Feb 232011
 

Over the last several days we have heard the usual litany of complaints about The Spearhead and MRAs with respect to the “language” we use.  The (Not) Thinking Housewife complained about our “evil” profanity and from other places came the usual nonsense about how “scary” our language is or how we’re “scaring away women and other moderates who support us”.  (“Scary” language is code orange shaming language, and “scaring away moderates” is used so much it should become it’s own category of shaming language.)

Zed explained what this is really all about:

That wasn’t my actual experience, Mr. Billy Goat Gruff, I was using that as an analogy for what always happens on these boards. I wrote a post not long ago how men are demanded to act like robots and how no women and few men even acknowledge their humanity. We must follow the programming they are trying to shove down our throats at all times. Men’s pain is absolutely taboo to even speak of.

Peter Nolan has had everything he worked for for more than 20 years of his life stolen from him, been betrayed in the foulest possible manner and lied about by the woman who vowed to “cherish” him until “death do us part”, lost his children, and everyone just sort of skips over those inconvenient facts to tell him that he shouldn’t be so forceful when he talks about it, and should “tone it down.”

Men have no place to go to express their pain, anger, and anguish among other men who understand. Everyone wants to 2nd guess how he “should” be saying it, so that they don’t have to listen to or acknowledge what he is saying. It is just one subtle way that is used to suppress and silence men.

I likened it to someone who is seriously injured and in pain having that pain ignored and instead having everyone critique how he expresses it.

Zed is correct.  All this talk about how a man should be speaking about these issues is a subtle attempt to silence men.  If a man can’t communicate the severity of a problem, then he can’t communicate the real nature of that problem.  On top of that it doesn’t matter what a man says or how severe he says it when it comes to mens rights issues.  We could completely eliminate all profanity from our blog posts and comments and have them triple checked by lawyers to not offend anyone.  It wouldn’t matter.  No matter how good or bad our language is we would still get these accusations since it’s all about silencing men.

Talk about “scaring away moderates who support us” is similar in its attempt to silence men.  If men don’t speak out about these issues, any “moderates” we might gain would be offset by the fact that they would have no knowledge of the real issues or their severity.  And a lot of the “moderates” aren’t really moderates.  They’re just hiding their misandry through triangulation.  A real moderate who supports us wouldn’t spend years denouncing the “scary” language of The Spearhead and how it scares away moderates.  A real moderate who supports us would look more like Glenn Sacks.  If Sacks is aware of The Spearhead he may think it’s too extreme but that doesn’t stop him from his work in fathers rights, reforming the (anti-)family court system, ending false accusations, etc.  He doesn’t complain on his blog over and over again about the “scary men on The Spearhead”.  In fact these “moderates who support us” never say a word about men like Glenn Sacks much less try to work with them.  This is just proof that the “moderates who support us” are neither moderate nor do they support us.

Attempting to silence men will not work.  Pretending the problem doesn’t exist does not make it go away.  In fact it will make the problem worse.  If you’re worried about “scary” language now, you haven’t seen anything yet.  Just wait until 2015 or 2020 when the current generation of boys start becoming adults.  They have experienced the boot of feminism on their necks way worse than anyone reading this probably has.  The Spearhead as it is now will seem tame in comparison.

Feb 012011
 

Yes, that’s billion with a B.  Valerie Joyce Wilson Turks is suing P Diddy for $900 billion in child support and another $100 billion for “loss of income” for a grand total of $1 trillion dollars. Turks’ son, Cornelius Wilson, is 23 years old.  She’s claims P Diddy is the father but she waited to sue until 5 years past the age of becoming an adult.  It gets even better.  She claims P Diddy date raped her 24 years ago then 18 years after that raped her again and sexually abused her children.  In addition, Turks claims that P Diddy along with his ex-girlfriend Kim Porter and Rodney King are responsible for the collapse of the World Trade Center on 9/11.  Read what this woman had to say in her own words:

[Diddy] went through Kim Porter and Rodney King and knocked down the WTC and then they all came and knocked my children down. Set me up to be on disability and disabled my baby. he put my baby in a wheelchair.

He date raped me 24 years ago and knocked me down him and Kim Porter and Wallace Wright, then Sean Combs and Kim and Wallace Wright came back 18 years later and raped and sexually abused my children and knocked my children down and crushed me and my children daily.

Those are her words exactly.  While I doubt P Diddy will have to pay any child support, he is still going to have to pay for lawyers to deal with this woman.  This lawsuit shouldn’t have been taken seriously at all.  Turks should have been hauled away by guys in white coats instead of being allowed to waste the time of an actual court.  Too often mental illness is women is regarded as normal female behavior and this seems to be a case of that.  A man would not be able to take a lawsuit this crazy this far.

I have said half joking and half seriously that we will eventually see reptile alien conspiracy mythology become a part of the false rape industry. (A very minor part but a part none the less.)  We’re not there yet but with this woman claiming that P Diddy was responsible for the WTC in a obviously nuts child support lawsuit, we’re getting closer.  The reason why it will happen is because these things aren’t being immediately thrown out due to obvious insanity.  Expect crazier and crazier lawsuits of this nature from women.

Even if you think I’m wrong about this, consider that these crazy lawsuits from crazy women allow other women to get away with slightly more crazy, immoral, and/or unethical behavior than they do now both in court and out.  This happens because the standard of sanity for women gets defined down so more and more insane behavior from women gets considered normal and sane.  Fifty years ago if I said that women would be using false claims of child abuse in divorce cases, for example, I would be regarded as nuts.  But that has happened.  One reason why it happened was that women weren’t held to the same standard as men when it came to the law.  Sane behavior for women has been defined down far enough that a lawsuit like this against P Diddy where he gets accused of “knocking down the WTC” can go as far as it has.  Every little bit makes the problem worse, and this lawsuit is a big bit.

Translate »