Apr 072014
 

This article at the New York Times is the latest hit piece on men working in the tech industry.  While it would take weeks to fully document the misandry in that article, one thing of note in the article and its comments were the attacks on startups.  In contrast, large companies and government were glorified along with their HR departments:

Dear Women: come to Microsoft, to IBM, to Cisco, to Apple or even to Google/Facebook. We are “dinosaurs” (which means that we have been around for many years) and we actually have an HR department and diversity policies. The older ones among us (Microsoft, IBM, Cisco) are not liked by the macho and libertarian TechCrunch crowd – just like older people are hated by the “cool” young ones.

It’s the same with this comment:

Now, my daughter’s attitude is that she wouldn’t be caught dead applying to jobs with hi tech companies in Silicon Valley. She is repelled by what she hears about the corporate culture – and her impression that it’s filled with people like her classmates. Instead, she wants to work for governmental agencies or companies that she feels are run by “grown ups” such as IBM. This attitude is becoming widespread among female CS majors. I think it’s pretty sad that the best and brightest young women in the CS field are writing off big segments of the tech world as potential employers. These companies better act and act quickly.

The article admits that tech startups are the most innovative part of the economy.  They are not experiencing a loss because women are taking jobs in large corporations and the government.  TFH pointed out that sectors of the economy that employ women are all known for their low productivity.  They are also known for their lack of innovation.  This is not a coincidence.

If women were so vital for success tech startups would be failing left and right, but that isn’t happening.  Instead startups are providing men in the tech industry an escape hatch from working at large corporations and the government.  On top of that startups have made lots of men rich outside of the control of women and the feminine imperative.  Men who work at startups are effectively GTOW with respect to employment.  Their productivity is benefiting themselves and not women working in useless jobs like HR and diversity officers.

The reason why we see this article attacking startups and Obamacare attempting to make it harder to form startups is because it is in women’s interests to see men forced to work in large corporations and the government.  Men are not serving the feminine imperative when they work at a startup.  I also suspect there’s a fear that startups will spread beyond the tech industry.  If other industries have a startup ecosystem, even more me will be able to keep their productivity for themselves.  Startups aren’t just a threat to the feminine imperative in the tech industry.  They are a threat to the feminine imperative in every industry.

Feb 192014
 

Both The Spearhead and AVFM have covered what happened to the MGTOW Forums.  MGTOW Forums looks to be back in some form although there has been nothing new since 2/11 so I suspect it’s only an archive.

There are plenty of other MGTOW and related forums around.  Some are new.  Some have been around for a while.  Here’s a list:

  1. Happy Bachelors
  2. MGTOW HQ
  3. Going Your Own Way
  4. MGTOW.net
Oct 312013
 

My latest post for The Spearhead is up. As with all Spearhead posts comments are disabled so comment on the post at The Spearhead.

This year there is an election for governor in the state of Virginia.  The two main candidates are Terry McAuliffe, the Democrat, and Ken Cuccinelli, the Republican.  Terry McAuliffe is known for being a major Democratic party fundraiser and has a long history of questionable business dealings.  McAuliffe has no real platform so his campaign has resorted to using the mythical “war on women” to attack Cuccinelli with most of his attacks focused on abortion and birth control.

Invoking the nonexistent “war on women” is par for the course for Democrats.  What is unique about McAuliffe campaign’s use of this tactic is that they are trying to connect Cuccinelli to fathers’ rights groups.  Here is an example:

The “leader” of the fathers’ rights movement that Cuccinelli was representing was Ron Gringnol Jr., a former Virginia House of Delegates candidate, who was in a custody dispute with his ex-wife.  Cuccinelli only “took time off” from being Attorney General because he was closing out the case from his private practice before being Attorney General, and the case was scheduled to be in court two weeks after he was sworn in as AG of Virginia.  What this boils down to is that Cuccinelli was simply representing a man who wanted to see his children.  He was representing a man who wanted to be a father to his children.

Terry McAuliffe does not understand men who want to be fathers to their kids since he doesn’t care about being a father.  When one of his kids was being born, McAuliffe left his wife in the hospital to attend a fundraiser for the Democratic Party.  When McAuliffe’s son Peter was born, McAuliffe stopped for another fundraiser while taking his wife and his newborn son home from the hospital.  When McAuliffe’s son Jack was being born, McAuliffe thought it was more important to argue with the anesthesiologist and obstetrician involved with his son’s birth about socialized medicine than to just be there for his wife and newborn son.

While it’s clear that Terry McAuliffe hates fathers to the point of not caring about being a father to his own kids, the views of his supporters on fathers are worse.  The graphic shown above was posted to facebook, and here is the response from one of McAuliffe’s supporters:

I do not know him personally but any man who would delve into a womans issue such as child bearing and raising children is obviously insane.

This woman is saying that any man who wants to be a father to their children is insane.  She believes that fatherhood should not exist (although it’s safe to assume that she doesn’t want to give up the gravy train of men paying child support).

To cover up McAuliffe’s deficiencies as a candidate for governor, his campaign has run the most anti-father (and anti-male) campaign in American history.  Polls currently show that McAuliffe has a very comfortable lead over Cuccinelli.  While there are other issues involved such as the recent government shutdown, this shows that McAuliffe’s anti-father bigotry resonates with a section of the electorate.  The end result of McAuliffe getting elected will be than even more young men will decide that it’s too dangerous to become a father and to go their own way.

Jun 292013
 

Every so often, a man in this part of the internet decides to give up on the M(H)RM or MGTOW.  Usually, it’s because of a (perceived) lack of progress in rolling back feminism to the point where such men declare that rolling back feminism can never happen.  Paul Elam had a good response to such men:

And now we have started building a better option for ourselves with the MHRM and MGTOW. That is what pissed me about this. It is happening right in front of him, but not on his schedule, so he is going to whine.

This is what it’s really all about it.  It’s not happening on their schedule (or in their way) so they whine about it.  Yes, the progress being made in rolling back feminism is happening very slowly right now.  It’s understandable to be frustrated about this.  (I wish more progress was being made too.)  However, it is happening.  Once the M(H)RM, MGTOW, and/or other anti-feminist (and de-facto anti-feminist) efforts reach critical mass, then we will see feminism rolled back much faster.

One thing that’s poorly understood is why anti-feminism hasn’t reached critical mass yet.  That reason is old men.  Old men lived before feminism and even now don’t take the problem of feminism seriously.  Most old men that are against feminism even now treat it as something that is irrelevant to the daily lives of men instead of an entity that controls government policy.  Young men, on the other hand, are much more likely to realize the truth about feminism even if they haven’t fully defined the problem yet.  Young men have lived their entire lives under feminist control.  They went to feminist controlled day care, public schools, colleges (if they went to college), and workplaces.  Young men have always lived under a feminist controlled government and had to deal with feminist influenced women (and that’s includes women who don’t think they’re feminist).  They have seen their fathers, uncles, and older brothers get ass raped and lose their children in divorce court.  Every day an old man who is more likely to be feminist or who is not meaningfully opposed to feminism is replaced by a young man who has directly experienced the devastation feminism causes in his own life even if he hasn’t fully defined the problem as feminism just yet.  Anti-feminism will gain critical mass simply from old men dying and being replaced by young men even if nothing else is done.  It’s a slow process (relatively speaking), but it it happening.  Starting around 2020 or so, we will see anti-feminist progress gain speed.

Unfortunately, we have to be patient.

Jun 082013
 

I very rarely disagree with Paul Elam openly.  This is because he gets lots of “criticism” that’s baseless and all around silly nonsense that boils down to “Paul Elam is a godless commie or leftist”, “Paul Elam is a male version of a feminist”, “Paul Elam isn’t doing things my way or making the M(H)RM all about my pet issue”, “AVFM is insufficiently ‘Christian’ or ‘libertarian’”, “Paul Elam hates the white race”, or “Paul Elam and his terminology doesn’t follow my obscure philosophy”.  Adding my own disagreements, while minor, just creates an atmosphere of “see everyone hates Paul Elam”.  Also, Paul Elam (& AVFM) are in the trenches actually doing something a lot more than any of us.  They have a better idea of what would work to advance the M(H)RM from that alone than I ever could.

That being said, I agree with what rmaxgenactivepua said in his response to the most recent Entitlement Princess of the Month:

She also happens to be a former AVFM’er, proving AVFM needs to vet the women more stringently

Yes, AVFM needs to vet women (and men) joining it more stringently, because entryism is going to be an increasing problem.  (Entryism is when a group infiltrates another group, usually larger, in an attempt to expand their political or ideological base.)  We have already seen attempts at entryism in the M(H)RM from groups like the tradcons and the white (knight) nationalists.  In the game world, Susan Walsh was an entryist trying to create a “Game 2.0″.  (In fact, WBB is basically the Susan Walsh of the M(H)RM.)  As the M(H)RM expands in numbers and gets closer to the mainstream, the entryists will get more numerous and more sophisticated.  They will do a better job maintaining a pretense of supporting the M(H)RM than the tradcons or the white (knight) nationalists ever did.

How do we identify entryists in the M(H)RM?  We can’t assume that only women will be entryists.   Even though a woman is more likely to be an entryist than a man, both men and women can be entryists.  As time goes on there will be more entryists.  For now at least, the way to identify entryists like WBB is to find out their opinion on MGTOW.  Since MGTOW isn’t a movement of any kind, entryist tactics won’t work on it.  Thus, sooner or later an entryist will express their disgust and revulsion for MGTOW and will try to separate the M(H)RM from the MGTOW because MGTOW is a threat to what they’re trying to do.  If someone in the M(H)RM isn’t at least willing to leave MGTOW alone, then they’re definitely an entryist.

Jun 042013
 

The votes are in for the April 2012 Entitlement Princess of the Month.  The winner with 66% of the votes is Jamie Cuaca, the Indonesian woman who demanded $450,000 a month alimony.  Remember to keep submitting new entitlement princesses on the Entitlement Princess of the Month submission page.

This month is another month with no voting because there is an incredibly obvious winner.  The winner of the May 2013 Entitlement Princess of the Month is Kristina Hansen, otherwise known as Wooly Bumblebee at A Voice For Men.  She worked hard for the award by viciously slandering the idea of MGTOW (men going their own way).  She did it on Facebook:

wbb

 

And on youtube:

Both the Facebook comment and the video are dripping with entitlement.  She thinks she has the right to tell men how to live their lives and to control the direction of the M(H)RM.  You can see more of her entitlement princessness in this conversation she had with Paul Elam who understandably is getting very annoyed with her.  (The relevant part starts around 6:30):

While this video is filled with entitlement on her part, the most important aspect of her entitlement complex is how she refuses to listen.  She refuses to listen to Paul Elam.  She refuses to listen to the experiences of men.  She thinks she has the right to tell men to shut up.

Anything I write about these two videos will not do them justice.  You just have to watch them, and if you do it will become completely clear why Kristina Hansen was the only choice for the May 2013 Entitlement Princess of the Month.

Sep 042012
 

In my previous post asking if it was possible to defend a male space without making it explicitly hostile to women, Dragnet asked if there had been actual examples of a private organization that had been forced to accept women instead of private organizations just caving to cultural pressure.  The problem with that question is that “cultural pressure” could also include government pressure.  For example, in the past the government had threatened the MPAA with more regulation if it didn’t create its own film rating system.  The MPAA film rating system is “voluntary”, but it’s “voluntary” in the same way that people/businesses who have to pay off the mob for “protection” is voluntary.

Beyond that, there are examples of the government explicitly forcing purely private organizations to admit women.  It’s happened to a lot of charitable/service organizations.  The Boys and Girls Clubs used to be the Boys Clubs until the government ordered them to admit females.  The same thing happened to the Jaycees, the Kiwanis, and the Rotary Club.  When this issue came before the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court decided that these organizations were really “public accommodations” instead of the purely private organizations they actually were because their membership was “too inclusive” to be a private organization.  The Supreme Court also used reasoning that since these organizations could be used for business/career networking, anti-discrimination laws for employment also applied here to a degree.  What this means is that three guys having an ad hoc hunting club without women (for example) isn’t going to have to worry about the Supreme Court forcing them to admit women.  If it was a hunting clubs with thousands of members (or more), then the Supreme Court can and would order them to admit women.

The Supreme Court’s argument about business/career networking is particularly dangerous because business/career networking can happen anywhere where there is two or more people.  That reasoning gives the government carte blanche to order any organization regardless of size or its nature to admit women.  (For that matter, this reasoning gives the government an excuse to order any private organization to do what it wants.)

The Supreme Court also has not defined where the line between a truly private organization and a “public” one is.  At any time the government can come in and declare a private organization to be a “public accommodation”.  In theory it could define the three guys with an ad hoc hunting club to be a public accommodation.  That doesn’t happen because it isn’t worth the time of the government to do that.  The line between private organization and “public accommodation” is whenever the government wants to get involved with how a private organization runs things.

This tells us a lot about some of the problems that any mens rights organization will face in the future.  Consider a mens rights organization, which by definition is a private organization, that decides to exclude women.  That would make sense as we have seen women derail things as simple as blogs, and women disrupting the workings of (proto-)mens rights organizations.  As soon as that mens rights organization starts getting somewhere, the first thing the government will do will be to declare it a “public accommodation” because it is sufficiently large according to the government and business/career networking can happen there.  That will be the end of that mens rights organization.  Either the organization will disband to refuse to comply with the government’s orders, or it will admit women and grind to a halt.  Either way the mens rights organization in question is dead.

This isn’t an unsolvable problem, but it is a difficult one.  Completely decentralized solutions like MGTOW avoid this problem, but that isn’t going to get any laws changed either, at least not directly.  It’s the political equivalent of women invading a male space.  Once a male space gets big enough women are either going to want in or want to destroy it.

Aug 182012
 

I have been thinking a lot about the importance of male spaces.  There has been a feminist war on the existence of any and all male spaces based on the principle of if men are doing something, no matter what it is, without women, then they have to be stopped immediately.  This is also applies to predominantly male spaces like STEM employment, video games, “geek culture”, etc.  It’s no surprise that we have seen a feminist/female assault against these areas such as the constant blather about sexism in video games and Obama’s attempt to apply Title IX to STEM.  Whiskey has talked about how (female) Twilight fans (including the “Twi-moms”) took over Comic Con and ruined it.

We are running out of male spaces.  The feminization of game is being attempted.  There have been several attempts to turn the MRM into being all about women.  (The most recent attempt was the LadyMRAs reddit which was supposedly about women helping the MRM ended up exposing its real agenda when they became rabidly insane against MGTOW.)  The only real space that has managed to completely resist and fight off feminization and feminist invasion is MGTOW.  At least one reason for this is because women in general see the MGTOW as hostile to women (regardless of what men in the MGTOW space are actually doing).

Knowing that MGTOW has been the only male space to resist feminization and feminist invasion because it is (de facto) hostile to women, then is the only way to preserve male spaces by making them hostile to women?  8ball commenting at SWAB’s blog thinks that this could be the case:

I’m starting to wonder if it’s even possible to have a male-only space that isn’t hostile to women. And contrary to popular belief, this isn’t because I think any gathering of men will inherently turn misogynistic, rather the opposite.

Any space that isn’t completely alienating to women will eventually be …. “invaded” (for lack of a better term) by women, who will then insist that it conform to their sensibilities. Look at Geek culture for example.

You can see this happening in places like The Good Men Project. Most of their readers are women, a good percentage of their articles are not even remotely about men, and another significant percentage are about how men’s lives affect women. And even when the article is about men… often it is written by a woman.

I’m not sure how good of an example The Good Mangina Project is since it was started by male feminist men, but in thinking about it, 8ball has a point that even The Good Mangina Project now has a much higher percentage of women authors and women commenting and less articles even tangentially relevant to men than when they started.  In a way, this does show that male spaces have to be hostile to women to defend against feminization and feminist invasion.  While The Good Mangina Project didn’t start out as a true male space, it shows that any space that is feminized will become more feminized over time.

I’m certainly willing to listen to ideas on how to protect male spaces without making them completely hostile and alienating to women, but at this point, I can’t see any other solution to protecting male spaces.

Feb 292012
 

Deti compiled a list of memes that we hear from (conservative female supremacist) tradcons who claim to be against feminism, but are really AFINOs (anti-feminist in name only):

1. The manosphere is full of bitter and angry men.

2. Because of their bitterness and anger, these men are dangerous and violent, and therefore must be controlled (and punished if necessary).

3. These men are immoral and stand athwart conventional Judeo-Christian morality because they associate and identify ideologically with the Game/pickup artist sect of the manosphere.

4. Game is immoral, even in the marriage context, because it is grounded in fraud, deceit and manipulation of women.

5. Assuming it is true that Game allows men to exploit women’s psychological, sexual and sociobiological composition to ultimately manipulate them into sex (whether married or not), it proves that men are less moral than women, and that women occupy a higher moral plane than men. Women are pure. Men are base.

6. Men are much more to blame for the current SMP mess than women. Even though women were freed from prior legal, social and medical/risk of pregnancy constraints to have sex with whomever they wanted, men are more to blame because they took advantage of it. Men should have restrained themselves from the sexual smorgasbord the women put on offer.

7. Men who aren’t having sex should not be complaining about it. Christian single men are supposed to be chaste. Period, Full stop. Never mind that they see women — including the women in Church — doing literally whatever they want with whomever they want.

8. Christian single women are supposed to be chaste too, but if they are not, it is ultimately some man’s fault. Shaming sluts is diametrically opposed to Christian tenets of love, forgiveness and redemption, so we won’t do it. All she has to do is repent, come to Church and say she’s sorry for letting some man (men) ravage her body, and God will do the rest. We’ll leave aside for later the sticky wicket of natural consequences. Someone else will have to deal with that. We deal in the spiritual, and that’s all we need to do.

9. The divorce culture, the current legal setup in which women are encouraged to divorce for the flimsiest of reasons, men are impoverished and income streams to divorced women are arranged, the destruction of families: these things are bad. But men going around having premarital sex and deflowering precious paragons of virtue is worse, even if the paragons were begging for it. And any man who does this deserves to have a woman divorce and impoverish him, because that’s just and fair, and our God is a God of justice.

10. This so-called MGTOW business is merely men becoming parasites upon society. MGTOWs do nothing and ultimately give nothing back to the society in which they live and feed upon. They need to leave the MGTOW lifestyle, man up, quit playing video games and working at the comic book store, and marry the “reformed sluts” on which we are slapping those coats of Kilz. That way, these men can contribute to society in a way we believe is most appropriate. But if things go bad, or she decides she’s not haaaappy, or decides to EatPrayLove, he’s on his own. It’s his job to be nice to her, be sensitive to her needs, and submit himself to Jesus, the Ultimate Boyfriend and Lover of His/Her Soul. And if she leaves, it’s not our fault. We did our part. We had her pray the prayer. Hey, he f**ked up, he trusted us.

11. (Courtesy of FlirtyIntroverts) If men have it so bad and they feel they cannot get married because of unfair divorce laws, then they need to band together and change the divorce laws to make them fairer. The fact that the vast majority of men are not agitating for wholesale divorce reform means (1) they don’t think they are being treated unfairly; (2) the men who do get screwed got what’s coming to them; and/or (3) men still have all the political and economic power in this country and if they really wanted reform it would happen tomorrow.

Everytime a socon/tradcon shows up in the manosphere, they always end up saying these 11 things.  I don’t expect this to change.

Feb 122012
 

There’s a new show on the Discovery channel called Bering Sea Gold.  It’s one of those reality TV shows that show blue collar men working in remote regions of the world.  In this case, it’s about men from Nome, Alaska who are mining the seafloor of the Bering Sea for gold.

I’m not that interested in that type of show, but I usually like to catch an episode or two of these shows to confirm a theory I have about them.  That theory is that there will never be more than one woman who is a regular on this kind of TV show.  The reason for that is because when there’s real (and hard) work to be done, women are nowhere to be found.  It’s men who get real work done.  Sometimes, you will see one woman on this type of show, but no more because she’s the token chick.  This is probably because the producers didn’t want to feature men exclusively.

My theory held with Bering Sea Gold.  There’s only one woman who is mining gold, and she clearly is the token chick.  This chick is trying to earn money so she can pay to get a Masters degree in opera in Europe.  Apparently, she thought gold mining would be a good way to get cash.  Her main purpose seems to be showing cleavage to the camera (which she has done a few times) and screwing up.  To mine gold from the seafloor or the Bering Sea someone dives down from their boat and takes a massive vacuum to suck the top of the seafloor into a machine that sorts the gold from the dirt.  This works because the gold is in tiny pieces and on the top of the seafloor due to various natural processes.  The first time the token chick dived down, she wasn’t careful, and her arm got sucked into the vacuum.  She was able to get her arm out and was fine, but right before it happened anyone watching could tell she wasn’t being careful and was going to get her arm sucked into the vacuum.  Later she said that she is absent minded and not very safety conscious.  In other words, she an a direct encounter with reality that slapped her in the face.  The gold mining boat she is on is just her and the captain/owner of the boat.  The captain even said that her contribution to his gold mining operation was pretty minimal.

Beyond the token chick, there were some very interesting metaphors in this show.  The captain/owner of the boat that the token chick works on seems like a he could be a MGHOW.  At one point he talked about how he doesn’t have a girlfriend (the token chick isn’t his girlfriend and there is nothing going on between them at all), and how gold is really his girlfriend right now.  He also does things like live in a Mongolian yurt on the beach, etc.  Given the size of his boat and mining operation, he is also the one making the most money so far.  (There is a boat that is making more money than him, but it’s much bigger and has more overhead so this guy is coming out ahead so far.)  Of course the token chick is working for the possible MGHOW.  He has the gold (literally) while everyone else is tapped out.

On one of the other boats, the captain of that boat owes a lot in child support payments.  He has talked about how if he doesn’t get some money to pay child support, he’s going to jail.  In other words, he is practically mining gold to hand over to his ex-wife and her increasing demands.  That’s a real good metaphor for the feminist anti-family court system.

Even in Nome, Alaska, you can’t get away from feminism.

Jul 252011
 

One of the biggest strengths of mens rights is it’s ability to provide data and evidence:

Leave alone MRA, they have a capability to provide data and evidence way beyond this One-what blogger could ever do.

Marriage has benefits? Provide data. MRA can provide statistics and experience about courts, media, cops.

Not going on their way? If it seems a loser move, many MRA does not mean it as a refusal of sex altogether. Just the crap called marriage.

I am starting to believe MRA in abstract is too complicatd to understand for the average internet user (or blogger like that). MRA relates to men’s rights, not state, not religion, not any fucking else. No men’s rights? No civilization. Realize it.

While all of this is true, it goes beyond that.  While the MRM can provide data and evidence that it is correct, many men will experience the evidence directly (such as dealing with anti-family courts or a false sexual harassment allegation) or indirectly (knowing a man who has been the victim of feminism).  This is the reason that many men will come to conclusions that agree with MRAs and MGTOW before finding MRA and MGTOW blogs (if they ever find them).

Mar 292011
 

The Proboards holocaust has taken another MGTOW related forum.  This time the Happy Bachelors Forum got deleted.  Since Happy Bachelors has ample warning with the Don’t Marry and MGTOW forums getting deleted, they were able to back everything up and are already at a new location.  Things are still under construction there, but they’re back.

Feb 042011
 

And in this case by “interesting” I really mean batshit insane and totally nuts:

MGTOW, which stands for Men Going Their Own Way, has become a popular anti-feminist movement on the internet. Its basic premise, the rejection of today’s “liberated” women, sounds innocent enough. Many disgruntled males, myself included, initially found the MGTOW philosophy appealing because it resonated with our worldview, which was shaped by our unfortunate experiences with AW/WW over the years.

Once you dig deeper into the movement, however, you quickly discover just how degenerate and outright hypocritical it really is. The same people who (rightfully) criticize today’s women for being devoid of morals turn around and promote sleazy PUA techniques; brag about their one-night stands and other sexual conquests; engage in rectal sodomy; condone homosexuality and bisexuality; and glorify indecent behavior while shunning real manliness. While this may not describe everyone in the MGTOW movement, it does describe an overwhelming number of participants on MGTOW-themed message boards and blogs.

MGTOW communities are also havens for Marxists, Zionists, black supremacists, gang-stalkers, cybercriminals, and even pedophiles who take advantage of vulnerable young girls whilst abroad. No moral, God-fearing man would want to be associated with such shady, deplorable characters.

Also, if you are white, having pride in your race is a punishable offense in MGTOW Land. On one forum I used to frequent, a white South African man was banned for voicing his opinions about the Jewish Supremacists and their damaging influence on his race. Several forum members successfully convinced the moderators to crack down on this particular poster’s “antisemitism.” Meanwhile, black supremacists run rampant on that forum, because they have been given a free pass to spout their anti-white rhetoric and brag about having sexual affairs with white women. Talk about double standards!

Sickened by the unabashed dirtbags who frequent these forums, I recently posted a definition of ‘mgtow’ on Urban Dictionary. My intention was to warn potential members of the inherent dangers involved with aligning oneself with such slimeballs. This was my proposed definition of MGTOW:

“The losers of the internet. They engage in unprotected sex with third-world hookers and use sleazy PUA tactics to attract filthy AW. They brag about their sexual conquests and don’t take paternal responsibility when their sex partners become pregnant. The majority of MGTOW are atheists. They idolize the slimeball cast of Jersey Shore and wish to emulate them. They defend homosexuality, bisexuality, rectal sodomy, and public obnoxiousness. They think it’s “cool” to act disrespectfully and engage in gang-stalking activity. They are in league with the criminal, anti-white KOBE organization. They are perfect matches for the feminists. The feminists hate men and MGTOW have no respect for women. They “pump and dump” women and then brag about it to their dirtbag friends. Roissy in DC is their hero. They have a lot of neo-Marxists within their ranks who worship Che Guevara. They try to marginalize Ron Paul a la the lamestream media. They are satanic to the core and will not gain admission into the kingdom of heaven. Their lives are full of sin, treachery, and lies. They fake friendships like their hero Stargazer does. They are untrustworthy and unscrupulous. Furthermore, most five year-olds possess a higher level of mental and emotional maturity. No wise man or woman would ever confuse your typical MGTOW dweeb with true anti-feminists who live moral lives, believe in God, conduct themselves in a respectable manner, and do not wear tattoos.

The MGTOW movement is for you if you enjoy sodomy, condone homosexuality, don’t believe in God, wear tattoos, listen to rap and death metal music, act obnoxiously in public, defend bullies, engage in one-night stands, enjoy filthy network programming like Jersey Shore, and support Hollywood. The most despicable characters will fit right in with the SADs, PAMs, and other lowlifes who frequent MGTOW forums.”

There seemingly must be MGTOW editors on Urban Dictionary, because my perfectly valid definition was rejected. Here is the response that I received from UD’s editors:

“Thanks for your definition of mgtow!

Editors reviewed your entry and have decided to not publish it.

To get a better idea of what editors publish and reject, sign up as an Urban Dictionary Editor here: http://editor.urbandictionary.com/

Urban Dictionary”

Meanwhile, a plethora obscene words and definitions remain on the website today.

Chances are, Urban Dictionary’s gross negligence will result in unsuspecting people becoming victims of the decadent, gang-stalking villains that are overrepresented in MGTOW communities. Those boards and blogs are filled with criminal sociopaths who wouldn’t think twice about ruining your personal life, career, and reputation. This is not paranoia; this is real. As posted a few weeks ago on The Ghost Nation forum, ”Criminal sociopaths always call their victims paranoid.”

The Ghost Nation, one of the of the few strict anti-feminist websites on the internet, has been subject to numerous cyberattacks over the years. According to the site’s webmaster, MGTOW members were directly responsible for these attacks. The IP addresses of the offenders were logged — and traced back to MGTOW losers like Stargazer. In addition to their cyberattacks, they have made violent threats towards AWS, blogger Robin Steele, patriotic family man Stephen DeVoy, and other decent individuals. Become involved with MGTOW at your own peril. Just don’t say I didn’t warn you if something happens to you because you decided to affiliate yourself with “the losers of the internet.”

I would think this is Thordaddy/Josh F. but there’s no talk of de-facto homo-ism.  There’s so much I could say about this, but it really speaks for itself.  It made me laugh for half an hour.

Dec 292009
 

Christmas is filled with traditions.  We’re all familiar with the regular traditions, but there are lesser known ones such as the viewing of National Lampoon’s Christmas Vacation with Chevy Chase.  I love the squirrel scene:

There are other Christmas traditions as well.  I don’t experience this every year, but there is the tradition of one or more people my parents’ age (not my parents, that’s a different story) asking if I have a girlfriend.  I love how telling them I don’t have a girlfriend.  It makes them squirm because they can’t deal with the idea of a MGHOW instead of following the standard life script ™.  (Plus, I’m not going to tell them about how I had two girlfriends at the same time.)  Women my parents age are especially mortified at the idea that I’m single because it means no woman is able to sink her claws into my money (and they have no idea what the real extent of my assets are).  Why shouldn’t they be pissed at the fact that I’m living in paradise?

Since I travel to my original undisclosed location for Christmas, there is also the tradition of seeing (or hearing about) friends and acquaintances I wouldn’t see/hear about otherwise.  Sometimes that leads to finding out about a story like which I’m going to tell you about.

I heard about someone I really don’t know that well.  This guy is around 10 years younger than me give or take so we were never friends or anything like that.  He’s in college now, and I heard about his girlfriend that his parents don’t like.  And with good reason because she’s a bitch.  I also figured out that’s this girl is a big time feminist.  She is majoring in womens’ studies.  I’m not kidding.  She plans on going into some type of social work.  In other words, she will be in some sort of feminist bureaucracy and be a feminist problem generator.  Of course, she doesn’t know how to cook either.  This guy is (or at least was) really into her.  He did everything for her from cooking to cleaning to whatever.  She never reciprocated obviously.  Her behavior was so odious that his (somewhat leftist) parents noticed.  Of course, they didn’t make the connection between her behavior and feminism.

This guy was actually thinking he was going to have a future with this girl.  Fortunately, it sounds like his dad convinced him out of it.  However, that was only due to his dad making him realize just how much things would suck with this girl since she wouldn’t be able to contribute to a marriage/household financially (which is a big deal since a job in his current major doesn’t pay a large salary) and wouldn’t be willing to contribute non-financially.  (Remember that knowing basic life skills like cooking are oppressive to women.)  That probably solved the problem of the current girlfriend, but it doesn’t solve anything longer term since he probably will end up with another woman that’s just as bad.  Of course, his parents aren’t telling him the truth about women which isn’t surprising since I’m certain that they don’t know the truth about women either.  (I really don’t know the guy well enough to get involved in any way.)

It’s just another example of a guy overvaluing a vagina.

Dec 272009
 

I have been busy for a few days so I haven’t had a chance to respond to this comment from Susan Walsh.

I called you a dick because you called me a shitty mother.

I don’t know if you are a shitty mother in general.  I will assume you are not without evidence to the contrary.  However, you are a shitty mother when it comes to teaching your son about male-female interaction.  Nearly all mothers are shitty when it comes to telling their sons about the reality of women (and that includes my mother too) so you are hardly unique.

This is really just one aspect of the problem of female solipsism.

I also noticed you avoided talking about your comment about how I’m only capable of relating to women as “cum dumpsters”.  If I only relate to women as “cum dumpsters” as you say, Susan, then I was only able to do anything with women by relating to them only as “cum dumpsters”.

ED is a real problem among young men and it is growing.

Then quit whining when men take this problem seriously and go see a doctor about it.

As I stated on my blog, when one watches a lot of porn, those arousal patterns become entrenched in the brain. When men or women then find themselves in regular, normal, non-porn scenarios, they find that arousal eludes them.

I’m not sure what “a lot” of porn is, but if this is the case why didn’t I have this problem when I lost my virginity recently?  I don’t know if I watched “a lot” of porn or not.  Regardless, I wasn’t doing any “porn scenarios” with either woman I was with.

Besides what is the definition of “porn” here?  A quick search of the internet can find all different types of porn, many of which have some type of normal looking (i.e. not David Alexander bait) women.

Men aged 18-25 represent the fastest-growing group being prescribed Viagra

Is this because they actually need viagra or because because we’re pill happy in the US?  Given that this is the same age group with the biggest problem of heavy drinking and binge drinking it stands to reason that is a bigger part of the problem rather that “real ED”.  It’s not even like they have to stop drinking, but it’s easier to push a pill.

The reason I stated that men should stop wasting doctor’s time is that they are frequently loathe to admit how much porn they watch

It rarely matters so its irrelevant.  Besides what are these guys supposed to do if they aren’t getting laid?  They’re horny, and they need to do something about it.  Porn ends up being the answer unless they discover game.

Hurling the “shaming language” accusation won’t cut it

There’s a reason the catalog of anti-male shaming tactics exists. It’s because we hear the same things over and over again from women on these issues.  Susan, you almost could have copied and pasted some of the things you said from that list.

I’m also not sure why you keep denigrating my education – I never sought to use my degree in any other way than to explain on my own blog that I refer to my business background in the way I solve relationship problems. It’s you in the Game community who keep calling attention to my Wharton MBA. In insisting that I earned it only through affirmative action, what do you hope to accomplish? Why would you even say that? How do you know?

First, you brought up your degree and made a claim that it’s relevant.  Thus it brings up the question if you actually earned your degree.  Since affirmative action means lower standards for women and non-Asian minorities (as well as kicking out a deserving applicant using the guns of the state), this is a real question.  At the time you attended Wharton there were hardly any women going after MBAs but an affirmative action program which means they were desperate for women.  Thus any woman could have gotten in and gotten an MBA from them.  I have no idea what your transcript was at Wharton, but anyone who could have benefited from affirmative action is suspect of having not met the actual standard of earning whatever they claimed to earn.  Because of affirmative action, there is a good chance you never actually met the standard to earn a Wharton MBA particularly given the gender ratio of the Wharton MBA program at the time you attended.  Thus your MBA is suspect at best and any talk about your “business background” is also suspect at best since you may have benefited from affirmative action there as well.

I do want men to be healthy. I want them to be fit for relationships, because that is what my own readers are looking for.

And here it comes.  An anon covered this as well.  If you look up female supremacism in the dictionary, this excerpt will be there as an example.  Here we have a primary example of how women believe that men are supposed to be slaves for women.  Susan is saying that men are only supposed to be healthy because women want it.

I’m much harder on the women than the men

Given that so heavily skewed pro-female now, you would have to be about ten thousand times harder on women than you are now for that to be meaningful.

What is the real female problem with porn?  MarkyMark has already pointed that out: It exposes the slut lifestyle.  Many women are afraid about the truth about women getting out whether its due to porn or game or something else.  After understanding the truth about women, men will start going their own way (whether its using game to get laid occasionally, ghosting, etc. does not matter) and not be under the thumb of a woman.

All this talk about the problems supposedly caused by porn remind me of all the people who talk about the problems supposedly caused by video games.  When it comes to video games, it was all shown to be bunk, and it will be the same with porn.  What both of these have in common is that men (and boys in the case of video games) enjoy them.  This is nothing more than another attack on a predominantly male activity.  It’s also safe to say that there is some fear of male sexuality on the part of women here.

Another thing going on is that women are afraid of the competition from porn.  Of course, in the future with virtual reality sex and later sex bots, this “problem” will only get worse for women.  That’s what happens in an economic bubble when women keep raising the price of sex and offering less and less.

Nov 132009
 

There is this Middle Eastern place for lunch half a block away from my office that I occasionally go to.  I have been there enough times that the owner recognizes me as a semi-regular customer.  I went there for lunch today and the owner was behind the counter.  There was the usual hi, how are you.  For his side of the how are you he said something interesting, “You know.  Just another day in paradise.”

This got me thinking.  I get made fun of and/or attacked by plenty of people online for being a virgin and for GMOW.  If I told anyone IRL about this aspect of my life the same thing would happen IRL.  The fact is that my life is better than theirs to the point that compared to their lives, I’m living in paradise.  This is true of my life compared to most people’s lives in general.

The biggest reason is that because I’m a MGHOW I’m free.  I look at all of my married (male) coworkers, friends, acquaintances, business associates, etc. and unless they just got married three months ago, they are slowly becoming more and more miserable.  This is not surprising since they are trapped.  Several of my coworkers got together to take this automotive repair class.  That’s sensible enough because if you’re willing to spend the time it can save you a lot of money.  But the real unspoken reason is that these guys have been semi-exiled from their own homes in a way.  They are looking for a way to spend time in their garages away from the rest of their house and family.  They are the ones working to pay the mortgages on these houses, and they have been exiled from most of their property!

Then you have the divorced guys.  If you’re reading this blog, then you don’t need me to go into detail about the devastation that happens to men during divorce.  I do have some interesting stories like with this one guy I know who got married at the top of the housing bubble.  Since he got married, he “had” (as in his wife made him using shaming language who was probably helped by a realtor named Suzanne) to buy a house.  Given the insanity of house prices at the time, he ended up buying a house that is about a far away from DC as you can get while still being considered in the “greater DC area”.  They got divorced a while back and he got stuck with the house.  He has been trying to sell it with no luck.  For now he is stuck with a hugely long commute each way to work with lots of traffic.  That is pretty telling.

The unmarried guys are the best off, but too many of them think they “need” a woman.  All this means is that these guys are easily manipulated by women.  (Even game won’t protect you from this idea as we can give examples of guys who know game, but still place way too much importance on women.)  I do my best to convince these guys otherwise, but a lot of them are willing to go into the slaughterhouse.

I’m free, and these guys aren’t.  I’m able to go where I want, do what I want, and not make stupid financial decisions due to female shaming language.  This permeates to all aspects of my life whether its being more financially secure than them or being happier since I don’t have a harpy sucking the life out of me.  Compared to most people, I am living in paradise.

If you think I’m being asinine about this, the read this post about the marriage timetable from The Better Beta and reconsider your view.

Sep 142009
 

I found this story about some guy whose girlfriend wants to try scat vis the MGTOW forums.  (For those of you who don’t know what scat is, it’s explained in the quote below.)  Here’s what the guy said:

Recently, my girlfriend of two months came up to me with a request for something foul. She wants me to try scat with her. Before I continue, let me say something. If you don’t know what scat is then trust me when I say that you don’t want to find out. Take my advice and don’t read this thread. When my girlfriend explained to me what scat is, I threw up right away, and I’ve been shaking ever since. So, believe me when I say that you don’t want to know what it is. If you aren’t planning on taking that advice, then know that you’re following at your own risk.

My girlfriend wants to poop in my mouth and have me eat it and swallow it. That’s what scat is. It’s the most horrific thing I’ve heard of, and my girlfriend wants to try it on me this saturday. She wants me to fulfill her desire. And I agreed to do it. She told me that if I’m not willing to do this for her, then I’m not a real boyfriend, that I don’t love her, and that we should break up. And, well… I love her. And when you love someone, you do these kinds of things for them. My girlfriend has been stuffing her face full of everything from bean burritos to chili, with plenty of laxatives thrown in for good measure. She wants to pull out the biggest crap of her life, just for me. I don’t think there’s any backing out at this point. Come this Saturday, my girlfriend wants to execute the greatest display of control and female empowerment on me that she possibly can by using me as a toilet. And there’s nothing that I can do about it now because I love her and I don’t want to disappoint. I’m just so terrified that I need help and some people to talk to.

This may not be a real situation, but it’s good for the points I wish to make.  First of all this guys is a spineless wimp like plenty of other guys.  Also, take note of the standard shaming language used, how he is not a “real boyfriend” if he doesn’t do this.  Notice how he feels that he has no options.  He has two very good options.  The first is simply refusing.  The second is:
DUMPING HER SORRY ASS

This guy doesn’t need her, but he’s hasn’t freed himself of decades of pro-female programming to be able to do this.  If he discovered MGTOW, he would be able to do what he should do.
This is an extreme example, but most guys have this problem.  Most guys are easily manipulated and controlled by their girlfriends/wives (or women in general) because of sex (or the promise of sex) and general pro-female programming that makes them think they “need a relationship”.  Various MGTOW are either single, in relationships, married, ghosting, etc.  What all MGTOW have in common is that they won’t become a “toilet” for some woman.  Being a man who knows that he doesn’t need a relationship is critical to GYOW.
There’s also a lot of other things that can be said about this scat story, but just reading the full post says it better than I ever could.  There’s also some interesting metaphors you could make for the current state of male-female relationships.
Also related to this is a post by Dr. Helen about how men lie to women.  Dr. Helen calls these lies that men say to women self preservation, not lying, and there is a lot of truth to it.  For a married man who can have his life destroyed or worse by divorce, it is self preservation.  Again we have the same problem.  Men have been programmed to think that they must have a relationship so they engage in this “self preservation” to protect themselves.  While married men are stuck, if you aren’t a married man a better option is to GYOW and
DUMP HER SORRY ASS

Men need to learn that they don’t need women, end of story.
Aug 222009
 

On various blogs there has been an explosion of discussion about “game”.  Some have said game is anti-Christian.  Other’s have said that it can be used to get and maintain a marriage.  And that is just one of the many topics of game that are being discussed.

Those of you who have read my comments know that while I have nothing against game (and think that it can be used by Christian men as long as they use it in a moral manner), I don’t see a whole lot of value in using game.  My issues with game aren’t moral, but practical.  Game will not protect you against STDs.  (No one claims that it does, but do you really want to be having sex with some STD infested skank.  Looking for women in church does not protect you against this either regardless of whether you are using game or not.)  Game will not protect you against divorce, false rape charges, sexual harassment charges, etc.  The proponents of game will claim that these aren’t problems, and that game itself will mean that a woman won’t do any of this to you, but let’s face it.  It’s bunk.  Vigorous assertion will not protect you.


Game also has the problem of carrying the assumption that getting laid (or getting married for those with that moral position) is the most important thing in the world.  The practitioner of game is desperate for female approval just like the apocryphal ”nice guy”.  A practitioner of game can still be ruled by a woman easily and be manipulated by women through the use of shaming language.  This is related to the fact that use many proponents of game use shaming language against men who do not use game.  Shaming language is used to paper over the fact that game has its own problems.  This is why MGTOW is superior to game.  By going his own way, a man is in control of his own life.


Beyond all that, I have noticed that game carries an implicit wrong assumption, namely that biology is immutable and some sort of magic.  The fact is women are NOT fertility goddesses.  On various blogs proponents of game have claimed that since this is the way women are, men just have to deal with it, and men’s only option is game based on concepts of evolutionary psychology.  (It’s important to remember here that a reasonable man adapts himself to the world, but the unreasonable man tries to adapt the world to himself so all progress depends on the unreasonable man.)  Clearly, female behavior must have a basis in some combination of biology and psychology or otherwise having no fault divorce laws, sexual harassment laws, etc. wouldn’t matter since women wouldn’t used them.  The fact of the matter is all of this is changeable. We need not be victims to evolutionary psychology.  Evolutionary psychology and biology are not magic.  If biology is causing a problem as it is with the way female behavior currently is, then let’s fix the biology.  In the long term we can use technologies such as genetic engineering and gene therapy to do this.  Granted, both of these technologies are in their infancy, and it will be a long time before we can do this.  In the future genetic engineering will be used for everything else, so its perfectly reasonable as a solution to this problem too.

Aug 082009
 

The internet was designed to be a network that would work after a nuclear war. To achieve such a network, it was designed to be completely decentralized and route around any damage. More on this in a second.

One of the problems of trying to promote the cause of men’s rights is women who would just shout that all MRAs are just misogynists. They don’t bother with justification, evidence, or logic, but it works due to female herd mentality. Even many women who claim to be on our side will just go on to MRA and MGTOW blogs and claim that we’re all misogynists under the guise of “helping us” and/or “making our “arguments more convincing”.

How do we get around this? By going our own way, the MGTOW concept. MGTOW works the same way the internet does. It’s completely decentralized. Most men who are GTOW will never hear of the MGTOW concept. They will just do it. It also routes around the damage women cause with their misogyny shtick. It other words MGTOW works for the same reasons the internet works.

Jul 292009
 

Two tactics that get used against the MRM and MGTOW are triangulation (which Bill Clinton is famous for) and moral equivalence. Triangulation is when someone presents their views above left or right sides of the political spectrum (since its used usually in politics). This is also can and has been used by someone who is trying to discredit the MRM and MGTOW. A person doing that will claim that the MRM and MGTOW hate women just like the feminists hate men and thus claim themselves to be “above” it all. Someone who engages in this tactic is also engaging in moral equivalence because they are also claiming that both sides are equally guilty of bad behavior. Both of these claims are total lies.

What feminists have done over the last 40 years is declare total war against men. Feminists have taken control of various arms of government such as the judiciary, public schools, etc. to oppress men. Given the socialist nature of feminism this is natural for them. For the last 40 years feminists have allowed women to make false rape accusations, to divorce on a whim and take everything a man has, to take his children away, to make false sexual harassment accusations, etc. This list of ways that feminists have allowed women to use government power to oppress men goes on and on.
There is no equivalent among the MRM and MGTOW. In fact the very nature of MGTOW precludes this since its men GOING THEIR OWN WAY. There are people who will claim that men will do the same things women are doing now once feminism is overthrown. That is false because of the libertarian nature of the MRM and MGTOW. (Not all members of the MRM and MGTOW are libertarians but there is a general consensus that government is too powerful and large. There are very few socialists in the MRM and probably none GTOW. Nearly all would agree with the view that if nothing else libertarianism is a vector, as in we need to move in the direction of less government.) Knowing this how are men going to do the same things women are doing to men now? It’s impossible because there won’t be big powerful government.
Therefore the purpose of using triangulation and moral equivalence is just to bring down the MRM and MGTOW to the level of the feminists. The difference between feminism and the MRM/MGTOW is so stark that lies like this have to be used because the MRM and MGTOW are clearly morally and ethically superior since the MRM and MGTOW don’t believe in big powerful government.
Jul 242009
 

MarkyMark on his blog has a story from fuckedcompany.com about the hell one man is going through being married to a woman. You can follow the link to read all the details. The upshot is this man got married, and his life is a living hell now thanks to the behavior of his wife.

In reading the comments to this post on MM’s blog it’s amazing the lengths people will go even anti-feminist men will go to absolve women of their behavior. It’s a triangle as I mentioned in the title because there are 3 angles in which men are being blamed for the behavior of women:
  1. The female angle of the guy must have “done something” to piss his wife off. This is the point of view in the first comment on MM’s blog to this story by “Kimberly”. (She’s tries to backpedal on this later, but it’s still somehow the “man’s fault”.) It’s clear that the woman is responsible for her own behavior, but someone this guy had “done something” to piss his wife off despite the fact that if a man acted the same way he would be considered psychotic.
  2. The pseudo-alpha (I say pseudo-alpha since as I have pointed out most supposed alphas aren’t really alphas) angle said by “Keoni Galt” of that the guy needs to “man up”. (Yes, this is borderline shaming language.) In this case, it’s because the guy isn’t dominating his wife enough. Again, the wife is acting psychotic. Why should a man have to act a certain way just so his wife acts like a NORMAL HUMAN BEING? (Before anybody points out how this worked for Keoni Galt remember there was a 50/50 chance he would be sitting in jail now because his wife felt “threatened”. Think about that.) Beyond that I know that I like many other men like to relax occasionally, and you can never relax with this option because then it will fail.
  3. The male feminist angle which really isn’t represented in the comments is sort of hit on by the guy having the problem (offering to do the dishes and the like). The male feminist will claim that its the man’s fault because he didn’t understand what his wife was going through or some other nonsense. The male feminist will also claim things like how the man needs to wash the dishes to show that he isn’t part of the patriarchy oppressing her or some other crap. As we can see from the story that doesn’t work. (This also could be called the beta or herb angle.)
What all of these things have in common is that the man is blamed for his wife’s behavior which in original story is clearly psychotic. These three angles create a triangle that surround and trap the man. The man can try to solve this problem by assuming that one of the three angles is correct in defining the problem and trying to solve that problem. However, whatever angle the man picks it will not work. Even if he tries another side of the triangle it still won’t work.
On top of all this by picking one side of this triangle, the man is not picking the other two. Why is this important? Because they all can say that the man is still wrong even if he picks one of the supposed problems to solve. In other words, the man is running around and around while his wife is acting all psychotic. It allows all three sides of the triangle to blame him for his wife’s behavior almost forever since by definition according to two thirds of the triangle the man is always wrong.
What is the key to breaking out of this triangle? It’s going your own way, namely MGTOW. What happened was this man let himself get into a position where what was happening in his life was defined by insane people (i.e. his wife) and people who are trying to prop up women to their own benefit (women, pseudo-alphas, and male feminists/herbs). The entire point of this triangle is to trap a man. If all a man sees are the sides of a triangle, he can’t escape from it. The MGTOW concept gives men a way out of this trap.
A MGHOW will still get blamed by women, pseudo-alphas, and male feminists because its in their interest to do so. However, a MGHOW will not be trapped in the hell that the guy from the original story is in. A MGHOW is able to live his life the way he wants.
Jun 212009
 

Today is Father’s Day in the United States. That means we can expect the usual shaming language from politicians like Obama and Biden and in sermons across all churches where men will be told that they aren’t grown up until they become fathers such as how Boundless Brainless claims. Of course, you will hear nothing about how women use divorce courts to throw out fathers or how women make false claims of child abuse to throw out fathers. Instead lots of shaming language will be used against responsible men who make logical decisions to avoid divorce courts, false allegations of abuse, and perhaps women in general. Many fathers on Father’s Day are unable to see or talk to their kids.

I am certain many of these responsible men would like to become fathers, but don’t because its too dangerous. This is why I have talked about artificial wombs. With no mother involved the father can’t lose his kids. However, artificial wombs don’t exist yet, or do they?
I recently discovered that they do in a way. This comment on Novaseeker’s blog talked about the Rotunda Clinic in India. What the Rotunda Clinic in India will do if you pay them a little less than $10,000 is take a man’s sperm, put it together with an egg donor and surrogate mother in India to make a man a baby that is his. There’s a video on their website about a gay couple who did just that. It’s safe to say that the egg donor and surrogate mother being in India won’t be able to access the American legal system so for a man, the baby is completely and totally his. Since the Rotunda Clinic will do this as long as you pay them, a man on his own could do this. If you want you can use an artificial womb today.
Imagine Father’s Days when you never have to worry about losing your kids. This is why artificial wombs will be used by men who want kids in this way. Already men are raising their kids more. This is a natural progression.
May 262009
 

The two most important technologies for male liberation that haven’t been invented yet are sex bots and artifical wombs.  

Sex bots are robots that are designed to look like women (or men) for the purposes of sex.  The benefit for men is obvious.  How much time do men spend thinking about sex, trying to get sex (and failing most of the time if they aren’t an “alpha”), etc.?  If you’re not an “alpha”, then you are a man who has gone through a lot of humiliation to get sex and/or relationships.  A sex bot is an easy way to relive this need.
Artifical wombs are only relevant if you have a desire for kids.  Many men do.  Combined with genetic engineering, cloning, and other technologies, artifical wombs allow men to have children without women.
The real power of sex bots and artifical wombs is when they both exist.  If only sex bots exist then a man who wants kids will still have to get involved with a woman.  If only artifical wombs exist men who want sex will still have to go to women.  The real benefit to men will happen when both of these technologies exist.
I know someone will bring up the issue of cost.  All technologies get cheaper over time.  Also, think about how much a divorce, false abuse charges, and child support for a child that isn’t yours cost. 
Or think about it in these terms, if the Duke Lacrosse 3 had sex bots they wouldn’t have ordered a stripper and never been put through the hell they experienced.