Sep 102016
 

It has been 10 years since the Duke Lacrosse false rape accusation.  How does everyone who falsely accused the Duke Lacrosse players of rape, such as the faculty at Duke who supported this false rape accusations, feel about it now?  They have absolutely no remorse about it.  They don’t care that they were a part of a virtual lynch mob.

Additionally, there have been ZERO consequences for the Duke faculty who supported this false rape accusation.  Most of them are still working at Duke.  The rest are working at other universities.  In either case, it is safe to assume that they are pushing more false rape accusations.

Jun 112016
 

Jezebel Jizzabel decided to let everyone know that Gawker declaring Chapter 11 bankruptcy won’t stop them.  Jizzabel made it clear that they would “continue blogging here every day with the same, excellent staff” and gave some examples of their blogging:

Texas Man and Small-Time Dick Insists He Actually Has a Huge Dick, Everyone
A Timeline of Amber Heard and Johnny Depp’s Brief, Volatile Relationship
Beyond ‘Work’: Here Are the Songs of the Summer
What Happened to the Girl Behind ‘White Girl Problems’?

With hard hitting journalism like that from their “excellent staff”, Gawker should use declaring chapter 11 as an opportunity to put Jizzabel out of its, and more importantly our, misery.

Apr 012016
 

I found this group on the internet called the hybrid children community.  This is a group of women (mainly in their 20s) who think that aliens abducted them, had mind blowing sex with them knocking them up, and then took their hybrid human-alien children away from them.  (No, this is not an April Fools joke, but it should be.)

Obviously, these women are insane, but what would it mean if they weren’t?  It means that aliens are smart enough to know that what is best for their children is to keep them away from their mothers.  Aliens understand this at such a deep level that they abduct women from other planets who can’t follow them back to their home worlds. 

The women in the hybrid children community are incapable of having relationships with men.  This should be a surprise to no one.  While many men are willing to stick their dick into crazy, no man is that hard up that he won’t run in the other direction when meeting one of these women.  I’m certain that these women were just as insane before “discovering” that aliens were abducting them to have hybrid babies.  This is what happens to women who don’t get attention from men.  Thanks to MGTOW, the marriage strike, and so forth, more women will join the hybrid children community so that they can enjoy the delusion that alien men desire them.  I think I can speak for aliens everywhere when I say that alien men don’t want these women too.

Mar 262016
 

The anti-vaccination movement is responsible for the rise in measles (such as the Disneyland measles outbreak in 2015) and whooping cough.  Since the anti-vaccination movement is primarily made up of mothers and other women, this is something where women bear responsibility. On top of that, mothers are usually the ones making health care choices for their children so in almost all cases where a child is not vaccinated (for anything other than legitimate medical reasons), a woman is responsible.  This problem is made worse by divorce and that fact that women are responsible for most divorces.  Fathers have to fight their ex-wives to get their children vaccinated and protect their children.

What started all of this anti-vaccination nonsense was a discredited study linking vaccination to increased autism rates.  Not only was this study discredited to the point where the journal that published it chose to disavow it, the study was funded by a law firm on a fishing expedition to sue vaccine manufacturers.  Despite these facts, women immediately latched on this.  Why did this happen?  To understand the reason, one must understand that certain degrees of autism, particularly autism level 1 (or Asperger’s Syndrome as it used to be called), is not a debilitating disease but indistinguishable from ultra-masculine thinking (the type of thinking that drives innovation).  In fact, lower levels of autism, especially those that used to be called Asperger’s Syndrome, are likely to be nothing more than the medicalization of regular masculinity.  In other words, women believed the anti-vaccination conspiracy theory because of their fear and hatred of masculinity.  Not only is women refusing to vaccinate their children dangerous for their children’s health, it is particularly dangerous for their sons since those women in addition to endangering their health will be raising them in a cesspool of feminist/anti-male ideology.  This is another example of how women’s role as child-bearer is rapidly becoming unnecessary and in many cases even harmful.

Anti-vaccination propaganda is filled with fear and hatred of masculinity (in addition to many lies).  Women are comparing vaccinations to rape (including the non-existent college rape “epidemic”) with images such as these:

And written propaganda like this:

I have been thinking this morning about the parallels between vaccine-injury and sexual assault. I happened to hear a news story today about the incidence of rape on college campuses, and as I was listening, I could envision several commonalities.
In the story, a young woman was interviewed about her experience. She described a situation in which she had accompanied a young man to his dorm room and they had engaged in sex – both agreed and it was an interaction to which both gave informed consent. They both knew they were going to have sex before entering the dorm room and there was no force or coercion involved. There was an element of trust and equality in the decision-making process.
She said that afterward, she was ready to leave and when she got up to get dressed, the young man pushed her down onto the bed, and held her down while he turned up the stereo so her cries for help could not be overheard by neighboring students.
After the assault, the young woman reported the rape to campus police. The investigation was dropped and the rapist was not prosecuted. She sees him on campus and has classes with him, which she reported is extremely difficult and re-traumatizing for her.
Vaccination of our children is in many ways similar to medical rape.
We know the person who has harmed our infants and children. We trust them. We willingly go into the environment and we even participate in holding down the victims. In many cases, we have been in those rooms and participated willingly, albeit without truly informed consent, in the medical assault on our children (or on ourselves.)
In other cases, we entered those rooms with people we trusted, believing we were NOT going to engage in the act proposed by the perpetrator, only to be talked into it, shamed into it, threatened into it, coerced into it, or tricked into it with promises that, “This won’t hurt” or “It’s only going to hurt for a second” or “Come on… you know it’s the right thing to do… everyone else is doing it….”
Afterward, the perpetrators, pat us on the thigh or shoulder while looking us straight in the eyes and saying, “There now. That wasn’t so bad, was it?” They straighten their white coats, instruct us to get our things together, as they turn their backs and stride out of the room in search of their next victim. We may be left feeling afraid, and numb, not knowing how that happened and praying that it’s over. Praying they won’t come back and do it again, and praying there won’t be any lasting harm from what just happened.
In many cases, as we leave those rooms, feeling sick to our stomachs… dirty… with lumps in our throats and tears in our eyes, we force ourselves to take deep breaths and resolve to be stronger next time; more prepared to say NO and mean it.
For many of us, we ARE more prepared and we ARE able to say NO the next time. Others of us are not so strong.
Some of us resolve to change our lives and we seek new relationships, which are good for us and in which our decisions and our choices – our right to say NO is respected.
Some of us endure the worst when we realize that the medical assault inherent in the act of coerced vaccination is only the beginning, as our children or ourselves become sick, often within minutes or hours following the assault. It is at that point that we are suddenly faced with the horror that when we reach out to those who are supposed to help us, we must again confront the assailant and beg for assistance. Not only is the help denied, the assault is also denied and the harm minimized. We are told, “It’s nothing,” “You’re over-reacting,” – no different from the rapist’s claim, “It was consentual. After-all, you came here asking for it. What did you expect?” If there is ANY admission that what happened was harmful, the victim is blamed for the damage because “Everyone else does just fine. In fact, they keep coming back for more. They love it. It’s only those extremely rare individuals who are weak, or flawed, or physically or emotionally damaged to start with who don’t like it. The problem is not with the perpetrator, and certainly not with the act itself… it’s the victim. Something is wrong with that one…”
And just like the rape-victim in this morning’s radio story, we are continually re-traumatized when we encounter the rapist in public – in our churches, in the grocery store, at PTA meetings and community gatherings.
The medical rapist is empowered by laws that protect him (or her) from liability. There are no consequences when they harm us or our children and this has emboldened them to become even more callous in their actions.

I suppose the comparison to the non-existent campus rape “epidemic” is accurate.  Both anti-vaccination and the campus rape “epidemic” are lies.  They are also both led by women who want the end of due process.  The woman who wrote the above propaganda specifically complained about the police and the criminal justice system not providing a summary judgement against a supposed “rapist” so it is clear that she is against due process.

Elsewhere, vaccination gets called a “war on women”.  Conspiracy theorist, Jeff Rense, says vaccination is an attempt to secretly sterilize women.  Conspiracy theorist website, NaturalNews.com, specifically called vaccination, the “vaccine industry’s war on women”.  This proves (again) that conspiracy theorists are no friend of men and are willing to white knight at the drop of a hat.

Calling or implying that vaccination is a “war on women” is not limited to conspiracy theorists.  The simple act of pointing out that Jenny McCarthy, a leader of the anti-vaccination movement, has the facts wrong on vaccination is misogyny.  It would be bad enough if these false accusations of misogyny were just coming from anti-vaccination people.  However, even pro-vaccination people will defend these women by saying that the women were just reacting to the misogyny of (male) doctors and demand that you have sympathy for them.  Or they will falsely accuse you of misogyny for disagreeing with anti-vaccination women:

I love and respect science which I worked in for a decade. But, believing in science doesn’t mean I have to ignore non-science. Science can’t explain why acupuncture works but it does. Science says vitamin E doesn’t reduce pre-menstural breast tenderness but I have 20 years of experience that says otherwise. That’s fine. If the science isn’t there then the medical profession should steer clear but we – individual people – don’t have to steer clear. It is the same with vaccines.

Like the story of a mother whose daughter got a vaccine on Friday and by monday morning had pulled all of her hair out. She is a statistical anomaly and therefore her mother is just being hysterical. That’s misogyny. We have no respect for motherhood, mothers, or the choices women make for their families.

I have trouble believing that this woman ever worked in science unless “correlation does not equal causation” is now considered misogynist.  (There are probably plenty of women and maginas who think that way.)  As for not respecting “motherhood, mothers, or women’s choices”, women’s “choices” are endangering their own children and other people.  (And that doesn’t even address that fact that she thinks that fathers should have no say it what happens to their children.) For example, this woman who refusal to vaccinate her children caused all seven of them to get whooping cough, but this woman only endangered her own children.  What is worse is that these women who are refusing to vaccinate and endangering other people’s children and people who can not get vaccinations due to legitimate medical reasons.  People in the latter group are protected against various diseases by the rest of us being vaccinated (a.k.a. herd immunity).  When a woman refuses to vaccinate her children and someone else is injured or killed by that act, she could face civil or criminal liability because her intentional disregard for her own children’s health is injuring other people.

When you look at all of this together, it is clear that being anti-vaccination is anti-male.  In particular, the biggest victims of the anti-vaccination movement (besides those who have died as a result of women refusing to vaccinate their children) are boys who are being raised by anti-male feminist mothers.

Dec 222015
 

I found an article about how students in the Women & Gender Studies department of West Virginia University had a fair to show off what they learned in the last semester. This fair was supposed to show “real world applications” of their coursework. “Real world applications” to these women & gender studies students making penis piñatas.  I’m not joking, but I wish I was.

Since the goal of this women & gender studies fair was to show what students learn in those “subjects”, we are forced to conclude from the penis piñata that they learned to attack male genitalia with a bat. And they intend to attack male genitalia with bats in the future because the other purpose of this fair was to show “real world applications” of women & gender studies.

For comparison, let’s take a look at what an equivalent STEM fair would look like. (Put aside the fact that STEM students would be too busy with real work for such a thing.). Instead of making silly piñatas, there would be demos of computer softwaruse hardware and demos of various engineering fields from aerospace engineering to electrical engineering to materials engineering. These would all be things that have clearly improved people’s lives unlike penis piñatas. The only reason that a penis piñata would even be near such an event is because of women & gender studies students protesting a STEM fair. (They would protest because improving people’s lives is misogyny.)

In other words women’s studies is so useless that a penis piñata is considered a real world application of the subject.

Dec 082015
 

The National Science Foundation is spending money on something that is the complete opposite of science, making “gender sensitive computers”.  So far it has cost US taxpayers $345,000 over the last 2 years and more money will be spent on this between now and 2019.  Here is the stated goal of “gender sensitive computers”:

“The [Principal Investigator] PI’s long-term goal is to create theory to inform [Human-Computer Interaction] HCI design practices, to ensure the production of egalitarian designs that reflect all users’ values,” a grant for the project states. “In particular, she aims to create feminist theory for HCI, which she hopes will close the gap in women’s participation in computing.”

“Previously, the PI has shown how approaches to designing for women are questionable when viewed in light of feminist theory,” the grant continued. “Feminist scholars argue that the lack of women in computing further discourages women from pursuing programming-related careers, and that women are also excluded because technologies created by men better address male needs.”
The research will also explore “gender and technical identities” and the belief that computer system designs “alienate women.”

If the grant proposal was written a year later, I’m sure it would have included attacking #GamerGate as an example of this alleged conspiracy by male nerds to keep women out of the computing field.  Another goal of this waste of money is, “The project will teach middle and high school girls to “create technologies in keeping with their gender identity.”  In other words, we will end up with nothing but more vagina software.  (Hopefully, said vagina software won’t be created after eating vagina bread and drinking vagina beer.)

What is not understood here is that computers don’t have a gender, just as all inanimate objects don’t have a gender.  There is no such thing as a computer for women or a computer for men.  A “gender sensitive computer” is a contradiction in terms.  There is no conspiracy to make “male computers” or anti-female computers because such a thing is impossible.  Computers are already “egalitarian” because a computer will do anything a user tells it to do, and the computer can neither discern any gender characteristics about its user nor understand the meaning of it.  What is driving this so called “research” is not that computers are male or pro-male in any way.  What the feminists involved in this project can’t stand is that computers don’t treat female users any different than male users.  Like with so many other things such as government policy, what these women want is not equality but special privileges.  The problem for them is that a computer does not know how to give special privileges for women.  No matter what they do a computer will never give them what they want.  That will be true even when artificial intelligence is developed.

Dec 052015
 

Anon informed us that a woman named Zoe Stavri, who blogs under the name Another Angry Woman, has baked bread with her vaginal yeast.  She even tweeted about it under the hashtag, #cuntsourdoughShe also sent it to a couple of radio hosts without telling them that the bread was made from vaginal yeast until after they (and others at the radio station) ate it.

This is another example of women going filthy and feral and demonstrating their inability to handle modern civilization.  Zoe Stavri never considered whether it was safe to eat her vaginal bread.  (She also didn’t realize that the yeast used to make bread is completely different from the yeast found in her vagina.)  It is also similar to vagina software, how women only make software related to their vaginas (i.e. not getting pregnant, abortion, and so forth) when men aren’t around.  Just like with vagina software, Zoe Stavri couldn’t actually invent a new type of bread or an improvement on how the bake bread.  All she could add was her vagina.

One of the #cuntsourdough tweets responding to Zoe Stavri suggested using vaginal yeast to brew beer:

Again, we have another example of the vagina software phenomenon.  These women couldn’t come up with any new ideas in brewing beer so they just come up with vagina beer.  Like with the vagina bread, they also don’t consider whether vagina beer was safe to drink.  Ironically, the woman who made that tweet says that she is a supporter of “good food for all” in her Twitter profile.

Anon suggested I create a page documenting all of these examples of women who can’t handle modern civilization.  I have done that here, and that page will automatically update anytime I add a new article on this subject.

Oct 052015
 

There’s a new twitter hashtag out there called #PissForEquality.  Feminists are now pissing in their pants to show solidarity with rape victims who may have incontinence issues.  I AM NOT MAKING THIS UP.  Here are some examples:

There are some more examples at this link, but it is NSFW.   While #PissForEquality was started by 4chan to troll feminists, it’s disturbing how quickly feminists started pissing in their pants without questioning whether it was a good idea.  Some feminists are now using the hashtag, #PissOnPatriarchy.  I guess that is so they can piss in their pants even more.  Why would feminists want to piss in their pants?  Feminists have also argued that potty training oppresses women.  (Check the link.  It’s not a joke.)  When you know that feminists consider potty training to be oppression it makes sense that they would use any excuse to piss in their pants.  4chan had no idea what they were unleashing by trolling feminists in this manner.

You should have no trouble identifying feminists who #PissForEquality.  That’s because it’s practically a guarantee that they don’t take showers either.  It isn’t due to feminists being lazy (although that’s part of it).  Many feminists will want to keep the stink from pissing in their pants so that men will avoid them.  It’s just like how some feminists are using farts to keep men away from them.

I wasn’t surprised by feminists embracing #PissForEquality, and if you are a long time reader of this blog, you won’t be either.  I have been documenting how filthy (and feral) women have become.  There are even examples on TV of women pissing in their pants such as Snooki from MTV’s Jersey Shore a few years ago. (When Snooki wasn’t pissing in her pants, she pissed outside like a pet.) And it’s not limited to pissing. In response to the Jersey Shore example a few years ago, Slagmire gave us this example of filthy women:

I became friends with one of my university janitors recently. We shoot the shit early in the morning while I’m doing a little studying in my dorm lounge before class, so he tells me all kinds of crazy stories that the janitors share between each other when they all clock in before work.

He said a hefty chunk of the female janitorial staff is on the verge of quitting because the girls have taken to shitting in the showers when they’re drunk/hung-over, and it’s not just isolated incidents either. It’s gotten so bad that they’re pressuring the university to address the issue directly, and this is a “progressive” West Coast school too, so there you go.

Odd that the stereotype of the ogre man and the neurotically cleanly housewife is completely reversed for young men in their twenties like me.

Now if you’ll excuse me, I have to take my girlfriend outside before she poos on the rug again.

Unfortunately, I think Slagmire gave us a warning about what feminists will do next after #PissForEquality/#PissOnPatriarchy without realizing it.  Their next hashtag will be #ShitForEquality or #ShitOnPatriarchy where feminists will take a shit in their pants and post pictures of that on Twitter.  The scary thing is that 4chan could easily cause this to happen sooner rather than later.

Aug 212015
 

It’s bad enough that a lot of women aren’t showering and stink from that.  What’s worse is feminists trying to use their farts as a weapon against men:

I became less butt shy and tried my method out again the next day. It worked like a charm. Otherwise bravado men in suits shifted uncomfortably and discreetly moved further away from me. I had cracked the code on women’s dominance. It was invisible but had been there all along. Ladies, we can stink men into submission.

Thank goodness New York City is so loud. I fart everywhere now. I fart in the grocery store to get the men behind me in line to back up a notch. I fart on the ferry to get men to take their goddamned arm off the back of my seat. I fart at the gym to get the sweaty men to move on over and not take the machine right next to mine. I fart on the street to get men to slow their roll and keep a respectful distance behind me and not encroach on my personal space.

Humid days are the best because the fart hangs around longer. More bang for my butt. Carb-loaded days also tend to be beneficial as they give me more ammo to work with.

If women intentionally fart all the time, men will definitely stay away.  That’s assuming men don’t stay away already due to women’s body odor from not taking showers or because of these women’s horrid personalities.  I’m certain that feminists will try to give themselves irritable bowel syndrome just to have their bodies fart more.

A couple of years from now, I expect a follow up article where the author complains that men want nothing to do with her.  I’m sure there will be shaming language about how “real men should want women who fart all the time and have putrid body odor” and “filthy women are real women”.  Such shaming language won’t work on men because no man will want a woman that’s toxic both figuratively and literally.

Aug 182015
 

We have already seen women become filthier and filthier. Feminists have been saying that potty training oppresses women.  There are an increasing number of examples of women pissing and taking dumps anywhere but a toilet.  (And that includes everything from women taking dumps in showers to women pissing outside like a pet.)

That is bad enough, but it turns out that women are taking less and less showers.  In a British survey, nearly 80% of women admitted that they aren’t taking daily showers. Many women are even showering less than once every three days. (Additionally, two thirds of women in the survey don’t remove their makeup before they go to bed, and one eighth of women in the survey admitted to not brushing their teeth before they go to bed.)  At this rate, women are going to stop showering and taking baths.  In a hot month like August women are going to stink, and it will be a very nasty stink.  And that’s before adding on the stink from that will come from refusing to properly use a toilet.

This will be a just another reason for men to go their own way.  Very few men will choose to deal with women who continuously stink and are covered in a layer of filth.  It’s disturbing that women think that they can do this without men objecting to it.

Jun 212015
 

Since today is father’s day, I added a new page about how fatherhood and not marriage is essential for civilization.  I’m disabling comments on this post because all of the content is on the new page.  Follow the link or click on the tab at the top of the blog to read the page and comment on it.

Jul 192014
 

Back in February 2012, I wrote how young men were getting fed up with women faster than any other group of men based on a series of comments at The Spearhead.  Since then, that entry has become the most read page on this blog.  It still gets plenty of hits and even comments occasionally which is impressive considering that old content here typically only gets comments in the rarest of cases.  It’s because that page speaks to what a large group of young men are going through in dealing with women.  Young men’s frustration with women is only increasing so I wasn’t surprised by this comment I found on Dalrock’s blog:

No kidding! I have been paying special attention to young men at work between the ages of 25 & 30.I have coffee with them etc. The thing that I have noticed is what a ‘lack of respect’ that they have for women in general.I generally don’t have much respect for women myself….but,not like these guys! I mean they prey on them to use them without mercy.They treat them like garbage and use them at every opportunity.And the c**** are stupid enough to let them.The other thing that I have also noticed in the last few years is the number of men that “HATE” women……and I do mean “HATE”.I myself am into “sport sex”.Not these guys,they are into “grudge f*****g”.It is only going to get worse and women have no one to blame except themselves.

For young men their frustration with women is part and parcel of their understandable loss of respect for women.  For many young men, their frustration with women is rapidly turning into hate for women.  This is a natural and logical reaction by young men.  For their entire lives, women have been getting worse.  And unlike older men, they have no memory of a time when women didn’t engage in massive amounts of bad behavior bordering on being feral.  To these young men, the only thing women are good for is sex.  And not just any kind of sex, but “grudge fucking”.

The young men referenced in the above comment are between 25 and 30.  In a few years they will be between 30 and 35 to be replaced by a new group of young men who will have an even lower opinion of women.  Some old men who still have a positive opinion of women will have died off.  In other words, over time men who don’t hate women are likely to be replaced by men who are fed up with if not outright hate women.  We can see a difference in just a little over two years between the comment above and The Spearhead comments written back in 2012.  That’s how quickly this is happening, and it shows no signs of stopping.  Paul Elam gets emails from 16 and 17 year old teenage BOYS that are already fed up with women.  Just consider what their opinion of women will be when they’re between 25 – 30 or 30 – 35.  It’s going to be worse.  Eventually, this will hit critical mass.

Jun 152014
 

Happy Fathers’ Day to all of the fathers out there, especially those who are being denied access to their children by women and the courts.

Since today is Fathers’ Day, it’s a good time to talk about an example of how fathers are necessary in raising children.  Recently, actor, Terry Crews, was on The View and talked about the importance of fathers.  Jenny McCarthy, a single mother, took offense at that.  Crews did not say anything about Jenny McCarthy specifically or even single mothers specifically.  The simple act of speaking positively about fathers was enough to offend women.  Someone commenting on the Mens’ Rights Reddit summed it up very well:

“Fathers are important.”

“Are you calling me a bad mother?!”

While Terry Crews was not attacking mothers or Jenny McCarthy, the fact is that Jenny McCarthy is a bad mother.  She is endangering her children by being anti-vaccine and is partly responsible for the deaths and illnesses caused by a lack of vaccinations since she vigorously campaigns against vaccines.  On top of this, she has also said that she would rather have her children deal with diseases that vaccines prevent rather than get autism.  Several of these diseases are deadly or have the potential to be deadly.  In other words, McCarthy is saying she would have her children die than live with autism.  Given that autism (and what was formerly know as Aspergers Syndrome) is just medicalizing normal male behavior in many cases, McCarthy is basically equating vaccination with masculinity and saying it’s better to die than to be masculine.  When you consider all this Jenny McCarthy is a bad mother, and her children clearly need their father to protect them from her delusions.  This is an excellent example of why fathers are important.

May 222014
 

Sorry to disappoint everyone but there are no topless pics of women in this post.  Instead we have a new cartoon from EvilWhiteMaleEmpire about Vladimir Putin’s reaction to protests by feminists who went topless (in both English and Russian):what Putin really thinks of Femen (in English) what Putin really thinks of Femen (in Russian).

What these cartoons refer to is how Putin handled a recent protest by Femen and completely diffused Femen’s attetion whoring.  What Putin did was brilliant and made Femen look stupid.  If you want to see how stupid Femen looks thanks to Putin, then watch this episode of Portlandia.  While the Portlandia episode isn’t about Femen, it has animal rights protesters including a woman who keeps asking when she should take her top off over and over again.  Femen could have easily been a Portlandia sketch, and Putin pointed that out to the world.

Dec 112013
 

You may have heard about how Microsoft was creating a bra that would help stop women from emotional overeating.  It turns out that isn’t the case.  Even though Microsoft wasn’t working on a bra to stop women from overeating, it should.  There are certainly enough overweight women who need it.

While Microsoft is at it, they should also create litter boxes for women because feminists have been very successful convincing women that potty training and basic cleanliness oppresses women to the point where women are taking dumps in showers.  (Feminists are viewed as unhygienic and filthy for a reason.)  Given how filthy women are getting, I expect litter boxes for women and other products to help women clean themselves to be a growth industry (if women can be convinced to purchase and use them).  Microsoft needs to find new streams of revenue, and this is potentially a highly profitable one.

Nov 022013
 

It’s that time of the month.  Last month’s entitlement princess was Senator Barbara Boxer who represented all of the women who wanted to make last month’s government shutdown all about themselves.

The Entitlement Princess of the Month can only keep going with your support so keep submitting new entitlement princesses on the Entitlement Princess of the Month submission page.

This month there will be no voting again because there is another clear winner, the American female employees of British law firm, Clifford Chance.  The Women’s Committee at Clifford Chance sent a memo to all of Clifford Chance’s American female employees requesting professional dress and behavior from them such as wearing proper business clothing, not showing cleavage, and not giggling all the time.  Many of Clifford Chance’s American female employees objected to this memo requesting basic professional dress and behavior complaining among other things that the memo didn’t apply to men.  (It’s not like men could go around showing cleavage.)  These women believe that they are entitled to not having to follow a basic standard of professionalism in the workplace, and it’s this belief that earned them the October 2013 Entitlement Princess of the Month.

Oct 052013
 

A couple days ago Miriam Carey, a woman from Connecticut, was involved in a car chase here in DC where she rammed a barricade at the White House eventually leading to police having to shoot her.  Carey was suffering from several forms of mental illness including postpartum depression, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia.  Carey’s boyfriend (and father of her child) had to call the police twice on her last year because of her mentally ill behavior that was dangerous to their daughter.  Carey even believed that President Obama was going to lockdown her hometown, had her put under electronic surveillance, was stalking her, and that she could communicate with the President.  Despite all of this a social worker believed that Carey was “100% better” at the beginning on this year.  Obviously, this was wrong.

There is a lot of denial about Carey’s mental illness.  Carey’s family is denying that she was bipolar and schizophrenic.  Instead, Carey’s family is saying that she only had postpartum depression.  Carey’s family is denying that she was bipolar and schizophrenic despite that fact that she was being treated for it and that there is a family history of schizophrenia.  What is with all of this denial?  Why did a social worker think that Carey was “100% better” at the beginning of this year?

Miriam Carey’s mental illness weren’t taken seriously because she’s a woman.  The standards for mental sanity are much for stringent for men.  Had the standards of mental sanity applied to men, also applied to women, then Carey would never have had the opportunity to go to DC to try and get to Obama.  She never would have been shot.  Why aren’t the standards for mental sanity the same for men and women?  Obviously, they should be.  That’s another result of feminism.  If doctors and social workers actually tried to apply the same standards for mental sanity to women, feminists would be up in arms yelling about how “women’s natural ways of thinking are being declared a mental illness by the patriarchy”.  Feminists need a lesser standard of mental sanity for women for many reasons from a justification of female bad and feral behavior to making things like the false abuse industry possible.

Since feminism is so pervasive, neither a social worker (who is a part of a profession that is very sympathetic to feminism) nor Carey’s family believed that Carey was mentally ill (beyond postpartum depression).  This isn’t the fault of the DC police who had to take extreme measures.  Until feminism is forced out of the mental health and social work fields, there will be more Miriam Careys that the police will have to deal with in the future.

Sep 062012
 

It’s time to talk about filthy sluts again.  A recurring theme with filthy sluts is that the piss and take dumps everywhere but a toilet.  There have been plenty of examples from Snooki of MTV’s Jersey Shore pissing outside like a pet to college chicks taking dumps in showers.  The latest example of a filthy slut come from the Bad Girls Club Mexico.  Follow this link to watch a clip from that show.  In that clip one of the bad girls really has to piss.  She’s in a limo with the other bad girls so she finds a bucket, pulls down her skirt, and pisses into the bucket.  Later, when she exits the limo, she gives the piss filled bucket to some guy to deal with.

That last part is a very apt metaphor for how men have to clean up after women.  Whether its men building plumbing systems to efficiently deal with waste, or having to deal with a bucket of women’s piss, it’s all the same.

However, that is beside the point.  Here we have another example of how a toilet is becoming a completely foreign object to women.  Eventually, women will have no idea what a toilet is.  We’re going to need litter boxes for women in the future.  Women litter will be next to kitty litter in the grocery store.  This is the result of feminists saying that potty training oppresses women.

Jun 172012
 

There’s a TV show called Hotel Impossible on the Travel Channel.  It’s about this guy, Anthony Melchiorri, who is a specialist in turning around failing hotels.  Each episode he turns around a struggling hotel, and these hotels usually have a lot of problems.  A typical problem that these hotels have is cleanliness.  Cleanliness was a big issue in this past week’s episode.  Melchiorri inspects a room at the hotel he is turning around, and this room had an extremely FILTHY bed.  There were puke stains, piss stains, blood stains, and shit stains on various sheets and the bed.

While the hotel in question was falling down on the job in cleaning their rooms, how did these beds get so FILTHY from body fluids?  From my previous post, it’s obvious that it’s the result of several women (or maybe just one woman).  Think about that next time you’re staying in a hotel, particularly if the room is filthy.

Jun 152012
 

When I predicted that feminists would start saying that potty training oppresses women, I didn’t think my prediction would come true so soon.  However, it has.  I found an example of a feminist saying that potty training oppresses women:

I re-picked up a book that I bought as a freshmen in college.  I can’t believe I read this whole thing!  It is called the Power of Beauty by Nancy Friday.  Here is a quote from the book, this particular quote is from sex educator Judith Seifer.  This is just yet another thought exercise to show how nutty and departed from reality feminists are.

“Girl babies are plopped on a toilet, they’re not to look at themselves, they’re not to touch themselves, but they are instructed that this is a body function they must manage, control…. Girl babies are given a consistent message of contamination, that what you have down there is dark, it’s dirty, you don’t touch it.  After they do urinate the next thing they are taught to do is to wipe themselves clean with lots of toilet paper, and then to wash, wash their hands until clean.  Boys, on the other hand, are taught to hold their penis, to aim it, and we give them great praise when the stream of urine hites the toilet bowl.”
There you have it.  A feminist is saying that potty training and cleanliness in general oppresses women.  When we say feminism poisons society, that isn’t meant just figuratively anymore.  It’s now literal since feminism is against potty training, cleanliness, and sanitation.  The greatest public health achievement of the last 150 years isn’t vaccinations or any other advancement in medicine.  It’s sanitation because the best way to keep yourself healthy is from not wallowing in your own shit.  Feminism want to undo the great achievement of sanitation.  If you don’t want to be living in a three feet deep pile of filth, feminism has to be defeated.
Mar 152012
 

When I wrote my post about filthy sluts, I thought it would be more of a future prediction of where women are heading.  Instead, I got a lot of stories about how widespread the filthy slut phenomena currently is.  Slagmire’s comment is a good example:

I became friends with one of my university janitors recently. We shoot the shit early in the morning while I’m doing a little studying in my dorm lounge before class, so he tells me all kinds of crazy stories that the janitors share between each other when they all clock in before work.

He said a hefty chunk of the female janitorial staff is on the verge of quitting because the girls have taken to shitting in the showers when they’re drunk/hung-over, and it’s not just isolated incidents either. It’s gotten so bad that they’re pressuring the university to address the issue directly, and this is a “progressive” West Coast school too, so there you go.

Odd that the stereotype of the ogre man and the neurotically cleanly housewife is completely reversed for young men in their twenties like me.

Now if you’ll excuse me, I have to take my girlfriend outside before she poos on the rug again.

That last sentence had me ROTFLMAO.

Even being drunk, what makes a woman think that taking a dump in a shower is a good idea?  I think this is the end result of feminism.  We have women effectively thinking and acting as if they’re exempt from basic hygiene for being women.  Feminists attack basic health facts like being overweight or worse yet obese is bad for your health and claim that being thin is a patriarchal system of oppression.  Soon we will see feminists talking about how basic hygiene and using toilets for urination and taking dumps is part of a patriarchal system of oppression that keeps women down.  In other words, feminists will be saying that women are oppressed by potty training.

Feb 102012
 

Sluts over time increase their slutiness.  Eventually there gets to a point where a slut has reached maximum slutiness.  Or is there?  Is that point just an inflection point to a new frontier of slutiness?  I think the answer is that there is a new frontier of slutiness coming, and that frontier is being filthy.  I don’t being filthy in a good way as in sexual filthiness.  I mean literal filthiness as in sluts who don’t regularly wash themselves.

I came to this conclusion last night when I was watching Jersey Shore on MTV.  I was watching both last week’s episode (which I didn’t get a chance to watch last week) and this week’s episode.  Last week’s episode featured Snooki being very filthy.  (Beyond everything else I’m going to talk about, this episode is very entertaining because it has Deena and Sammi trying to figure out electricity unsuccessfully, and the Situation having his fly unzipped and dick sticking out for a long time without him realizing it.)  It starts out with Snooki pissing on in her pants in a club.  Does Snooki go home and and take a shower?  Of course not.  She takes what she calls a “shore shower” and just sprays herself with a lot of perfume.  Snooki doesn’t even remove her piss soaked panties until the next morning.

It turns out that Snooki has a urinary tract infection.  She says it’s because of all the sex she’s having, yet most people have sex without ever having a UTI.  Clearly, it has to do with her lack of hygiene.

Later in the episode she has to piss, but all the bathrooms in the house are occupied.  So what does Snooki do?  She pisses outside, and those of us who watched the episode get to see her piss outside.  One of the other roommates says, “She drinks out of bowls and pisses outside.  We don’t need pets.”

If you read any message board about Jersey Shore like board at Television Without Pity, one thing that comes up from time to time is the lack of hygiene of the Jersey Shore cast.  This isn’t atypical for them.

I’m convinced being filthy is the next frontier of slutiness.  Increasing slutiness is basically increasing bad behavior by women that they expect men to accept.  A failure to adhere to standards of basic hygiene would be consistent with this.

In the future, this is going to be something I’m going to have to watch with my women.  I naturally assumed that any woman I get now or in the future would know how to wash themselves since they are presumably functioning adults.  This is no longer an assumption I can make.  As soon as this starts being a problem, I’m heading back to being celibate.  I’m not a cleanliness freak by a long shot, but this is seriously disgusting, and I don’t want to know what organisms are growing on these filthy sluts.  I knew there would get to a point where I would be heading back to celibacy, but I didn’t think it would have to do with women having a lack of hygiene.

This will add another reason for guys to use alternatives to women such as porn now and VR sex in the future.  All of those “virtual women” know how to wash themselves.  If things are going the way of women getting increasingly filthy, then it’s another reason that virtual women will be superior to real women.

Translate »