Like the universe the number of haters I have is always expanding. MikeeUSA has now added himself to my haters. He sent me two emails through the Spearhead email interface.
What is good for men? The following certainly aren’t bad for men, pro-women’s rights quisling scum are opposed to such things which are in the interests of men ofcourse, and such men make up the bulk of the “Men’s Rights Movement”. They think they can beg themselves into power or influence, they just want a scrap, a bone, that’s all… and isn’t that so… reasonable? They, like all pathetic appeasers, get kicked for their “efforts”, they come back ofcourse, and suggest that some more BAD men get thrown under the bus so that their own very small and inconsequential marginal interests might be listened to (which they aren’t). The following are suggestions that such men oppose… suggestions which are actually in the interests of all men
* Females be married once they are able to have children (usually at ages: 12, 13, 14).
* Men never persecuted for having relations with a young female of childbearing age.
* The marital rape exception reinstated (So that a man is never persecuted for raping his wife).
* If a man rapes a unmarried/unbetrothed++ virgin girl he marries her, pays her father some money, and doesn’t divorce her.
++Bethrothal here meaning female living with husband for about one year before the marraige feast/ceremony.
* Females barred from bringing claims against their husband (or similar) in court.
* Females barred from divorcing their husbands.
* Females barred from collecting monies from husband (child support etc).
* Other similar things to remove all power from females and make them what men desire.
(About Child Support: A saying from Bob is: child support is a seat at a Man’s table and a cot to sleep on in his house)
* Women’s rights activists be cleansed from the earth.
* All rapists, batterers, etc be freed from the prisons.
* Clone girls, sell them (untouched) to men, so as to constructivly change the market so that all men have what they wish to have.
* Investigate who brought women’s rights upon the world, destroy those who did (in much of the world women’s rights is new as of the 90s and 00s: in India, for example, it really started in earnest in the late 90s).
Young wives are a supreme pleasure to men. That is why they are now banned the world over
In most of the world it is now illegal to take a young wife under the age of 18 or to have relations with one’s wife at will.
And there is _nothing_ men can do about it.
Men have NO political power.
(You can’t jerrymander THIS 48 percent minority into a majority anywhere (because, unlike with races, men and women are dispersed together everywhere in the same ratio.)
“”Snark February 27, 2010 at 19:3
MikeeUSA is a woman. Those comments have to be written by a feminist posing as an embittered male. –antifeministtech
This was what occurred to me at first.
When feminists realise that MRAs are not trying to defend some u2018right to rapeu2019 or u2018right to beat womenu2019, but that we may actually have some issues worth consideration u2013 e.g. forced circumcision u2013″”
28 If a man happens to meet a virgin who is not pledged to be married and rapes her and they are discovered, 29 he shall pay the girl’s father fifty shekels of silver. [c] He must marry the girl, for he has violated her. He can never divorce her as long as he lives.
If the Men who wrote the Bible are women, then yeah I’m a woman too.
You think that if you’re a “nice reasonable man” women will vote the way you want. You don’t understand human nature and you haven’t been paying attention to the last 150 years.
You’re a quisling piece of shit.
It’s been clear for a long while that the men in the MRM are NOT for the interests of men.
You just want a little less harsh version of women’s rights / feminism.
You are for “equality” “justice” etc, not for what’s best for your fellow man.
You are _scum_.
Antifeministtech (and pro-women’s rights friends): If you were about to be railroaded by your wife, and I knew how you could transfer your assets safely out of harms way, I would NOT tell you.
I would watch it happen. Later I’d say “sorry, didn’t want to help a scumbag that likes to see men who rape their wives go to prison”
“I’m glad you got fucked over”
“now you know how the men in prison feel”
“fuck you scumbag”
You’re a worthless quisling.
If I told any of the men at my school about this “movement” they’d laugh.
It’s a group of pathetic* fucks who don’t want to screw young females, nor wish to rape their wives at will, nor have any privledge and honor.
No they want to wallow in the muck begging for reasonable consessions.
Are you even men? You aren’t even attracted to young females of childbearing age.
*(who choose to be this way because they won’t even demand their liberties as men, nah, only impostor “women” do that… and the “women” biblical scribes from 5000 years ago)
Justus: I’m not a bot, I’m not advertising. You simply don’t like what I say, like most women’s rights supporting men. You and your kind is why women’s rights reign supreme around the world. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:MaritalRapeCriminalizedMap.svg
[quote]Snark February 28, 2010 at 06:45
Iu2019m sure I canu2019t be the only one disturbed by certain characters trying to bring Rape Rights and Pedophile Rights under the banner of the MRM.
To those certain characters: fuck off!
You are worse than most feminists.
You are disturbed because you are not an ally of men.
You support women’s rights and are a member of the male column that allows women’s rights to continue to exist. You are made of the same stuff as the valliant white knight that destroyes his fellow man for what is good and just and in the power interests of women.
You are an ally of the feminists and you should they ever fall, you and yours will surely be buried with them.
I also notice that your scumbag pro-women’s rights moderator has deleted my comments. He, like you, supports women’s rights. He wishes men to be jailed for having relations with young females of childbearing age. He wishes men to be punished for marital rape. He wished men to be punished severly for the rape of an unmarried virgin girl, rather than simply have the man marry his prize and live happily with the sweet female.
I don’t know what you people want. I just know that you are never going to get it. Men get nowhere by begging or being “reasonable”. You will just waste your lives. I guess that is an apt happenstance as the pro-women’s rights policies you do support degrades the lives of all your fellow men.
Death To women’s Rights.
Viva Men’s Liberties.
PS: I also noticed that you banned me from commenting (many times), thanks faggots. I will remember this forever.
However, Thank you to Arpagus for being infavor of that which is to the interests of men. It would be a better world if, rather than having a pluralistic democracy, we instead has a olargarchy where only men like Arpagus held power, rather than quisling scum that most of the rest of the men of the “Men’s Rights Movement” are.
This was the same thing that MikeeUSA was spamming several threads on The Spearhead Forum with. The first line I bolded I didn’t even say. Someone else said that, although I agree that MikeeUSA has to be a feminist woman who is trolling. The second part I bolded is quite funny. Anyone who knows my history knows I’m a hardcore anti-feminist and anti-female supremacist. I have a long list of women telling me that I have a small dick from my science fiction post on The Spearhead last year as proof. I have also been pretty open about not being married and how I never will get married. I’m wondering where this “wife” that’s going to throw me in prison is going to come from.
Let’s take a look at the second email.
Snark (etc) February 28, 2010 at 09:18
[quote]PS: I also noticed that you banned me from commenting, thanks faggots.[/quote]
Nice work, Welmer. How about an IP ban this time?
Heh, IP ban. LOL.
You people are scum.
For all of human history men married sweet cute young females of childbearing age. People like you stop us now… and we want you gone.
Normal men appreciate young fertile females.
Worthless quislings do not.
You are the obstacle men need to grind into dust. You are the men who are our legistlative overloards, our judges, our jailers, our masters. You believe you do good by opposing nature and the interests of men.
It is bad for a man to be persecuted for taking for himself and unclaimed girl as his wife. It is bad for a man to be destroyed for having relations with his females at his will. It is bad for men to be denied the sweet brides they have always longed for (and in the past, before the acendancy of the Good Man, did aquire.)
You are the enemy of Man.
Your kind is the obstacle to our fulfillment.
You are the column of necessary masculinity that without which women’s rights would crash decisively against the rock that is the men of the world. You are their shield, and for us to get to claim our prize we must destroy you.
I wonder who this “we” he keeps talking about are. Of course, MikeeUSA has a huge army behind him, and if you believe that I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you. The Unabomber also talked used the word, “we”, and talked about how he was part of a group. We know that was wrong, and I am sure MikeeUSA is the same way.
If you want to know why “MikeeUSA” is probably a feminist troll, look at his obsession with 12 year old girls. Of course, “MikeeUSA” is trying to paint MRAs, MGTOW, and game practitioners are pedophiles. The reasons for that is obvious. Since we’re right, she is trying to discredit us through other means. However, notice “MikeeUSA’s” lack of talking about most any issue caused by feminism & other female supremacism that actually affects men. You might say what about the “wife” comment, but that doesn’t count because it makes no sense given the circumstances. “MikeeUSA” tried to make MRA, MGTOW, & game issues all about 12 year old girls.
As an aside I wouldn’t be surprised if Globalman was a similar type of troll. He does the same, “no issues affecting men matter” with his “you can reject the law” shtick. I have found several court cases of people trying that and failing miserably. Regardless, Globalman’s shtick conveniently avoids nearly all of the issues feminism and female supremacism have caused. Since we know it has already failed, it means nothing except that the issues never get dealt with, and men trying to claim that the law has no jurisdiction over them just look guilty.
Avoiding the issues affecting men could be a good test for finding feminist trolls.