Pro-male/Anti-feminist Tech

 

I added a new page called The Truth About (Anti-)Family Courts.  It has some really important information that needs to be read and disseminated.  I’m disabling comments on this post because all of the content is on the new page.  Follow the link or click on the tab at the top of the blog to read the page and comment on it.

 

A post over at The Spearhead a few days ago brought up how men under 30 are more clued in about women than anyone other age group of men.  Several comments basically communicated the fact that men under 30 are increasingly fed up with women:

Thanks for mentioning us younger guys. As a under 30 millenial, I will tell you exactly why most of us have this outlook.

We are the divorce generation. Even if we grew up in families that weren’t divorced we were still latch key kids.

Not only did I, a little over a decade ago, have more friends with single mothers by choice but also with divorced parents than intact families I also went to school with girls and came of age during the grrl power of the 90s.

This idea of women as victims falls on deaf ears when you spend year after year dealing with fucking cunts.

Team vagina can tell me all day long about how women would never lie about birth control or use men for child support and so on.

But, I know better. The high school I went to, a little over a decade ago, had a Teen Mom(watch that show on MTV if you want a realistic look) or two in almost every single class I had.

I literally only had one class in high school that didn’t have a pregnant girl in it. Several had two or three, out of 30 or 35 students and not enough book. Gotta love shitty high schools in the south.

That is just high school. If you look at reddit and the mens rights section in particular you will see that most of the guy are about my age(maybe a few years older) or younger.

Even the guys that aren’t in the MRA section on reddit have a very warped view of women and relationships. I think this is due to being born in the divorce generation.

Who needs to burn their own hand to find out that fire is hot when you can watch dozens upon dozens of older men burn their hands and scream in pain? Who needs that, so to speak?

This doesn’t even begin to talk about growing up in a feminized education system or the entitlement issues run rampant that most young women have or all the other issues.

To put it simply: You can’t kick a dog and not expect it to eventually bite the hand that feeds.

Guys of my generation have been kicked since we were puppies, and we were kicked constantly and from everyone who supposedly loved and cared for us.

There is a groundswell of MRAism and misogyny and just a lot of pissed off guys for one reason or another.

I haven’t, for example, met a single guy in his 20s who hasn’t had alteast one or more psycho bitch crazy ex gfs.

There is a reason that guys on reddit have a saying that goes like this: “dont stick your dick in crazy.”

There is also a reason that feminists have gotten so angry over young men and what young men say that they have created a very hostile troll group on reddit called Shit Reddit Says, or SRS. This SRS group exists to do nothing more than attack MRAs and other young men and mock them.

I suggest you don’t spend too much time looking at their shit, but if you haven’t heard about them before then I do suggest you head to reddit and search for them and take a look at their subreddits. They are a perfect example of the crazy cunts that guys like me have had to deal with growing up. They have no argument or abilit to even discuss topics, they simply mock and jeer.

As far as this article goes, I agree. Not only that but the MRM is making headway as far as getting out message out.

This article is full of female projection and female hope but it also uses the term hypergamy, which I first read about in Devlins work and the MRM.

Marriage Suits Educated Women:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/12/opinion/sunday/marriage-suits-educated-women.html?_r=1

THe comments are interesting to say the least. All sorts of older single women complaining about how the article isn’t true, cause men are afraid of educated women(lol). I suggest you all check it out.

The simple truth is that I, and I suspect most guys (especially of my generation), simply get tired of the constant competiveness and bitchy demeanor of western women. Especially the hyper educated (with liberal arts masters) who want to rub it into our faces constantly.

Unlike men of older generations I have had more girlfriends than most older guys had in their entire lives before I turned 21. I can honestly say that women do not add any value, outside of the value of pussy and sex, to a mans life.

Even with great sex it gets fucken old, it wears you down and makes you tired, having to constantly deal with the power struggles in modern relationships.

I haven’t even lived with a girl and I am sick of it. After I got out of my longest LTR a few years back, it only lasted about 3 yrs, I was just drained. It felt like my soul had been sucked out or something.

Women aren’t companions these days. They are ruthless competitors at work, at school, and even in our relationships.

Why would I or any other guy, especially us younger guys who learned this the hard way, give one fuckin shit about women?

In the last three weeks I have had three times where a group of young women, college girls from the University down the stree, asked me for help while I was driving. Each time I told them to fuck off.

One of those times was last night. I was at a drive through and it was cold and raining out. This hot blonde chick tapped on my window and asked me if I would give her and her friends a ride down the street so they wouldn’t have to walk home in the cold rain. I told them to fuck off. I am not a limo or taxi service. They could have offered to give me a group blowjob and the most that would have happened would have been me jizzing on their face and then riding off. TBH, I wouldn’t have even done that. Last thing I want to deal with is a false rape claim.

Women have pissed away any good will guys my age used to have towards them. If you don’t believe me then simply look at markets and see what sells to young men and see how young men view women.

Go and look at online forums based around video games and you will see young men talking shit about girls their age. Hell, get on some feminist sites and you will see feminists complaining about young guys, teenage guys, talking constant shit about women. Look at reddit and you will see it too. Look at any male oriented areas and you will see it.

Look at rap music or the proliferation of the word gold digger. Women are worthless these days, especially after or before sex. I think they are realizing it too. There is no happy ever after. There is no ’till death do us part’, cause we all know that women are branch swingers or monkeys. They won’t let go of one branch until their hands are firmly planted on another branch.

Oh and Branch = cock. Females tend to call it serial monogamy.

Fuck that shit. They won’t love you. They will just treat you as a utility object. A fucking ATM or sperm donor or human shield or emotional tampon/shrink or a dildo or a rock to lean on and so on.

My point is this. What do women have any more??? Pussy is cheaper to come by, especially if you know some game, than candy on halloween. They can’t cook or clean worth shit. They are honest. They aren’t equal to any degree, especially 99% of them.

What do women have to offer besides a funhole to play with for 45 minutes? They suck as friends, shit they give their own friends eating disorders and call them frenemies.

WTF do women have to offer? I think it is very little and I think young men are figureing this out every day.

I think women are realizing that their gravy train is coming off the tracks and are scared shitless. I think many, if not most, young men wouldn’t allow a woman to go back to the kitchen and be barefoot even if the women begged for them to be allowed to be kept. I think women know this and I think that is why they are getting even more bitchy.

I think this will only backfire for women as a whole and I am looking forward to seeing it all fall apart. This comment is long enough, so I will just say nice article.

Here’s another comment agreeing with the previous comment:

I will agree with Troll King’s assement of the men of the Millenial generation. We have seen a lot going through high school, but especially college. We have seen women engaging in hypergamy and relastionship games without them even keeping up the pretense of “Romance.”

It could be put down to the bitterness and schadenfruede of the “famous dateless losers.” But then we ask, “why are we dateless?” Because we can’t compete with the vapid game of the player, okay but what does that say about women? Because we cannot compete with the empowered career female to satisfy her hypergamous needs, okay but doesn’t that then mean love and romance are hyporcitical games and thus make woman a liar?

Back in college my one buddy was really into a band, Reel Big Fish, and we were driving aroudn once musing when he put on a song of their’s in whcih the story is about a girl who snubbed the band leader when he was starting out, but since he has been successful has returned to seek his attention. So my friends turns to me and says, “fuck these bitches, they go to college and slut it up, then expect to find a nice guy who makes money after he gets a career. Who wants a used up whore?” Remember this was the mid 00′s so we thought success would be ours, if not for the mancession.

The problem from the female perspective is their narrow focus, there are still little bitch men who will put all there energy into a relationship just to have pussy validation. So when these females have their girlfriend with a dick, they make sure their social circle consists of other attatched females. Even other females who are not at the same standing as them do not exist in the her world. These are also the type of men who are so debased as to have no self-respect, virtue, or honor.

An example, a buddy of mine had this female friend from high school who was the biggest slut you could know, if she went out drinking she was out fucking. He has a fuck buddy relationship with her, and she starts dating some new guy, some bouncer who is a shy mangina. One night they are out drinking, bouncer boy goes in the back to lay down, and my buddy starts banging her on the couch, bouncer boy comes out afterwards to see them naked on the couch. Now this guy is such a mangina that he can’t accept what just happened and buys the excuse that it was just drunken making out.

This was about two years ago, mangina bouncer is still with the slut. I guess he is the loser who will marry her.

However the inbalance will still get to them as there are still large numbers of unattached females (because guys like Troll King, at least six of my buddies, and me are not taking them on) who will compete with the attatched female for her man. Women have no inate sense of right and wrong, so there is no level they won’t sink to, us Millenial guys noted this when younger when we learned “the best way to attract girls is to have one already.”

I have one friend who was a little weenie science dude back in college, only got ass once when some born again virgin girl in his Bible study group tunred into a cock-snatching harpy on him, needless to say when the group found out she became the victim and he the evil leacher. He had another relationship with a psycho woman who ultimately rejected him because he didn’t measure up to her previous soccer playing boyfriend. So now he has bulked up, gotten into adventure sports, and is getting a masters in engineering, and rutting through the university girls.

We can see that our inate value as a person for reasons of love, does not matter except for maybe a pump and dump. So why emotionally invest in some joke, we are not women who change with the wind. A romantic blow to our psyche’s are not solved by wine parties and shaking our asses in public.

My generations of fellows are at heart nihilistic, vicious, and with very little pretense of conscience. This is because we are informed by a type of moral philosophy, brought on by the moral degeneracy in family, society, law, and relationships. We implicitly understand social contract as it applies to relationships.

They can fight back with all the laws and shaming they want, but we are men and we will adapt and survive. Let us maintain the imbalance and drive it to a fever pitch.

Another comment:

Really? I don’t know how old you are, but I can promise you that guys under 30 are fed up with women. We had to grow up next to the most entitled and bitchy group of females that ever walked this planet.

Just look at popular culture. Whether its rap music or rock music or TV or movies.

Just compare film from 50 years ago to film today. Or music.

Were there concepts back in the day similiar to gold diggers? Were men writing music about how horrible and slutty women were? I know there are some types of music that are fairly old that deal with those issues….namely some blues and jazz and country. But even that stuff doesn’t hold a candle to what you might hear on the radio today.

And another comment:

Male, 26.

I agree 100% with what Troll King has said. This mirrors my experiences (in AUS). More than half my friends in school didn’t have fathers, and although it wasn’t quite as bad as 1-2 per class, there were several girls I knew who were pregnant before 15. Some of them even knew who the father was… occasionally. Heck, one of my female friends had three children by the time she was 16, and all to different fathers.

Whatever good will I had for women ended in high school. I’ve had a few GFs since then, hoping I’d find one that wasn’t crazy, but they all are. NAWALT? Fucking yes they are.

My folks don’t help either. I tried to talk to them about it when I noticed it towards the end of high school (age 15-17). Dad could see the problem but still (even now) believes that the women who do this are in the minority. mum just refuses to see a problem and says I’m being silly. Her favourite word is misogyny. I have no idea how they’ve managed to stay married for almost 30 years.

Women are emotional vampires. They don’t bring anything of value to a relationship (I’m a qualified Chef, so I don’t need a cook. Washing machines are literally 2 button pushes) except for sex, and quite frankly, I don’t have to hug my Fleshlite afterwards. I also don’t have to worry about it lying to me about contraception. Also the sex is better!

No, women don’t have any social currency left. Girls are stupid, throw rocks at them.

And a portion of another comment:

One of the major things I have noted is the disconnect between the 30 something men and the 20 something men. Especially in regards to women and relationships (I am speaking in the general population, not the MRM): my group are functioning nihilists, while the older men still have the delusion of hope. My initial thought was a difference between the Gen-Xers having lived their lives during relative prosperity and influence from a resurgent social progresivism. Then I realized that there was a major cultural shift, similar to the rise of Jazz and the roaring 20′s in the early 20th century.

I recommend reading the full comment thread because for brevity’s sake I only included a few comments.  Men under 30 are getting fed up with women at a very fast rate.  There are a lot of men who decided to go ghost after getting fed up with women, but getting fed up with women took these men decades.  Paul Elam has talked about how he has gotten emails from teenage boys, 16 and 17 year olds, saying that they’re fed up with women.  The younger a man/boy is, the more feminism and crap from women he has had to deal with each day.  Teenage boys have now experienced the same amount of crap from women that an older man wouldn’t have gotten until he was at least 40.

As these men and boys have gotten exponentially more crap from women, women are doing less.  First, women stopped learning basic life skills like cooking.  Now, many young women are giving up on showering and basic hygiene (like I talked about recently).  I imagine that the many boys in the next crop of teenagers (if not current teenage boys) are going to get even more disgusted with women and girls than they are now because they are literally getting FILTHIER.  The smarter teenage boys will keep their dicks away from these cesspools of God knows what.  This will be helped along by technology like VR sex because technology can’t give you a STD or some other disease.  (Plus, it will probably be cleaner as in a lack of dirt/filth.)  Add that to the fact that these young men have been assaulted constantly by feminism since the day they were born, and the results as they get older will be explosive.

The good news about this is that the MRM will in the coming years and decades get a massive infusion of manpower and energy.  The bad news is that the men in charge of the MRM right now don’t really get what young men are going through now so they are ill prepared to handle the influx of all these young men.  Maybe that’s not a bad thing because these young men don’t need help figuring out who is causing them trouble.

 

There are several blogs that claim to be feminist and support men.  Even Hooking Up Smart would fall into this category because it’s AFINO (anti-feminist in name only) and gynocentric to the core.  Telling the truth at these blogs gets you banned.  Hollenhund and Clarence discovered this.

Hollenhund was banned from Hooking Up Smart for posting this inconvenient truth:

Making women suffer wouldn’t achieve anything in itself – I’m pretty sure the overwhelming majority of the Manosphere would agree. Women are normally solipsistic and they fail to understand their own urges and don’t comprehend the connection between cause and effect. They’d never understand why they’re suffering in the first place. Suffering only motivates them to fish for male sympathy (and thus investment) through crying and whining, to blame ‘ bad men’ for their ‘misfortune’ and thus play the game of ‘let’s you and him fight’. That’s how it has always been.

So making women suffer is largely pointless. I’d go further and say it’d actually be detrimental to men because it encourages white-knighting and intra-male competition, for the reasons I mentioned above. Not to mention the fact that many women actually seem to find some sort of twisted pleasure in suffering, that all this’d simply serve to justify more anti-male legislation and whatnot.

And the notion of making women ‘admit their faults’ is pie-in-the-sky as well. Again, I’m sure pretty much everyone in the Manosphere would agree. You have a bigger chance of seeing pigs fly. If women are to recognize their faults in this SMP, they need to have a realistic picture of both their own sexuality and the SMP in the first place, plus they need to have empathy for beta males, plus they need to be imbued with the sense of morality without which the very concept of ‘fault’ is meaningless. I think we’ll sooner see Haiti become a dreaded military superpower.

That was too much truth for Susan Walsh to handle so Hollenhund got banned.  I’m sure he will get added to Susan Walsh’s list of MRAs and MGTOW that are working for the Rockefeller-Illuminati-Reptile Alien Cabal.

Clarence got banned for No Seriously What About The Menz? for positing this truth:

I recently got banned from No Seriously What About the Men apparently for a SINGLE COMMENT (about Rosie O, comparing her to a whale) that I made in the comments section in response to comments by women about how unattractive a certain feminist was (and I actually said that particular feminist -not Rosie O – was ok looking) and..get this..ON A WHOLLY DIFFERENT BLOG.

I will admit that I have a problem with comparing Rosie O’Donnell to whales because it’s an insult to whales.  That still isn’t a reason to ban someone from a blog.

These are just two examples of how feminist/gynocentric blogs that claim to support men in reality don’t.

 

There’s a new show on the Discovery channel called Bering Sea Gold.  It’s one of those reality TV shows that show blue collar men working in remote regions of the world.  In this case, it’s about men from Nome, Alaska who are mining the seafloor of the Bering Sea for gold.

I’m not that interested in that type of show, but I usually like to catch an episode or two of these shows to confirm a theory I have about them.  That theory is that there will never be more than one woman who is a regular on this kind of TV show.  The reason for that is because when there’s real (and hard) work to be done, women are nowhere to be found.  It’s men who get real work done.  Sometimes, you will see one woman on this type of show, but no more because she’s the token chick.  This is probably because the producers didn’t want to feature men exclusively.

My theory held with Bering Sea Gold.  There’s only one woman who is mining gold, and she clearly is the token chick.  This chick is trying to earn money so she can pay to get a Masters degree in opera in Europe.  Apparently, she thought gold mining would be a good way to get cash.  Her main purpose seems to be showing cleavage to the camera (which she has done a few times) and screwing up.  To mine gold from the seafloor or the Bering Sea someone dives down from their boat and takes a massive vacuum to suck the top of the seafloor into a machine that sorts the gold from the dirt.  This works because the gold is in tiny pieces and on the top of the seafloor due to various natural processes.  The first time the token chick dived down, she wasn’t careful, and her arm got sucked into the vacuum.  She was able to get her arm out and was fine, but right before it happened anyone watching could tell she wasn’t being careful and was going to get her arm sucked into the vacuum.  Later she said that she is absent minded and not very safety conscious.  In other words, she an a direct encounter with reality that slapped her in the face.  The gold mining boat she is on is just her and the captain/owner of the boat.  The captain even said that her contribution to his gold mining operation was pretty minimal.

Beyond the token chick, there were some very interesting metaphors in this show.  The captain/owner of the boat that the token chick works on seems like a he could be a MGHOW.  At one point he talked about how he doesn’t have a girlfriend (the token chick isn’t his girlfriend and there is nothing going on between them at all), and how gold is really his girlfriend right now.  He also does things like live in a Mongolian yurt on the beach, etc.  Given the size of his boat and mining operation, he is also the one making the most money so far.  (There is a boat that is making more money than him, but it’s much bigger and has more overhead so this guy is coming out ahead so far.)  Of course the token chick is working for the possible MGHOW.  He has the gold (literally) while everyone else is tapped out.

On one of the other boats, the captain of that boat owes a lot in child support payments.  He has talked about how if he doesn’t get some money to pay child support, he’s going to jail.  In other words, he is practically mining gold to hand over to his ex-wife and her increasing demands.  That’s a real good metaphor for the feminist anti-family court system.

Even in Nome, Alaska, you can’t get away from feminism.

 

Sluts over time increase their slutiness.  Eventually there gets to a point where a slut has reached maximum slutiness.  Or is there?  Is that point just an inflection point to a new frontier of slutiness?  I think the answer is that there is a new frontier of slutiness coming, and that frontier is being filthy.  I don’t being filthy in a good way as in sexual filthiness.  I mean literal filthiness as in sluts who don’t regularly wash themselves.

I came to this conclusion last night when I was watching Jersey Shore on MTV.  I was watching both last week’s episode (which I didn’t get a chance to watch last week) and this week’s episode.  Last week’s episode featured Snooki being very filthy.  (Beyond everything else I’m going to talk about, this episode is very entertaining because it has Deena and Sammi trying to figure out electricity unsuccessfully, and the Situation having his fly unzipped and dick sticking out for a long time without him realizing it.)  It starts out with Snooki pissing on in her pants in a club.  Does Snooki go home and and take a shower?  Of course not.  She takes what she calls a “shore shower” and just sprays herself with a lot of perfume.  Snooki doesn’t even remove her piss soaked panties until the next morning.

It turns out that Snooki has a urinary tract infection.  She says it’s because of all the sex she’s having, yet most people have sex without ever having a UTI.  Clearly, it has to do with her lack of hygiene.

Later in the episode she has to piss, but all the bathrooms in the house are occupied.  So what does Snooki do?  She pisses outside, and those of us who watched the episode get to see her piss outside.  One of the other roommates says, “She drinks out of bowls and pisses outside.  We don’t need pets.”

If you read any message board about Jersey Shore like board at Television Without Pity, one thing that comes up from time to time is the lack of hygiene of the Jersey Shore cast.  This isn’t atypical for them.

I’m convinced being filthy is the next frontier of slutiness.  Increasing slutiness is basically increasing bad behavior by women that they expect men to accept.  A failure to adhere to standards of basic hygiene would be consistent with this.

In the future, this is going to be something I’m going to have to watch with my women.  I naturally assumed that any woman I get now or in the future would know how to wash themselves since they are presumably functioning adults.  This is no longer an assumption I can make.  As soon as this starts being a problem, I’m heading back to being celibate.  I’m not a cleanliness freak by a long shot, but this is seriously disgusting, and I don’t want to know what organisms are growing on these filthy sluts.  I knew there would get to a point where I would be heading back to celibacy, but I didn’t think it would have to do with women having a lack of hygiene.

This will add another reason for guys to use alternatives to women such as porn now and VR sex in the future.  All of those “virtual women” know how to wash themselves.  If things are going the way of women getting increasingly filthy, then it’s another reason that virtual women will be superior to real women.

 

The reason why there is so much written in the manosphere about socons, conservatives, etc. is because it is recognized that feminism is not purely a left wing ideology.  It has infected both the left AND the right, and TDOM explains this and how feminism transcends both the left and the right:

That’s an interesting way of framing the discussion. I’ve often viewed feminism as neither left nor right by nature. Instead it is as many feminists freely admit, a gender issue and there are members of both genders on either side of the political spectrum.

I think early feminists adopted the leftist view as a matter of strategy and for recruitment purposes. The Marxist approach to economics was easily adaptable to cultural practices. All it took to draw in membership was to convince people that women are disadvantaged. With societal structures predominantly populated with men, this was easy enough to do. The term “patriarchy” was redefined and used for this purpose. first wave feminists laid the groundwork and second wave feminists became the footsoldiers.

Aligning themselves with cultural Marxist idealism served another purpose as well. The communist witch hunts of the McCarthy era resulted in a popularization of Marxism during which time, it became chic to be openly Marxist and difficult, if not destructive, for opponents of Marxism to speak out against them. the fear of being identified as a “hatemonger” keeping opponents in line.

At first, feminism was only a part of the liberal movement of the 60s but by the mid-80s it had eclipsed the movement itself and liberalism had become more or less synonymous with feminism to the point that one could not be leftist and not be feminist.

On the right, the movement was more subtle. Women were already being pedastalized by white knight chivalry as standard practice. The leftist acceptance of the women as victim model was simmply transferred to the right. One did not have to adopt the value system to accept the model. In fact, on the right women were already seen as helpless. all that was needed was to turn “helpless” into “victim.”

The second wave feminist could fight the battles and the conservative feminist would move out of the way and then reap the rewards.

The chivalrist ideal was prevalent on the left as well. For more liberal chivalrists it was easy to accept feminists because of their Marxist position. They simply incorporated feminism into their own leftist idealism and became collaborationists (manginas as they are sometimes called). The right wing chivalrist (the white knight) picked up on the woman as victim mantra and rushed to her rescue.

Feminism transcends left and right. It is neither and it is both. It favors wealth and cultural redistribution from male to female while seeking to establish a totalitarian police state to control the “oppressor class.” To that end it has abandoned the liberal ideal of personal freedom and liberty for all, in favor of personal freedom and liberty for the new feminist oppressor class while restricting liberty and freedom for the new oppressed class (male). It seeks to replace what it calls patriarchy with matriarchy (which can now be equated with female supremacism). thus while claiming to hold the liberal ideal of “equality” feminism has in reality adopted the conservative ideal of a ruling class superior to that of the working class and with more rights and privilege and the full force of the state to enforce that privilege.

 

I found a link to this post from a comment at Dalrock’s blog about some “Christian” woman who is decrying the manosphere as a haven of sexual sin.  There are so many things wrong with this post that I don’t know where to start.  If you read the post, she sounds like a feminist.  She talks about how “angry” the manosphere is (which we know is code orange shaming language).  Since she doesn’t seem to be any different than a feminist, what’s her reason for claiming to not be a feminist?  It is:

I cannot offer an apology for feminism. I have not been able to align myself with the women’s movement because my sexual ethics, which are informed by my Catholic faith, are incompatible with the feminist stance on birth control, extra-marital sex, and abortion.

That’s it.  So what about the other 99.999% of feminism?  Clearly, she agrees with that.  When it comes to things like birth control and sex outside of marriage, there is nothing really “feminist” about it.  There are plenty of pro-life feminists so abortion isn’t particularly feminist either.  This woman’s three examples of how “she’s not a feminist” have a very limited and tenuous connection to feminism at best.  She has nothing to say about things really caused by feminism like paternity fraud, men who are forced into corrupt divorce courts and have their children stolen from them, the false rape industry, the false sexual abuse industry, the false sexual harassment industry, affirmative action, etc.

This woman is just another AFINO (anti-feminist in name only) and an example of conservative female supremacism.

 

Last month the winner of the December 2011 Entitlement Princess of the Month was Sinead O’Connor for her very short marriage and rest of her behavior.  Remember to keep submitting entitlement princesses on the Entitlement Princess of the Month submission page.

This month we have three entitlement princesses to choose from.  The first was submitted by Carbon 14, and she is Angel Adams, a single mother with 15 kids demanding that “someone [not her] has to pay for them”.  Watch this video which documents her entitlement princessness:

The second entitlement princess was submitted by Anonymous, and she is Hibo Maxamed, a Muslim woman of Somali ancestry living in the UK, who along with her sisters and a cousin attacked a woman for being white.  Maxamed and her sisters and cousin while in court demanded (and ultimately received) a lighter sentence on the grounds that they were drunk and not used to alcohol being Muslim women and that the victim’s boyfriend (who was with the victim when she was attacked) tried to defend her.  After the trial, Hibo Maxamed was asked if she wanted to apologize and her response was, “What, to the public?  I really don’t care.”

The third entitlement princess was submitted by Anonymous, and she is Christina Almanza, a 17-year-old girl who lied to her parents claiming she was kidnapped and being sold into sex slavery in order to cover up her second pregnancy.  She said that she didn’t expect law enforcement to get involved and was just looking for sympathy from her parents.

Vote for one of the entitlement princesses in the poll below.  Remember you are voting for the biggest entitlement princess, not necessarily the most evil woman or the most insane woman.

What is your vote for the January 2012 Entitlement Princess Of The Month?

  • Angel Adams (56%, 40 Votes)
  • Hibo Maxamed (24%, 17 Votes)
  • Christina Almanza (20%, 14 Votes)

Total Voters: 71

Loading ... Loading ...
 

I found this comment:

rumor has it Elam is the actual man behind the anti-game nonsense

Rumor has it?  Yes, Paul Elam disagrees with game.  Deal with it.  He has better things to do than secretly organize a campaign against game.  It’s things like this that make me embarrassed to be associated with the game community.

 

I added a new page called On Sluts, where I talk about some aspects of sluts you probably haven’t considered.  I’m disabling comments on this post because all of the content is on the new page.  Follow the link or click on the tab at the top of the blog to read the page and comment on it.

 

I have been following Dalrock’s posts about the Costa Concordia disaster.  From there, I found a link to this where a socon/tradcon/conservative female supremacist name Sheila Gregoire was wailing about how men weren’t committing a female supremacist form of seppuku for the benefit of women.  What I mean by a “female supremacist form of seppuku for the benefit of women” is the idea of “women and children first” where men should die for the benefit of women.  It’s similar to seppuku because seppuku was a way for samurai to die “with honor” and because female supremacists like Sheila Gregoire think it’s dishonorable for men to save themselves from a sinking ship.  To her and other female supremacists, this is “dishonorable” so the only way for men to save their honor in their eyes is to willingly die on the ship which is ritualistically committing suicide for women.

If that doesn’t convince you that “women and children first” is feminist/female supremacist, then the next sentence will.  Women and Children First is the name of a feminist bookstore in Chicago.  If “women and children first” wasn’t a feminist idea, then it wouldn’t be the name of a feminist bookstore.  (There aren’t any feminist bookstores named, “Men Are Really Great” after all.)  The only more feminist name for a bookstore would be, “Women and Women First” which is the name of the feminist bookstore in Portlandia.

 

As all of you can tell, I have been pretty absent from the blog.  Real life interferes with my blogging.  That’s why the December 2011 Entitlement Princess of the Month didn’t get done until now.

Last month’s Entitlement Princess of the Month was Kim Kardashian for 72 day marriage to Kris Humphries.  She won by default due to a lack of submissions at the time, and that she deserves a lifetime achievement award for entitlement princessry.

Since this month’s Entitlement Princess award got delayed, all of the submissions will be held for next month except for Twell’s submission of Sinead O’Connor.  (Remember to continue to submit entitlement princesses at this link.)    I’m selected Sinead O’Connor for December’s entitlement princess of the month.  Not only did Sinead O’Connor have a 16 day marriage, she also deserves an entitlement princess lifetime achievement award.

One of the reasons that O’Connor’s marriage only lasted 16 days was that her now ex-husband was pissed that she went looking for drugs right after the wedding.  O’Connor literally chose drugs over her husband.  On top of that this is O’Connor’s fourth marriage despite her vow she made after her second marriage fell apart to never get married again.

Sinead O’Connor has a long history of being an entitlement princess.  In 1991 she boycotted the Grammy Awards where she would have received several awards for its “extreme commercialism.  In 1992 she ripped up a picture of then Pope John Paul II at the end of a performance during Saturday Night Live.  (She intentionally deceived NBC and the crew of Saturday Night Live about her plans to rip up a picture of the Pope by doing something different during rehearsals.)  In 1990 O’Connor whined about playing at a venue that had a tradition of playing the national anthem before performances and made them remove the national anthem before her performance.  In 2000 she came out as a lesbian, but then retracted that shortly afterwards.  She claimed this wasn’t a publicity stunt.

All of this adds up to Sinead O’Connor being the December 2011 Entitlement Princess of the Month.  She is also deserving of an entitlement princess lifetime achievement award.

 

Carbon 14 emailed me a few days ago and asked me why I hadn’t commented on something on Susan Walsh’s blog from several months ago that referenced me.  I haven’t read her blog for a long time except for cases like last month’s debacle where her real attitudes got revealed.  That is the reason why.  Regardless I wish I had known about this sooner because it’s another example showing just how nuts Susan Walsh has become.  (In all of the following blockquotes, I’m also including screenshots of the comments being quoted in case Susan Walsh goes on a deleting spree when this gets posted.)

Several months ago someone using the name of David Jones wrote this comment on HookingUpSmart:  (Screenshot here)

@runningman

I owe you an apology. I thought you were one of the over 30 male virgins. The so called “mens rights” movement is filled with agents of the elite promoting gender war for the purposes of depopulation. I have it on good authority that over 30 virgin males are the primary group recruited by the elite for that purpose.

Clearly, you are not a part of that, and I see that now. I misinterpreted your email, and I’m sorry.

@Susan

With more info about runningman, I see that he’s nothing like Mr. White & Nerdy. I owed him an apology, and I made that apology.

With that said, the so called “mens rights” movement was manufactured by the elite just as feminism was. Gloria Steinem worked for the CIA, and there are agents of the elite in the mens rights movement too. Both sides of the gender war are funded by the elite just as the funded both sides of various wars in history. Virgin males over 30 make excellent recruiting targets for the elite especially the angrier ones. Mr. White & Nerdy is a good example, but he is not the only one. It’s a safe bet Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Tech also works for the elite because he is deeply embedded in the military-industrial-security state complex. He was an over 30 virgin. Supposedly he isn’t anymore, but it doesn’t matter if he is or isn’t a virgin now.

There are others working for the elite that aren’t virgins over 30. It’s clear that The Fifth Horseman works for the elite. The elite is now obsessed with transhumanism, and The Fifth Horseman promotes a “mens rights transhumanism” which is technological gender war.

I suspect others in the mens rights movement of working for the elite but these are the only three I am certain about.

If you can’t get laid, the Illuminati want to recruit you to rule the world.  It makes more sense than a lot of things I have heard in conspiracy theory.

By itself, none of this is particularly notable now.  We have heard the bit about how I work for the Illuminati and that the MRM is some sort of Illuminati program many times before.  We have even heard variations on the “virgin/sexless recruitment” idea before.  Many conspiracy theorists are afraid of transhumanism so that isn’t new either.

Knowing all that, why am I writing a post on this?  Why is someone writing a crazy comment on Susan Walsh’s blog relevant to Susan Walsh?  Many of you are asking that because you automatically assume that Susan Walsh had a normal reaction to such lunacy and regarded it as garbage.  It seems like a reasonable assumption but you are wrong:  (Screenshot here)

@David Jones
That’s a pretty compelling story you’re telling there. W&N and PMAFT have both been very difficult in these comment threads. TFH has also been here, but has never been anything but perfectly civil (though humorless).

Yes, Susan Walsh called a crazy story about the “elite” recruiting sexless men, COMPELLING.  If Susan Walsh chooses to address this, I’m sure she will pull the same tricks she did last month when she said that divorce is overblown in the manosphere.  The fact is that she has no excuse.  If you read the entire page of comments, multiple people recognize David Jones comments as lunacy.  Susan Walsh has no excuse not to recognize this for what it is.  So why did Susan Walsh call a conspiracy theory about me, compelling?  Susan Walsh is in the business of whitewashing sluts or slut rehab.  The problem with “slut rehab” is that more and more men are realizing the truth about pervasive misandry and how that applies to sluts.  The idea of the “former slut” will not gain traction with increasing numbers of men.  If growing numbers of men are taking the position of “once a slut, always a slut”, then what are you left with if you want to rehab sluts?  Besides man up 2.0, the only thing left is to claim that women were “brainwashed” into being sluts.  In other words, being a slut wasn’t their choice but sort of forced upon them so any man refusing to have anything to do with supposedly “former” sluts is just beating up on the “victims” of brainwashing.  The only way to do that is with an absurd conspiracy theory like the one David Jones gave her.

If Susan Walsh thinks all of this is compelling, she probably thinks I’m a reptile alien too.

Lastly, I’m going to include part of David Jones last comment:  (Screenshot here)

The so called “mens rights” movement come into this because it’s the “mirror image of feminism” for men. It’s the male side of the elite’s manufactured gender war. If there’s one thing the “mens rights” males agree on its not getting married. That means less children. Within “mens rights” the MGTOW movement is even more extreme. They promote ghosting for men which involves avoiding women entirely. The more MGTOWs, the less children.

As Gloria Steinem and others worked for the elite in feminism, there are agents of the elite in the “mens rights” movement. Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Tech is deeply embedded in the military-industrial-security state complex. He has admitted this on his blog. That sounds like how Gloria Steinem worked for the CIA. He is acting under orders from his elite masters to grow the “mens rights” movement and promote gender war.

If you want to promote gender war from the male side, who would be the best group to recruit? Angry male virgins who can’t get together with women. Those males are already predisposed to work for the elite’s manufactured gender war. This is where overgrown boys like White & Nerdy come in. (Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Tech may have also been recruited this way. Being in the military-industrial-security state complex he probably knows more of the elite’s plans.) I know of other examples of this. A friend of mine has a brother similar to White & Nerdy. A year ago my friend’s brother started acting and talking like a “mens rights” hard liner that would be at home at the spearhead. My friend’s brother also suddenly got a lot more money at around the same time, and my friend can’t explain how that happened.

The elite are also very interested in transhumanism so that’s how I know The Fifth Horseman is involved. He might not be difficult here but each of the agents has a different job so his doesn’t involve being as hard line as White & Nerdy and Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Tech.

The reason why White & Nerdy and Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Tech have been so hard line is because a blog like yours, Susan, that promotes good relationships between men and women is a threat to the elite’s plans. The “mens rights” movement is still small so your blog can have a real effect, Susan.

Notice I did not talk about lizard people, Illuminati, Freemasons, Bohemian Grove, the occult despite the jokes of a few people here. Such things are distractions to what is really going on. Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Tech makes jokes like that all the time to distract from what he is really doing. Such fantasy is not a part of anything that I said.

Yes, I make jokes about reptile aliens and other things.  When it comes to someone like David Jones, I’m doing him a favor.  Conspiracy theories involving reptile aliens and demonic powers are less crazy than a conspiracy theory that male virgins are getting recruited by the elite.

Update: AmStrat wanted to remind everyone about the research that shows that conspiracy theorists are more willing than the general population to join a conspiracy.  This means that Susan Walsh accusing me of being part of a conspiracy says a lot more about her and her morality than it does about me.

 

Over the holidays I took time off to visit family.  At one point I had nothing to do, and I wasn’t interested in reading the internet through my smartphone anymore so I looked for something to watch on TV.  This is something I don’t usually do as I usually have other things to do.  My TV watching is much more directed towards specific things.  I went through the cable’s On Demand service and found this show called Secretly Pregnant Sluts.  (The actual title is Secretly Pregnant, but Secretly Pregnant Sluts describes the show more accurately.)  It’s on the Discovery Fit & Health channel which is one of the 90% of channels on cable that I never watch because it’s entertainment for women 24/7.  I would assume that a channel called “Fit & Health” would promote fitness and health.  Secretly Pregnant Sluts did neither.

Here are a few of the sluts that were featured on this show:

  1. Bikini Model Slut.  Bikini model slut actually lives in the DC area.  She was keeping her pregnancy a secret because she’s worried that she will lose modeling jobs.  She didn’t even look like a bikini model.  They show her hanging out with her model friends one time and the difference between her and the rest of the models who look like models was striking.  She was a single mother too, but when she got pregnant, she married her boyfriend.  Her kids were from her first marriage, and bikini model slut admitted on camera that her first marriage was just so she could get having kids out of the way and was not for love.  It wasn’t said on camera, but I’m sure she also likes the chilimony check she’s getting.
  2. Ugly Obese Slut.  Ugly obese slut was married during part of the filming.  She was unemployed along with her husband and living with her mom.  She already had one kid she can’t provide for financially.  Eventually, she kicks her husband out.  Before that her husband says on camera says that he has been on job interviews and even gotten job offers, but the jobs “weren’t what he was looking for”.  (I guess he was waiting for a management position.)  Unemployment was a common problem among all the sluts and their husbands and boyfriends.
  3. Ugly Cougar Slut.  Ugly cougar slut was 40 years old and a single mother with a few kids.  She was at a bar and met a 19 year old guy.  They banged, but thought it would be a one night stand until they ended up pregnant.  They decided to try to have a “relationship”, but it was fraught with problems.  The 19 year old guy was unemployed and didn’t have a lot going on upstairs.  (I suspect a scan of his brain would find a large hole where a brain is supposed to be.)  Ugly cougar slut got her man a job at her office.  Eventually, this goes south, and he ends up in jail.  Eventually, ugly cougar slut’s office figures out that the guy she got a job there was her boyfriend so she ends up humiliated at her office due to everything that happened.
  4. College Slut.  There isn’t a lot to say about her that isn’t similar to the other sluts except that she gets knocked up at 19 by her boyfriend.   He is neither in college nor employed.
  5. Ugly Obese Repeat Slut.  Ugly obese repeat slut is also ugly and obese like ugly obese slut.  This slut already had been knocked up in college and was a single mother with one kid.  Now, she’s in her 20s and gets knocked up again.  Her boyfriend spent two years in jail.  She also has “employment difficulties”.
  6. Mistress Slut.  Mistress slut had an affair with a married man.  She gets knocked up by the married guy, but the married guy decides to stay with his wife.  She goes back to the married guy and gets knocked up by him AGAIN.  (Filming takes place during the pregnancy of her second kid.)  She lives in New York City and gets told by her family in Florida to move down to Florida because it’s cheaper.  While mistress slut has a job, NYC is expensive especially with two kids.  However, mistress slut doesn’t want to give up her pseudo sex and the city lifestyle.
  7. Raised By Her Daughter Slut.  This slut was 42 years old and got knocked up by her boyfriend.  She didn’t think she could get pregnant at her age so she wasn’t careful.  She was a single mom with two daughters.  Her oldest daughter who was 22 was obviously the adult in their relationship.  The younger, 17 year old, daughter went to live with the 22 year old because the slut couldn’t take care of her.  This slut spent most of her time worrying about what her 22 year old was going to think of her being pregnant.  The slut’s daughter realizes that the slut’s boyfriend is useless so that feeds into the slut’s freaking out.  She kept saying things like. “If my daughter wants me to give up the baby for adoption, I will do it.”  In terms of freaking out she was worse than all of the other sluts on this show.  She was also unemployed as was her boyfriend.  Her boyfriend didn’t see a problem with this state because he kept saying, “God will provide for us.”

There were other sluts featured in this show, but at this point they’re just like the sluts I listed.  Unemployment, financial, and legal (i.e. jail) problems were commonplace among either the sluts or their men.  Since I don’t want that much TV and ignore most of the channels on my FIOS system (as they are pure female entertainment 24/7), I didn’t realize how bad most of TV has become.  I knew it was bad, but not this bad.  This show is designed to tap straight into the female psyche and rationalization hamster.  The drama could be considered to be manufactured as the sluts are responsible for their situations.  The website for the show even has ideas for its female viewership to manufacture drama with pages like, “5 Reasons to Keep Your Pregnancy a Secret“, “Hiding the Baby Bump“, and “Is He Ready to Be a Dad?”  This show not only features female manufactured drama, but it also shows women new ways to manufacture drama in their own lives.

 

When juggling three women, eventually you will run into a situation where you have to pick one.  Usually, it’s not a problem, but when it comes to something like New Year’s Eve, which is tonight, each of my women want my exclusive presence.  Each of my women think they’re “the girlfriend” and the other two are chicks I occasionally bang.  I have to keep each of them thinking they’re “the girlfriend” since my purpose in picking up women at the Sunday Morning Nightclub is to prevent women from getting their hands on men who they will marry, use up, and divorce.  Thus, I ran into a situation where I had to pick one.

I picked Molly because she’s the newest.  I was looking for a reason to dump Sabrina and Kate.  All of you should remember I already tried that once, and they begged and begged and begged me to take them back which got me to take them back.  I think I have been with the two of them for too long as it is, Sabrina in particular.  Sabrina was sending some strong messages that she was thinking it close to time to get engaged.  Breaking up with Sabrina and Kate wasn’t fun at all.  I will spare you guys the details.  Needless to say they were very angry when they realized they weren’t (or were no longer) “the girlfriend”.  This time, I think my breaking up with them will stick because it was clear I picked another woman over them.

 

I’m really disappointed in the lack of Dilbert Award submissions.   The reason why we only have Dilbert Awards one a quarter instead of once of month is because of the lack of submissions.  Go out and find some successful men who were stupid enough to get involved with a single mother, and submit them here.

A famous Hollywood actor has no problem getting most any woman he wants.  Since he’s on TV and/or movie screens, he gets a lot of visibility so he does not lack in options when it comes to women.  A Hollywood actor has no reason to get together with a single mother, much less one significantly older than him.  Yet, that is what Ashton Kutcher, this quarter’s Dilbert Award winner, did when he married Demi Moore.  While it was absurd for Ashton Kutcher to get married to a woman 16 years older then him, he also got married to a single mother.  Demi Moore has three children from her marriage to Bruce Willis.  While Kutcher and Moore are currently separated and on their way to getting divorced, the fact is that Ashton Kutcher married a single mother 16 years older than him and spent 6 years married to her.  That makes him eligible for the Dilbert Award, and why I selected him for this quarter’s winner.

Normally there would be voting like with the Entitlement Princess of the Month, but due to the lack of submissions, Kutcher wins the 2011 Fourth Quarter Dilbert Award by default.

 

At least according to this (H/T: The MGTOW Forums):

By Curtis Powers, curtis.powers@iowastatedaily.com

When I look at the various social problems in America, there seems to be one common link: a lack of good men.

Men who will take responsibility for their actions and not fear commitment. Men who will get married, raise their children well, work hard at their job and for their community, and be a voice for the poor and oppressed.

Maybe that’s a sweeping generalization or an oversimplification of things, but hang with me on this. Let’s look at some major issues, for example the financial crisis and abortion. Then let’s examine more root-level issues like video games.

Let’s start with the financial crisis. From an article in The Atlantic, it appears porn may have helped start our financial collapse in 2008. Here are some noteworthy lines from the story:

“A senior attorney — a man — at the SEC’s Washington headquarters spent up to eight hours a day looking at and downloading pornography.”

“An accountant was blocked more than 16,000 times in a month from visiting websites classified as ‘sex’ or ‘pornography.’ Yet, he still managed to amass a collection of ‘very graphic’ material on his hard drive by using Google images.”

“The number of cases jumped from two in 2007 to 16 in 2008. The cracks in the financial system emerged in mid-2007 and spread into full-blown panic by the fall of 2008.”

That’s a pretty alarming report and speaks volumes. After all, what are you doing looking at porn, especially at work? Especially in that quantity. Also, where’s the accountability from other people within the agency? It’s surprising in this day and age that it would go unnoticed for so long.

How about abortion? Another article on The Catholic Education Resource Center’s website, stated, “Nearly 40 percent of post-abortive women in one study reported that partners pressured them into having the abortions.”

“Indeed, in her study of the data, Emory University professor Elizabeth Fox-Genovese reports that ‘the most enthusiastic fans of abortion have been men — at least until they have children of their own.’”

It is very sad to hear that some men would force women into having abortions. A woman shouldn’t have to face that kind of pressure when dealing with an unplanned pregnancy.

She should be able to count on the unquestioned support of her partner. However, in this day and age, most men don’t want to grow up and in this case, take responsibility for helping raise their own children.

This trend is called by some as “emerging adulthood.” More accurately for men, it could probably be called the Cartman Syndrome, which can be summarized with the following quote: “I’ll do what I want, whatever I want, for as long I want, and never grow up unless I have to.”

Therefore, as the City Journal points out, “Single Young Males, or SYMs, by contrast, often seem to hang out in a playground of drinking, hooking up, playing ‘Halo 3,’ and, in many cases, underachieving. With them, adulthood looks as though it’s receding.”

This is illustrated most poignantly with video games. Check out this stat from the same article which is appropriately entitled, “Child-Man in the Promised Land.”

“Those boys have grown up to become child-man gamers, turning a niche industry into a $12 billion powerhouse. Men between the ages of 18 and 34 are now the biggest gamers; according to Nielsen Media, almost half — 48.2 percent — of American males in that age bracket had used a console during the last quarter of 2006, and did so, on average, two hours and 43 minutes per day. (That’s 13 minutes longer than 12 to 17-year-olds, who evidently have more responsibilities than today’s twentysomethings.)”

That is simply shocking, appalling even. Expand that out over a week and it’s roughly 19 hours. That’s a part-time job!

Women, on the other hand, seem to be doing just the opposite. Right before that line describing young, single men, it states, “But while we grapple with the name, it’s time to state what is now obvious to legions of frustrated young women: the limbo doesn’t bring out the best in young men.”

“With women, you could argue that adulthood is in fact emergent. Single women in their twenties and early thirties are joining an international New Girl Order, hyperachieving in both school and an increasingly female-friendly workplace, while packing leisure hours with shopping, traveling, and dining with friends.”

No wonder women make up 60 percent of college graduates today.

Anyway, it’s been hard for me to pinpoint an underlying problem. Though like the previous article I wrote about “Amusing ourselves to death,” it seems to be more a problem of men loving what will ruin us.

However, there seems to be one thing that can help us — men — think about how we’re doing. Ask yourself this question: When I die, what will my obituary say? More importantly, what will your family say about you?

Will it say, “Here lies [your name]. He wasted his life on sports, movies, video games and porn. He died alone in a nursing home.”

Or will it say, “Here lies [your name]. He worked hard at his job, for his community, and stood up for the poor and the oppressed. He leaves behind his wife, lots of children,and lots of grandchildren who dearly loved him and will do things even greater than he.”

I hope that one day I will be able to look back upon my life when I am old and know that I have left a legacy for future generations. I hope that you men can, too.

There are so many things wrong with this that I don’t know where to begin.  It just speaks for itself.

 

I have been busy, so I haven’t commented much on the latest Susan Walsh debacle at Dalrock’s where she says that divorce only happens because men cheat on their wives.  Everyone is saying what needs to be said, so I am not concerned about contributing.  If you want to find out what Susan Walsh is really all about then that post and all of the comments will provide you with an excellent education on the subject.  She really digs a hole for herself and shows her true colors.

I’m glad to see that more and more people are finally figuring out everything I have known about Susan Walsh for close to two years.  I knew eventually she would say something that would demonstrate her game 2.0/man up 2.0 attitudes.  If you want to know something before other people do, you should be reading this blog.

It’s clear to me that Susan Walsh is on the same path as Obsidian, who over time crashed and burned as the truth about him came out.  (I also figured out Obsidian long before most anyone else.)  Susan Walsh is really Obsidian 2.0.

 

Today is December 21st 2011.  One year from today is when lots of people are saying the world will end or mostly end because of some nonsense about the Mayan calendar.  It’s all nonsense.  One year from today, nothing will happen except maybe some morons going nuts.

The “Mayan calendar” only ends on 12/21/12 in the same way a 2011 calendar ends on 12/31/11.   The world isn’t going to end on 12/31/11, and it’s not going to end on 12/21/12 either.  The “Mayan calendar” that ends in 2012 is known as the long count calendar.  The Mayans actually had several long count calendars, some of which have already “ended”.  If you think Mayan calendars mean anything when it comes to the end of the world, then since some of the long count calendars have ended already means the world has already ended several times over.  Everything is a figment of your imagination.

Penn & Teller when they had their Bullshit! show did an episode on 2012.  They talk to various scientists plus experts in Mayan culture and history including an actual Mayan princess.  All of them say that the world isn’t going to end on 2012, especially the Mayan princess.  (The video of that episode is below, but parts of it are NSFW):

Neil deGrasse Tyson, author and director of the Hayden Planetarium, has also been active explaining 2012:

NASA put out this video explaining some of the facts about 2012:

A year from today I am going to write another post title, “We’re Still Here” because we will all be still here.  End of story.

 

My latest post for The Spearhead is up. As with all Spearhead posts comments are disabled so comment on the post at The Spearhead.

When someone is talking about mens’ rights issues or anything that only affects or disproportionately affects men, a common response is some derivative of “women have it just as bad.”  This response will be used no matter how absurd it is when applied to the issue or issues being discussed.  For example, if an MRA is discussing what happens to men during and after divorce, someone will respond that women suffer just as much from divorce. Obviously, this is not the case, because women wouldn’t disproportionately initiate divorce proceedings otherwise. What these people are doing is promoting a myth of equal suffering.

Why do we have a myth of equal suffering?  It is because feminists – and even many anti-feminists (who are really anti-feminist in name only, or AFINOs) – don’t want to admit that there are certain issues (such as divorce) where men bear the overwhelming brunt of the negative impact. Feminists will use this myth in an attempt to shut down any effort to show that their policies and actions are attacking men. AFINOs will also use the myth to hide the fact that women who don’t claim to be feminists are still benefiting from feminism.  For them, it’s an attempt to pretend that the benefits of feminism are going to some far away group of feminist women instead of both feminist women and AFINO women. This can be seen with divorce where women who don’t claim to be feminists divorce as often as self-admitted feminist women do. It can also be seen when someone says, “But feminism hurts women too”.

The myth of equal suffering is not used in the opposite direction. If something were to disproportionately affect women, these people will not talk about how men are suffering just as much from the same problem. This is because the true purpose of the myth of equal suffering is not to demonstrate that men and women suffer equally: it is to diminish problems experienced by men so that women can be shown to be suffering more. This serves the purpose of adding more power to women via victimhood. It is similar to how feminism in general claims to support equality when in reality it is promoting an agenda of female supremacism.

 

My latest post for The Spearhead is up. As with all Spearhead posts comments are disabled so comment on the post at The Spearhead.

In this part of the internet there are many traditionalists and others who attack the idea of going ghost and try to promote marriage.  They will repeatedly say that they are “defending marriage”.  For those of us who know the score about marriage 2.0 and how marriage 1.0 is already dead in Western countries, these “defenders of marriage” are either intentionally or unintentionally pushing men into the feminist institution of marriage 2.0.  Many of these “defenders of marriage” will claim that they are just trying to protect ”traditional marriage” (i.e. marriage 1.0) from those who are trying to “destroy marriage” (which typically means MRAs to them, even though MRAs aren’t trying to “destroy marriage,” but warn men of the dangers of marriage 2.0).  How do we know whether these “defenders of marriage” are legitimate in their defense of marriage, or are just trying to force men to submit to a conservative/traditional form of feminism?  The answer is the expat test.

In these arguments for and against marriage, the debate is presented as getting married vs. not getting married.  This is an inaccurate way to frame how men are dealing with the current situation regarding marriage.  There are more than just those two answers — there are actually three options:

  1. Get married in a marriage 2.0 (feminist) country
  2. Get married in a marriage 1.0 country (which by definition involves expating, because bringing a woman to a marriage 2.0 country ends up being option 1)
  3. Don’t get married whether you expat or not

Anyone who claims to defend “traditional marriage” should love option 2.  They should love the idea of a man making sure that he gets a traditional marriage by expating to a marriage 1.0 county.  It shouldn’t matter to them where a traditional marriage happens as long as it happens.  This objectively does more to preserve “traditional marriage” – by any definition that the “defenders of marriage” would use – than getting married in a marriage 2.0 country, which does nothing to preserve traditional marriage.

If you confront “defenders of marriage” with the expat test, what will their response be?  Typically, they will be against the idea of a man expating to another country to enjoy a traditional marriage.  They will come up with all sorts of nonsense to argue against expating to contract a marriage 1.0 arrangement. The arguments range from culture to, in extreme cases, white nationalism/racial obligations.  In other words, in nearly all cases, a “defender of marriage” will fail the expat test, proving that their real goal has nothing to do with “traditional marriage;” instead, it is about placating the women in their churches and producing more babies.  Their push for marriage is really about white knighting for women and/or their fear that their group or race is not having enough babies.

If you’re reading this, it’s likely none of this is is new to you. However, the expat test still has value because it can be used as a tool to prove objectively that nearly all “defenders of marriage” aren’t actually defending marriage, but have other goals, none of which take men’s interests into consideration.

 

Anonymous Reader gave an explanation of the three possible ways that misandry could unwind in the future:

Regarding the unwind of misandry TFH prefers one form of unwind to another.

Zed
Someone is dumping raw sewage into the lake where I get my drinking water. There is no “sacrifice” at all in trying to stop them. I am part of “the common”, and the common good is also my good. I like drinking fresh, pure, water. Doesn’t everyone?

Sure. Consider three options:

Door # 1. You take the offender to court, a jury finds the other party is guilty of a tort, orders them to stop doing that bad thing and to pay damages to you, with the threat of imprisonment for repeat offenses or failure to pay.

Door #2. You get some friends together, go find the offender, take him out and beat the snot out of him, then throw him in the effluent runoff with a warning to “stop this, now, or you’ll get more of the same”.

Door #3. You get a lot of friends together, with weapons and torches. You find the offender, beat him as badly as you want to, then hang him by the neck from the nearest tree until he is dead, and leave his body hanging as a warning to others. You burn his house to the ground. You hunt down all his relatives and kill them as well; men, women, children, babies, old grannies, all of them. You burn all their houses, barns, cars, everything to ashes. If anyone gets in the way, you kill them, too. If anyone tries to defend any of the offenders relations, you kill them and burn their house as well.

Three solutions. Each one will end the problem of raw sewage in your drinking water. However, not all of them are going to lead to the same sort of society, right? I think that this is more or less what TFH is trying to suggest – orderly unwind, vs. disorderly unwind, vs. catastrophic unwind, there is a difference.

Historically, humans have employed all three of the methods above. The more desperate and frustrated and angry that people become about a problem, the more the solution tends away from Door #1, and towards Door #3. I am pretty sure that none of us want to live in the world that Door #3 leads to.

 

I found this comment on Alucin’s blog (that wasn’t from Alcuin himself):

Please, would you and the others in the manosphere quit using the Jew analogy! The whole holocaust fairytale is complete bullshit. I believed it for most of my life, just like you, how couldn’t we? It is all we are taught, or better said, it is all we are told, thousands upon thousands of times, everyday, everywhere we turn, pretty much from the age we learn to speak. But you’re obviously a bright guy that thinks for himself, so look into. We have the net now, you can educate yourself on so many things, like I am sure you did about the feminist lie. There is a ton of information out there. The Holohaux scam is falling apart, and fast, just like so many of the other scams. Get on the wave so as not to lose credibility. You’re a good writer.

And no, I am not a Neo-Nazi, or a “Jew-hater”, or any of the like…..just someone with a passion for the truth……..

I say keep using Jew analogies.  Not only did the holocaust happen, but what happened to the Jews is an apt metaphor for is happening to men.  I also like how it pisses off white nationalists.

 

I have been watching this TV series on the Starz channel called Boss.  It’s about a corrupt mayor of Chicago (yes, that’s redundant) that’s on his way down played by Kelsey Grammer.  One of the things Boss features (especially since Starz is a premium cable channel and can feature female nudity) is the male politicians banging chicks other than their wives.  What’s really interesting is the reactions of the politicians’ wives.  The mayor bangs other women.  This comes up in a conversation with his wife due to a neurological disease he has because his neurologist is female.  (The mayor doesn’t bang the neurologist.)  The mayor didn’t want tell his wife about the illness, but the mayor’s wife found out he’s been going to see this female doctor.  When the mayor’s wife confronts the mayor about this, the mayor says (to hide his illness), “Since when do you care where I stick it?”  She doesn’t really care if the mayor fucks other women.

There’s another example that’s even better.  Another politician is running for governor of Illinois under the direction of the mayor.  He gets convinced to instead run against the mayor later by a group that is trying to take down the mayor.  Eventually, the mayor finds out about this and to get that politician to start doing his bidding again, the mayor sends some photos of the gubernatorial candidate banging another chick to his wife.  When the candidate’s wife saw the photos, she was angry but not because her husband was banging other women.  She didn’t care about that.  She was angry because he got caught, and it nearly derailed her political plans.

These examples are fiction, but it reflects how my women don’t seem to care about me banging other chicks that much.  There might be some token resistance initially, but in the end they don’t really care, or they accept it.  Despite some claims to the contrary, I’m not a politician so this reflects a much larger reality beyond the political sphere.  There’s also an interesting warning about this sort of thing.  The gubernatorial candidate is pretty much under his wife’s thumb.  She just doesn’t care about controlling who he has sex with.  It’s something to think about, but it probably can only happen if you get married.

© 2009 - 2011 Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Technology Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha