internet » Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Technology

I know FB has asked us to stop paying attention to manboobz but I have a point. Manboobz decided to comment on my last post completely missing the point. (And he managed to do it very quickly. I would assume that he had some sore of government-feminist job except that he’s still a guy and a ninth class citizen under feminism regardless of his views.) Manboobz said at the end about my prediction of an anti-feminist Stuxnet:

Well, that’s one way to win the war of ideas.

To manboobz feminism vs. mens rights is some sort of debating and mental masturbation society. Manboobz has does not truly grasp the destruction feminism has caused in men’s lives. To someone like manboobz its all an academic argument or at most is about getting laid. (This is a problem shared by others such as Susan Walsh.)

Men are sitting in jail for crimes they did not commit because of feminism. Men have had their children taken away from them because of feminism. Men are paying child support to children that aren’t theirs (paternity fraud) because of feminism. Men have had their lives destroyed by divorces forced on them because of feminism. Men have had their jobs destroyed because of feminism and a hostile feminist government. Men are losing their freedom because of feminism. Men have been murdered because of feminism.

All of these things show us how this is not a “war of ideas”. This is why I talked about how there will probably be an anti-feminist Stuxnet in the future. Manboobz focused on how I said the worm would take down feminist blogs and websites. That would be at best a secondary goal (and more difficult than its primary goal). The primary goal would be taking down the computers and networks of feminist groups influencing the government to destroy men (i.e. NOW) and various organizations and government agencies that exist to destroy men. Men my age and younger have seen how their fathers, brothers, uncles, grandfathers, male friends, male business associates, etc. have been destroyed my feminism if it has not already happened to us. We have been forced to sit through (attempted) feminist indoctrination at public (and even private) schools. To many men this ceased to be a “war of ideas” a long time ago and is one step away from being an actual shooting war. This isn’t a war men are planning to start. It’s a war that was already declared on men, and the only question is when groups of men will still fighting back in such a direct manner. In such a situation where it’s a war or almost one, new and interesting weapons to fight feminism will be created.

The Stuxnet worm has provided an example of how malware can attack specific targets. Instead of nuclear reactors the same principles can be used to create a worm that attacks feminist organizations and feminist created government agencies that destroy men. The men who write this malware will not be concerned with silencing feminists as if they were anti-free speech. They will be concerned with taking down the array of groups who are currently successfully destroying men.

There are many computer viruses and worms out there. Stuxnet is an evolution of the computer worm in a sense. It’s the first worm to spy on and reprogram industrial systems. Stuxnet does this by attacking Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems used to control and monitor industrial processes and reprogramming Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs). It’s possibly the first worm to have a specific target which is believed to be the Bushehr nuclear reactor in Iran. It’s believed that only a country could have produced it. This is likely if for no other reason that it would be next to impossible to find a malware programmer with knowledge of SCADA systems.

A future Stuxnet will not need to be created by a country since the conceptual knowledge (at least) is out there now. Plus, the target of a future Stuxnet may not need specialized knowledge of systems like SCADA. Imagine what an anti-feminist Stuxnet would do. It would specifically target computers belonging to NOW (the National Organization of Women) and other women’s groups, child support agencies, family/divorce courts, women’s studies departments at universities, etc. Perhaps it could target something as specific as feminist websites and blogs (although for maximum effectiveness that would require advancements in natural language processing and machine learning that will not happen in the near term).

Critical systems like the Bushehr nuclear reactor are much better protected than the computer systems and networks feminists use. Truly critical systems are not even put on the internet. That is not the case with most of the computers that an anti-feminist Stuxnet will target. An anti-feminist Stuxnet would be much easier to create. Unless it seriously wants to attack databases, an anti-feminist Stuxnet does not require even a minimum of specialized knowledge besides being able to identify its target systems. Creating an anti-feminist Stuxnet will be within the skills of at least a significant fraction of malware programmers (if not most or all). This means that in the near future there probably will be an anti-feminist Stuxnet.