the idea that we’re voluntarily following the Illuminati in their depopulation agenda and that we need to man up and get married and have kids to fight the Illuminati.  They will claim that the marriage strike, men’s rights, and MGTOW are Illuminati ideas to continue the depopulation agenda.  Whenever a man points out what a disaster marriage and many other things having to do with women have become, he will be told to “man up” because he’s failing to fight the Illuminati.  If a man is a victim of paternity fraud, the divorce industry, has his kids taken away etc. they will say that we all have to make sacrifices to fight the Illuminati.  Since the Illuminati is a fictitious concept, conservative female supremacists can ascribe whatever motivation they like to the Illuminati which they will use to claim that any man who isn’t obeying them is a tool of the Illuminati.

While many conservative female supremacist women and their white knights will use this form of absurd shaming language in the future, most of them will not completely believe it.  That does not matter to us.  Even though they may not believe it, they will still use it out of desperation.  While this will probably happen, it probably won’t be any more effective as other forms of shaming language are now.  If anything it will be less effective since in addition to sounding crazy, shaming language has been becoming less and less effective over time.

Posted by Pro-male/Anti-feminist Tech at 7:52 AM

The Spearhead: White Nationalism? More like White Knight Nationalism

false rape industry, insanity, the spearhead, violence No Responses »
Apr 252010

My latest post for The Spearhead is up. As with all Spearhead posts comments are disabled so comment on the post at The Spearhead.

As I have discussed before female supremacism isn’t limited to just feminism.  As we know there is conservative female supremacism and Islamic female supremacism.  There are a lot more than three forms of female supremacism.  White Nationalism is also a form of female supremacism.  White Nationalism promotes misandry by attempting to turn what would otherwise obviously be issues caused by misandry to issues of race.  It seeks to keep men of different races from working together and discovering how much they have in common.

Our own Ferdinand Bardamu had a post at his personal blog recently about a dustup at AltRight among the White Nationalist crowd there that laid bare the misandry inherent in White Nationalism.  As you can see from the link, White Nationalism is filled with women who except for the racial rhetoric sound like feminist, manginas, and (ironically) white knights.  Let’s look a few examples of the comments from the White Nationalist crowd at AltRight starting with this one:

Mr. Locklin, I do hope that your desire for foreign women won’t overshadow the white man’s duty to reproduce with his own racial group.

Other than the racial rhetoric this could have been written by a conservative female supremacist white knight.  Look at this one:

To broadly insult our mothers, sisters, wives, and daughters in this manner is tasteless. Both American women and men have some changing to do, changing we can do ourselves. But you’re doing what feels good for you and that’s what counts for you. Paradoxically, you’re the typical modern American man: empowered, sassy, sarcastic, and dedicated to gratifying yourself. You’re not loyal to the nation or interested in seeing it through to a restoration. You’re doing your own thang and won’t take no bojive from people who are offended when you insult them.

This is nothing but garden variety anti-male shaming language.  However, that doesn’t beat what a White Nationalist woman has to say:

Lock-load is an insulting cretin. As well as an utter moron. The article is loaded with errors. He shows two pictures of actresses. Lillian Gish was an American woman She had a career that spanned decades.This makes her a successful career woman – who succeeded in a business crawling with the Tribe. She would not have endured the juvenile insults of a pathetic, inadequate joke Lockloser for 2 seconds.

Neither would have Hedy Lamar – a woman that used her exquisite beauty to garner every type of material benefit imaginable. She was bi-sexual, and fled Nazi Germany, to serve the goalso of Die Jude, in America. Lockloser most likely would not have had enough cold hard cash to elicit her attention. Her idea of a dinner date would have included diamond bracelets, as hors d’ oerves.

Lockboor then includes the photographs of an assortment of foul Lesbians, and Jewesses, as representative of American females. Which they are decidely not. The promotion of every sort of denegeracy, in every American institution, is the work of the Franfurt School of Talmudic Jewry. The horrors of a degraded American, and global, womanhood, is the work of the Jew.

Lockinadequete-appendage rhapsodizes about the helpfulness of foreign females, and asserts that they aren’t as greedy and grasping. I suspect Lockmommy’sboy is exceptionally good at retaining his small hoard of cash, and resents the expenditure of the price of a hotdog, on a sidewalk stand, on any female – but if he thinks that foreign females are not materially obssessedm and greedier than George Soros – he’s still a virgin. Asiatics are the most soulless, heartless, absolutely ammoral hardheaded gold-diggers, that have ever befouled the Earth. Impovershed Eastern European females are not far behind. I have personally witnessed the very thorough skinning of every assett, of American White males, who have sought “submissive, demure” foreign brides. I have laughed in the faces, of those men, when they bemoaned their impovershment, and legal ravagement. They got what they sought, and they got what they deserved.

Finally – the White Nationalist movement is always whining about the absence of females. Gee – I wonder if snarky, snot-drenched attitudes, exemplified by Locksociallyretarded, have anything to due with this problem? Sorry, fellas – it’s not women that have to please you – you have to please, and lure in women.

Yup. It’s true. My 9 year old nephew has better social skills, than do 90% of you.

Gee, thanks, Richard Spencer, for publishing this insulting garbage. All this article has done is PISS OFF a lot of WN females.

I demand an apology. And a retraction.

Really – I do.

As a White American Woman. Who talks to a lot of other White American women. Who have HAD IT with snarky, juvenile, insulting socially-cretinous WN men.

This same woman wrote another similar comment:

Many, many of the comments reveal the precise nature of the problem – the boorishness, childishness, and social inpetitude of American males.

Once again, fellas – the onus is on YOU to please women. Not the other way around. Ghetto Negroes have better wooing, and flirtation skills, than so many White males. A lot of you guys are beyond pathetic. You really have nothing to offer females of any Race. A lot of you have very little money, and you are not as physically attractive as you flatter yourselves to be. To many of you – not all – but many – your attitude towards women is the most repellent aspect of your being. It’s not women – it’s you.

As anyone can see it’s all massive amounts of misandry and shaming language with some racial rhetoric thrown in.  The misandry inherent in White Nationalism goes deeper than a few comments on the internet.  Where did the false rape industry start?  It wasn’t with feminists.  The KKK (Ku Klux Klan) had their own version of the false rape industry white women would make false accusations of black men.  Drop the racial terms and it’s no different the the current feminist false rape industry.  Take a look at what happened during the Rosewood Massacre.  A woman lies about being beaten and raped and a random black man living in Rosewood gets lynched.  Then a massive battle between white men and black men happened where at least several men got killed.  Multiple men died all because a woman lied about rape, but the Rosewood Massacre is not properly recognized as being part of the false rape industry because race was involved.

The misandry in White Nationalism goes even farther than just incidents like the Rosewood Massacre.  The KKK had a corresponding group for women called the Women’s KKK or WKKK.  The WKKK is very similar to feminism both in action and language.  (Read the link for documentation of the similarities.)  All you have to do is drop the words white and black from WKKK language, and you end up with feminist language.

We have to remember that misandry is the central problem facing all men today.  That’s true regardless of what race a man is.  Men of all races have a great deal in common.  White Nationalism tries to hide that fact effectively acting as a vehicle for the promotion of misandry to benefit (white) women.  White Nationalism and other racist ideologies are misandarist and benefit no man.

Posted by Pro-male/Anti-feminist Tech at 12:47 PM

The Spearhead: Be Extreme And Unreasonable

the spearhead 2 Responses »
Apr 182010

My latest post for The Spearhead is up. As with all Spearhead posts comments are disabled so comment on the post at The Spearhead.

I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!
-Barry Goldwater at the 1964 Republican Convention

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-George Bernard Shaw

These two men have a lot to tell us.  Too often when talking about various issues that affect us we intentionally or unintentionally hold back or try to be at least somewhat politically correct.  This has not stopped any form of misandry from moving forward.  Instead we should be extreme and unreasonable for the reasons that Goldwater and Shaw point out.

You will not be able to win more women to our side by “toning down the rhetoric”, “being more politically correct”, etc. Most women aren’t going to want to give up the benefits they receive from misandry.  This is a fundamental problem, not the level of your rhetoric.  We have all seen women come to The Spearhead and other boards and tell us that we should “tone down the rhetoric” since women won’t listen.  These women claim to support us yet never do anything but criticize us instead doing something productive to solve these issues.  This is because they are really concern trolls and listening to concern trolls has not produced any results for us.

You will be accused of being a misogynist, sexist, having a small penis, being secretly gay, etc. regardless of what you say. You will be called names and told you have a small penis.  Get used to it.  It doesn’t matter how “politically correct” you are.  Unless you are a slave to misandarists they will try to shut you up by calling you names, claiming you’re secretly gay, and making claims about the size of your genitalia.  Using this technique to shut people up isn’t limited to us.  As this person from the Tea Parties points out, it doesn’t matter what he says as he will be accused of racism regardless.  Regardless of what the misandarists say about us, you need to keep going.  Beyond baseless accusations they don’t have many weapons that aren’t obvious totalitarianism which would prove everything we say about them is correct.

We are fighting for freedom. As Goldwater pointed out extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice.  Many of us have found ways to limit misandry in our own lives.  However, many other men aren’t so lucky, and if we ignore them eventually the misandarists will come for us.  There are men sitting in jail because of false rape charges.  There are men who have lost their jobs due to the sexual harassment industry, affirmative action, and other government policies to unemploy them (such as the recent stimulus).  They are men who are victims of paternity fraud.  There are men who have had their children taken away from them.  There are boys suffering under the jackboot of misandarist teachers.  There are boys being forced to take ritalin as young as 5 years old because they don’t act like girls enough.  Our colleges have turned into enclaves of anti-male totalitarianism.  As Welmer pointed out from the perspective of younger men this is starting to approach a real shooting war.  For those of us who are older and don’t have kids we don’t really know just how much totalitarianism younger men are experiencing and unless those of us who are older, they don’t have the same options for escaping it yet.

Extremism pulls the center in the direction we want. By being extreme we can produce a new center that is more of what we want.  This new center will thus look more reasonable than it did before.  This tactic has been used many times in history with success.  That includes feminists.  After all Andrea Dworkin’s ideas weren’t put into law, but it did allow other feminist ideas to look “reasonable” which allowed for the current misandarist state of the law we now experience.

Being extreme and unreasonable gives a voice to those men who are thinking the same things but afraid to speak up. Many men out there are thinking the same things we are.  However, they keep it to themselves because they’re afraid they are the only ones who have noticed what they know.  The success of misandry is dependent on many men believing that they are alone in their observations of the world.  We need to show them that there are many others who have the same ideas they do.

So go out and be extreme and unreasonable.  That’s how we will make progress against misandry.

Posted by Pro-male/Anti-feminist Tech at 9:36 AM

The Spearhead: Attention Whore Gets Angry At Her Success

female behavior, the spearhead No Responses »
Apr 072010

My latest post for The Spearhead is up. As with all Spearhead posts comments are disabled so comment on the post at The Spearhead.

Recently some women marched topless in Portland, Maine to protest for topless women being treated the same as topless men.  The march was organized by Ty McDowell who was enraged at the men who were attracted by the march.  This was despite the fact that some of the marchers posed for pictures.  McDowell is planning more marches where she will be more “aggressive” in “discouraging” men who she thinks are watching the marches too much.

This march was attention whoring because Maine law says that it is only illegal to show genitals in public.  In other words, it is legal in Maine for women to be topless (and this is why none of the women were arrested for marching topless).  There is no reason except attention whoring to march to treat topless women the same as topless men in Maine because legally that is already the case.  Since attention whoring was the purpose of this topless march, it is absurd for Ty McDowell to complain about men watching the march.

What Ty McDowell really wants is to be topless anywhere, but force men to not look at her while she is topless.  Like with so many things, Ty McDowell is a woman trying to have it both ways.  Either you’re in public and anyone can look at you or you’re not.  That’s the truth of the matter, and anything else is attention whoring.

Posted by Pro-male/Anti-feminist Tech at 12:16 PM

The Spearhead: Man Runs For Public Office Against His Wife

false abuse industry, male/female relationships, mancession, the spearhead No Responses »
Apr 062010

My latest post for The Spearhead is up. As with all Spearhead posts comments are disabled so comment on the post at The Spearhead.

In Missouri John Fischer has decided to run for the Missouri State Legislature to represent MO District 107.  He is running as a Republican against the current holder of that seat who is his wife, Linda Fischer, a Democrat.  They are the only two people running for this seat and the filing deadline has already passed so there will be no other candidates.

Linda Fischer claims her husband, a former employee of Chrysler who was forced into early retirement last May, has committed violence against her.  She has already gotten a protection order against her husband claiming that he has “harassed” her and has caused or attempted to cause her physical harm.  John Fischer denies the allegations and is willing to take polygraph test to prove his innocence.  The protection order has prevented John Fischer from entering his home so he is currently living in a camper.

Mr. Fischer says that he is not running against his wife because of the protection order but because of how the Democrats have handled the economy, health care, and the stimulus.  He said:

I figured if I’m going to be on my own, then I’m going to have to do what suits me. I’m standing up for people who lost their job. I don’t think they’re being represented fairly in this state because they do not take care of the working man.

This state legislature race is a microcosm of many of the issues that we write about, the mancession, the false abuse industry, etc.  John Fischer has not let all of the things his (presumably soon to be ex-) wife and the state have done to him stop him.  Despite being forced from his home, he is fighting back in his own way.

Posted by Pro-male/Anti-feminist Tech at 11:43 AM

The Spearhead: They Can't Have It Both Ways

conservative female supremacism, female behavior, the spearhead No Responses »
Mar 292010

My latest post for The Spearhead is up. As with all Spearhead posts comments are disabled so comment on the post at The Spearhead.

In the past I have talked about non-feminist (i.e. non-leftist) forms of female supremacism.  Something that all forms of female supremacism or misandry have is an attempt to have it both ways when it comes to women.  Women are “independent” yet are dependent of men either through the state (feminism) or marriage (conservative female supremacism).

I found a conservative female supremacist example of this at the [Non] Thinking Housewife:

I should say that I find the idea of a “men’s movement” not merely quixotic but wrong.

What is needed is a movement which places families at the heart of things

The feminist attack on masculine authority is not, at bottom, about misandry. It is about misanthropy, expressed through a demonic attack on the family. Its source is not really the desire to see men brought low, though that is necessary if Christian civilization is to be annihilated. It is much, much easier to believe otherwise, but I urge all men of a conservative bent to resist this self-flattering lie! Its source is a hatred of the feminine, borne of Satan’s fear of the Blessed Virgin

One of the great pretty lies that conservative female supremacists promote is the idea that feminism is an attack on “families” not men.  The hordes of men sitting in jail because of the false rape industry and the hordes of men who lost their job due to the sexual harassment industry and affirmative action and all the boys who had to suffer through female supremacist teachers can explain in detail why this is wrong.  You may ask if the conservative female supremacists want to destroy feminism wouldn’t they want to play up how men are being hurt by feminism?  They don’t because that would expose themselves as being minimally different than the feminists.  Since they can’t do that, they try to have it both ways by saying, “men are getting hurt but not really since they benefit from feminism so the real problem is an attack on ‘families’”.

What does it mean when conservative female supremacists say that feminists are trying to destroy “familes”?  They’re trying to claim that the “real victims” are women not men.  This is borne out of the fact that what conservative female supremacists are really worried about is the gravy train ending.  They’re worried that men are wising up and not going to be on the plantation anymore.  From that greedy and craven perspective, women are the victims despite the fact that it’s men who are losing their jobs, getting thrown in jail, etc.

Another commenter there wrote:

In my view, the Men’s Rights Movement (MRM) is even worse than the feminist movement. I say this because the mainstream feminist culture does believe in protecting and supporting women to some extent while the MRM is opposed to any support and protection of women. Indeed the MRM promotes equality between men and women to a radical degree, more so than typical feminists do. The MRM is very anti-family and anti-marriage, constantly talking about and promoting “the marriage strike” and producing websites like “Dump Your Wife Now.” They talk of how marriage is a bad deal for men and how men should avoid marriage at all costs. They are against child support as well; they seem to be against any imposition of responsibility upon men.

If there is one thing that Men’s Rights Activists (MRAs) hate more than anything else it is chivalry. Chivalry is the great enemy of MRAs because chivalry imposes responsibilities and duties upon men towards women

I am against feminism because feminism doesn’t protect women as well as patriarchy does. MRAs are also opposed to feminism but they are opposed to feminism because it offers too much protection to women in their view.

I have for a long time said that the argument between feminists and most conservative “anti-feminists” is really about how to best extract money and resources from men (i.e. arguing about how to hold the whip over men).  Outside of a few minor issues conservative female supremacists like the one I just quoted are in total agreement with feminism.  This proves what I have said more than anything else in such stark terms that I never thought I would actually see in writing.

Yes, MRAs (and others) are against the imposition of “responsibilities” on men.  That’s because it has a simpler name, slavery.  This conservative female supremacist is claiming that each individual man has “responsibilities” to women, not specific women but all women by the fact of his birth.  (This is no different than feminists who have created massive transfers of wealth from men to women via the state.)  This is slavery because these men did nothing to create these “responsibilities”.  They didn’t get married to all women.  They didn’t have children with all women.  If a man doesn’t get married and doesn’t have children then he has no family “responsibilities” in the manner the person above is describing.  This person I quoted should be happy about the marriage strike since men who are a part of the marriage strike are being responsible.  However, this isn’t about responsibility.  The person I quoted is worried that more and more men are figuring out the scam and avoiding it by not getting married.

If any of these conservative female supremacists really wanted marriage striking men to get married, then they would address these men’s concerns, namely the existence of no-fault divorce and the corrupt “family” court system.  This would solve the problem and all of those websites this person would complain about would go away.  To you and me that seems like the logical solution.  However, since this isn’t about solving real problems, but trying to get men back on to the plantation, we instead get nonsense about “responsibility” from the conservative female supremacists.  Plus, the logical solution would expose that women including conservative and religious women are a major part of the problem.  Right now people like the person I quoted try to have it both ways by saying divorce is a sin but divorce is all the man’s fault for failing to show “leadership” or “responsibility” which is just a way to avoid placing the responsibility for divorce where it belongs, on women.  This is especially true since women file for most divorces.

The person I quoted also claims that women are in need of “protection”.  That brings up the question of whether women are really adults or children.  If women need “protection” then they’re children and should be treated like children.  If women are adults then they don’t need “protection” and should be held responsible for their actions.  I’m not going to argue either side of this question except to say that the person above like all female supremacists tries to have it both ways.  Either women are adults or children.  Instead what this person is promoting a hybrid that enslaves men.  That is trying to have it both ways.

Posted by Pro-male/Anti-feminist Tech at 12:51 PM

The Spearhead: Jihad Jane and Jihad Jamie

female behavior, islam, terrorism, the spearhead, violence No Responses »
Mar 162010

My latest post for The Spearhead is up. As with all Spearhead posts comments are disabled so comment on the post at The Spearhead.

Usually, when we think terrorists, we think of men.  However, there are women terrorists too.  And they aren’t just coming from the Middle East.  Colleen LaRose, a middle aged divorced woman from Pennsylvania who went by the name “Jihad Jane” and “Fatima LaRose” online, was arrested for conspiring with other terrorists to assassinate Swedish artist, Lars Vilks.  (Lars Vilks is the artist who created the cartoon of Muhammad as a dog.)  LaRose traveled to Europe last year to train with and assist other terrorists in their plot to kill Vilks.  She was arrested when she arrived back in the US.

LaRose’s arrest was due to the work of the Jawa Report and Youtube Smackdown who have been tracking supporters of terrorism on Youtube and twitter and having their videos on Youtube flagged for removal.  She spent a lot of time on Youtube where these groups discovered her calls for violent jihad on Youtube and her use of twitter to raise funds for terrorists.  You can read more about how LaRose was tracked on Youtube from the Jawa Report.  In that link, the Jawa Report has described LaRose as a “middle aged sociopath woman desperate for love, lonely and isolated”.  The Jawa Report has more about LaRose here.

It turns out LaRose wasn’t the only American woman involved in this terrorist plot to murder Vilks.  Jamie Paulin-Ramirez, a 31 year old medical assistant, originally from Colorado, was arrested recently with several others involved in this plot.  She was later freed, but still may face charges.  Ramirez’s story is somewhat similar to LaRose’s.  Last year Ramirez started spending a lot of time in Muslim chat rooms where she met LaRose and other extremists. In September, she left the US for Ireland to marry an Algerian man taking her son with her.

This is a still developing story.  Originally, when I was going to write this post for The Spearhead there was only one American woman identified in this terrorist plot.  We’ll see what happens.

Posted by Pro-male/Anti-feminist Tech at 6:21 AM
Older Entries
© 2010 Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Technology Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha