I found this picture of sexist bread on the internet. It’s not fake. It really exists. Compare Foods is a real grocery store. Bimbo Bread is a real bread baker.
This should be the official bread of the MRM.
Pro-male/Anti-feminist Tech
Sep 042010
Sep 012010
I have a feeling that my relationship with Sabrina might be counting down to its end. I’m going to meet her parents. After that Sabrina is going to wonder (or wonder more than she already is) why she hasn’t met my parents yet. I can’t help but think things will fall apart from there. Of course, I would have to end our relationship before the holidays of Christmas, New Years, and Valentine’s Day to avoid accidental betaization.
I’m going to be gone for the next few days. Sabrina and I are going to Staten Island, NY where she is originally from. After watching Jersey Shore, I have to see this place since it’s where several of the cast members are from. We should also be making a stop at the actual Jersey shore on the way there. I’m sure I will stand out since I will be the guy wearing the hazmat suit.
I’m curious to see what this is like since I have never done this before. Since I will be gone for several days, I have a post scheduled for when I’m gone so all of you don’t feel abandoned.
Aug 282010
Let’s review what code purple shaming language is:
Charge of Rationalization (Code Purple) – The Sour Grapes Charge
Discussion: The target is accused of explaining away his own failures and/or dissatisfaction by blaming women for his problems. Example:
- “You are just bitter because you can’t get laid.”
Response: In this case, it must be asked if it really matters how one arrives at the truth. In other words, one may submit to the accuser, “What if the grapes really are sour?” At any rate, the Code Purple shaming tactic is an example of what is called “circumstantial ad hominem.”
Why was this added to the Catalog of Anti-Male Shaming Language? Because a man’s worth isn’t based on how many women he has fucked. We should understand this better than most but too often there is too much judging of a man based on his sex life or lack thereof.
Rob (of No Ma’am) had some good things to say about this:
Meh, uncontrollable sex drive only occurs for about 1/3 of human life (or less). One thing that happens with the “game crowd” is they are placing more value on getting laid than what it is worth. 2/3 of your life will still be spent in a state where pussy is not your number one goal or thought. What happens too often with game/sex is that it is like being popular in school. It seems really important at the time to wear the right type of jeans, but in the end, it doesn’t really matter too much – certainly not as much as what you once thought it did.
I would certainly like to see the “Game” crowd stop behaving like women and calling MRA’s bitter little whiners.
I’ll tell you this, many in the MRM crowd have bedded enormously more amounts of women than the average commenter over at Roissy’s – and many of them don’t consider themselves to be PUA masters – however, I am simply amazed at how “few” women so many “gamers” think is successful.
At any rate, both Gamers and the MRM could do eachother a benefit by dropping this petty little schoolyard fight of mocking… but I have to say, gamers seem to be the ones that don’t want to drop it, as 75% of gamers (falsely) consider themselves as alphas, and criticize everyone else as a loser beta. (It’s a zero sum game, so for every new alpha created, another alpha drops down to beta – unless you are both going to cram your cocks into the same pussy at the same time – the top 20% is always going to be the top 20%, just like the top 20% of hockey players are still the top 20%, even though they are 100 times more skilled than hockey players from 100-years ago). Also, alpha and beta are not constant states, but rather ebb and flow throughout a man’s life – and much of this ebb and flow also comes from a realization, often through swallowing bitter pills, of what the MRM often speaks about.
Let’s face it. Most of the gamers who go after the MRM and MRAs aren’t that great at getting women. They’re not in a position to talk about MRAs being losers. Talk especially on the internet is very easy. To see just how easy take a look at the Jersey Shore as a example. Go to 7:05 of this video of one of the Jersey Shore after shows. They talk about how Pauly and Mike (“The Situation”) claim to be these great players but they’re really just “scraping the filth off the boardwalk”. ”The Situation” even once called a large number of women in an hour and none of these women wanted anything to do with him. Granted, these guys haven’t called MRAs losers but if they did it would be nothing but a joke like the gamers who do that now. You’re not that great.
The “not getting laid” argument is just like the “not getting married” argument that gets used against MRAs and is used in pretty much the same way. We all know the dangers of marriage and why it should be avoided. This has not stopped conservative female supremacists from attacking us for being “immature”, “boys who shave”, or “refusing to do what God wants” or telling us that we need to “man up”. Agreeing with the CFS shaming language on marriage just gives women, manginas, and white knights power over men. (That’s why such shaming language exists, to control you.) It’s no different when undue importance gets placed on getting laid.
We all know the reasons why getting married is dangerous. It wasn’t always this way. It is possible with increased feminist control of government that sex with women could get more dangerous in the future just like marriage did. Hopefully, the misandry bubble will burst so that doesn’t happen but it could. Attacking MRAs for (supposedly) not getting laid is not going to protect you. If things get bad enough I am prepared to stop fucking women. Are you? If you aren’t then you are letting women, manginas, and white knights have power over you. I’m not suggesting anyone (least of all me) should stop fucking women right now. We aren’t there yet but game will not save you if things get this bad. As Rob pointed out marriage 2.0 nullifies a great part of game and if government ends up making fucking women as dangerous as marriage game will have the same problem there as well.
Knowing all this, why does it matter to you if another man is getting laid or not? If a man who isn’t getting laid says 2 + 2 = 4, that doesn’t make it wrong. Personally, I have a lot more respect for a man who isn’t getting laid and knows the truth than a man who is getting laid and letting himself get pushed around by women, manginas, and white knights for the “privilege”.
A couple of posts ago the question of whether there is really a church that isn’t feminized came up. Despite some protests to the contrary the Catholic church is feminized which is why I don’t attend mass anymore. A long time ago I looked at the protestants and they had many of the same problems and a few new ones since like the Catholic church they are also feminized.
A lot of people will claim that their church is not feminized because of opposition to abortion and gay marriage. This does not mean a thing. It has nothing to do with men. The right question to ask is how the church in question views and deals with men and how they treat women’s sins. In that regard finding a non-feminized church is damned near impossible if not impossible. The Catholic Church hands out annulments like candy legitimizing women divorcing their husbands. Plus they have divorce support groups. Many churches preach “male leadership” but all “male leadership” means is that any sin a woman commits is the fault and responsibility of her husband. Even supposedly “conservative” churches are feminized.
The most promising thing I have heard is about the Orthodox church and this link Novaseeker provided. However, I’m still skeptical. If you read the comments to post that inspired this post, then you will know that it isn’t that simple. Apparently the Greek Orthodox have a problem but if they do why not the rest of the Orthodox? Even if the Orthodox aren’t feminized yet is that because they are resistant to it or because they are not on the radar screen yet? The reason why the Catholic church gets a lot of BS from feminists is not because the Catholic church isn’t feminized. It’s because the Catholic church is a large target, and feminists go after the Catholic church for the same reason bank robbers rob banks. That’s where the money is. In addition it’s a huge argument about how to best hold the whip over men/how to best extract money and resources from men. Both sides are anti-male. My understanding is that the Greek Orthodox church is the largest of the Orthodox churches in North America which would mean that it would make sense for it to be the first of the Orthodox churches to be feminized.
If I was to go to an Orthodox church what would they think of someone like me who is a 32 year old single man? Am I just going to get a lot of shaming language about not being married? About how I’m “lazy”? Or “refuse to grow up” or “man up”? Or are they going to think I’m gay? Because these “conservative” churches claim to be “pro-marriage” (which they really aren’t) all that means is that I’m going to get a lot of BS shaming language about making the sensible decision to avoid getting married.
Since the original post came about because Sabrina was trying to drag me to church all of a sudden the issue came up about an unmarried woman sleeping with her boyfriend having no problem receiving the Eucharist, the question came up of how seriously is sexual morality taken by the Orthodox church. This link describes the problem. To teenagers the Catholic and Protestant churches preach total abstinence before marriage. Once you become an adult that changes to no messages about staying a virgin to the point that anyone who talks about taking virginity seriously as an adult they get shouted down with a barrage of shaming language and twisting of scripture. (Clearly I’m not in a position to make this argument anymore but it’s tied up with churches being feminized so I have to discuss it.) Even if the Orthodox priests preach a consistent position on this regardless of age what about the rank and file? There are plenty of Catholic women who go to church every week or close to every week who were slutting it up the night before. I have trouble believing the Orthodox church is full of female virgins. (In general, there seems to be this idea that somewhere there is a place where there’s lots of female virgins. I don’t believe it exists.) I’m sure women in the Orthodox church put out like women everywhere. (This isn’t a problem but I would like to know what I’m dealing with.)
The case that the Orthodox church isn’t feminized is compelling but I’m not sure I buy it. There’s too much of this “all those other churches are feminized but not MY church”. Why shouldn’t I believe it’s the same everywhere?
Aug 212010
Over at SOTD they had the top 10 cities with the most sluts. DC was not on that list even though it should have been (sort of). That was a list of the most tattooed cities which is proxy for sluts. There are a lot of DC based sluts but as far as I can tell the correlation with tattoos doesn’t really exist here. Most DC based sluts don’t have tattoos like other places. Or maybe I need to look harder in places on the sluts’ bodies that are fully clothed even by sluts. It’s not difficult. Since they’re willing to open up their legs for anyone so they will show you anything. I don’t think they’re hiding any tattoos.
DC…We have sluttier women with less tattoos.
Aug 142010
I’m Catholic sort of. I was baptized, confirmed, the whole bit. I haven’t been to church in years because church is so feminized it’s pointless and has nothing to do with God. Conversion to another religion is not an option since there really isn’t such a thing as a non-feminized church now.
Sabrina is Catholic too. Her ancestry is Italian so she is what might be called Catholic by default since being Catholic is linked into the idea of being Italian. Knowing that she only rarely goes to church if that. I don’t think she’s been to church since I met her several months ago. (Also, there are several ways that Sabrina is not a good Catholic that I can personally attest to.)
This meant that I was dumbfounded when Sabrina started trying to convince me we should go to church. Once I realized what she was doing I asked Sabrina if she felt guilty about how good sex with me was and thought praying to God for forgiveness would help. Sabrina just rolled her eyes in response but she shut up about going to church and hasn’t brought it up again since.
It was very odd.
Aug 092010
I know this is late but I haven’t had a chance to tell you guys what happened at Bohemian Grove recently. As Supreme Overlord of the Illuminati and leader of all reptile aliens on Earth I go there every year for the gathering/orgy.
Hestia, it was nice to meet you in person. We need to conspire together more in the future.
Since I took over the Illuminati I have really cleaned up Bohemian Grove. Before I was in charge the humans there had no self control and would urinate all over the place. You have no idea how disgusting that looks to a reptile alien. The humans still don’t have any self control but I installed a bunch of port-a-johns which must be used under penalty of torture. Most of the humans have managed to clean up their act. Some will accuse me of selling out:
Really, how can I sell out? I run the Illuminati. There’s no one for me to sell out to.
Morons like Alex Jones believe we all worship Moloch at Bohemian Grove. This is incorrect. That ceremony is designed to reinforce the superiority of reptile aliens to the humans there. We don’t want the humans getting all uppity. (Remember reptile aliens are alpha. Greys are beta. Humans are omega. Other aliens are other greek letters.)
There was a lot of talk about how we will continue to rule the world. Various conspiracy theorists think we’re going to invade your dreams. What we have planned is much more insidious. We are going to manufacture cum dumpster servant girls for men. Men will be too busy with their cum dumpster servant girls to care about what we are doing and women will be too busy screaming into the abyss about how men have dumped them for cum dumpster servant girls where no one will hear them. You humans will be happier this way. I had a cum dumpster servant girl sent to Ferdinand and here’s what he had to say about it:
No dude, you got it all wrong. It’s Illuminati reptile alien clit that I’m sucking, literally now that that “cum dumpster servant girl“ PM/AFT promised has finally arrived. She looks like Yvonne Strahovski, can sing arias, cooks and cleans for me, and hits the underside of my dick with her tongue in such a way that I can see heaven every night.
Note: Your cum dumpster servant girl need not look like Yvonne Strahovski if you so desire.
This is the future, and there is nothing you can do to stop it.
Aug 092010
My latest post for The Spearhead is up. As with all Spearhead posts comments are disabled so comment on the post at The Spearhead.
As men realize how shaming language is repetitive, it loses its effectiveness. What female supremacists and their manginas and white knights do is simply produce more shaming language. Another method they use is the expansion of shaming language itself through redefining various terms, such as homosexual, to buttress their poor arguments.
Over at The (Not) Thinking Housewife (where a mangina said that men should be imprisoned on false rape charges to protect women), one of the resident manginas, Josh, tries to claim that anything regarding men’s rights is homosexual. We know this makes no sense, so he tries to redefine what the word “homosexual” means, despite it having a specific definition about being sexually attracted to members of the same sex. Take a look at what Josh had to say:
At root of both the “feminist” movement and its modern mirror, the men’s rights movements, is radical homosexuality (devout dykism), i.e., radical sexual autonomy. Radical sexual autonomy is the biological “goal” of liberalism and the easiest way for a “default elite” to stay in power after convincing a populace to deny Supremacy. A populace in a state of anti-Supremacy and willing to embrace homosexuality is a self-annihilating populace.
The core message of the men’s rights movement (MRM) is to avoid marriage and kids and that Christianity is the liberal juggernaut. This is de facto homo-ism and anti-Supremacy.
The MRM is at root a liberationist movement. Like all liberationist movements, it seeks to dissolve all relations and destroy all impediments to its autonomy. In short, all liberationist movements seek a radical autonomy. But this existence must manifest in the physical world. The two most primitive liberal manifestations are atheism and homosexualism
The MRM is merely a MALE liberationist movement largely driven by atheists and homosexuals. It is “feminism” (euphemism for devout dykism) for males.
I think our common understanding of homosexuality is a false one and it is easy to see why. Homosexuality is, first and foremost, sexual aversion with the “same-sex attraction” merely filling the void. More specifically, male homosexuality and devout dykism are sexual aversions to female and male, respectively. With this aversion and before the “attraction” is homo-sexuality, i.e., self-sexualization, a radical form of autonomy. A homosexual is one that is averse to the Other and attracted to self. He is a radical autonomist and ultimately a self-annihilator.
Putting aside the fact that Josh is guilty of triangulation for trying to equate feminism with men’s rights, he is not only trying to redefine the word homosexual, but uses other terms such as supremacy in a manner that differs from their actual meaning. And why does he capitalize the word “supremacy?” Why doesn’t Josh use words as they are defined in the English language? Because he is white knighting for women and has no real argument against us. Calling us all homosexuals makes no sense. While there are homosexual men as part of the MRM, most of us are not homosexual nor do we have any sort of “homosexual agenda”. What Josh is doing is trying to expand shaming language by redefining words like homosexual so that he can call us all fags. The lack of logic in such a process is clear.
Josh’s real agenda is made clear when he says, “the core message of the men’s rights movement (MRM) is to avoid marriage and kids”. What he is really worried about is that men are leaving the plantation and refusing to be slaves to women. Josh is incapable of admitting that actions like the marriage strike and refusing to have children are rational and sensible responses by men to the fallout caused by feminism. The clear answer to such a problem if you want men to get married and have kids is to fix problems like the family court system, the child custody system, other unjust laws and socialism. This would increase incentives and decrease disincentives for men to get married and have kids. While this seems simple, a white knight like Josh can’t understand this exactly because he is a white knight. Instead, he tries to redefine words like homosexual in a pathetic attempt to tar us with the sodomite brush.
To see how absurd white knights like Josh are being, compare what Josh is doing to what he would be saying if he tried it with other shaming language. Another form of shaming language that gets used against men is, “you have a small penis”. If Josh was trying to redefine that in the same way he is trying to redefine homosexual, he would be claiming that he can say that we all have small penises because our penises are less than 15 inches long.
This is not the first time that someone has tried to redefine the term homosexual beyond sexual attraction to the same sex. Extreme conspiracy theorist, Henry Makow, claims that all porn is gay, even that porn that has only heterosexual sex, and that sex is for procreation and that we are supposed to “outgrow” sex afterwards, with any further sexuality being gay. Josh is a conspiracy theorist because he believes that the MRM, the marriage strike, male refusal to have children, etc. are tools of the “elite” as opposed to a rational and sensible response by men.
We will see more attempts to redefine homosexuality so our opponents can call us “gay” and hope we will obey them for fear of this childish slur. As shaming language loses its effectiveness over time this will have little effect, because the argument is so poorly reasoned that any man with an ounce of common sense could see through it.
For those of you who are watching the second season of Jersey Shore on MTV, it’s important to watch everything available to figure out what is going on including the after show for last week’s episode and this deleted scene:
They try to blame their inability to pump gas on not having to do it in New Jersey. Both Snooki and J-Woww are from New York not New Jersey so they should know how to pump gas like every other person with at least a double digit IQ does. For viewers of Saturday Night Live this scene should have been no surprise since they in a way predicted it over a year ago:
I guess they’re right. Most people in New Jersey lack the skillset of pumping gas, and it’s like brain surgery there.
Aug 032010
Last night I was watching the latest episode of Anthony Bourdain: No Reservations. For those of you who don’t know who he is, he is a chef with a travel show. He told this story about what made him want to be a chef. In college he got a job as a dishwasher. At one point the restaurant where he worked at had a wedding reception while he was working. He discovered one of the chefs was banging the bride in her wedding dress. This happened just an hour or so after the wedding with the reception going on with her husband, family, friends, and the rest of the wedding guests just a few feet away
Something to think about if you ever feel the urge to get married under the current regime.
Recent Comments