Pro-male/Anti-feminist Tech

 

Last month the winner of the December 2011 Entitlement Princess of the Month was Sinead O’Connor for her very short marriage and rest of her behavior.  Remember to keep submitting entitlement princesses on the Entitlement Princess of the Month submission page.

This month we have three entitlement princesses to choose from.  The first was submitted by Carbon 14, and she is Angel Adams, a single mother with 15 kids demanding that “someone [not her] has to pay for them”.  Watch this video which documents her entitlement princessness:

The second entitlement princess was submitted by Anonymous, and she is Hibo Maxamed, a Muslim woman of Somali ancestry living in the UK, who along with her sisters and a cousin attacked a woman for being white.  Maxamed and her sisters and cousin while in court demanded (and ultimately received) a lighter sentence on the grounds that they were drunk and not used to alcohol being Muslim women and that the victim’s boyfriend (who was with the victim when she was attacked) tried to defend her.  After the trial, Hibo Maxamed was asked if she wanted to apologize and her response was, “What, to the public?  I really don’t care.”

The third entitlement princess was submitted by Anonymous, and she is Christina Almanza, a 17-year-old girl who lied to her parents claiming she was kidnapped and being sold into sex slavery in order to cover up her second pregnancy.  She said that she didn’t expect law enforcement to get involved and was just looking for sympathy from her parents.

Vote for one of the entitlement princesses in the poll below.  Remember you are voting for the biggest entitlement princess, not necessarily the most evil woman or the most insane woman.

What is your vote for the January 2012 Entitlement Princess Of The Month?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
 

I found this comment:

rumor has it Elam is the actual man behind the anti-game nonsense

Rumor has it?  Yes, Paul Elam disagrees with game.  Deal with it.  He has better things to do than secretly organize a campaign against game.  It’s things like this that make me embarrassed to be associated with the game community.

 

I added a new page called On Sluts, where I talk about some aspects of sluts you probably haven’t considered.  I’m disabling comments on this post because all of the content is on the new page.  Follow the link or click on the tab at the top of the blog to read the page and comment on it.

 

I have been following Dalrock’s posts about the Costa Concordia disaster.  From there, I found a link to this where a socon/tradcon/conservative female supremacist name Sheila Gregoire was wailing about how men weren’t committing a female supremacist form of seppuku for the benefit of women.  What I mean by a “female supremacist form of seppuku for the benefit of women” is the idea of “women and children first” where men should die for the benefit of women.  It’s similar to seppuku because seppuku was a way for samurai to die “with honor” and because female supremacists like Sheila Gregoire think it’s dishonorable for men to save themselves from a sinking ship.  To her and other female supremacists, this is “dishonorable” so the only way for men to save their honor in their eyes is to willingly die on the ship which is ritualistically committing suicide for women.

If that doesn’t convince you that “women and children first” is feminist/female supremacist, then the next sentence will.  Women and Children First is the name of a feminist bookstore in Chicago.  If “women and children first” wasn’t a feminist idea, then it wouldn’t be the name of a feminist bookstore.  (There aren’t any feminist bookstores named, “Men Are Really Great” after all.)  The only more feminist name for a bookstore would be, “Women and Women First” which is the name of the feminist bookstore in Portlandia.

 

As all of you can tell, I have been pretty absent from the blog.  Real life interferes with my blogging.  That’s why the December 2011 Entitlement Princess of the Month didn’t get done until now.

Last month’s Entitlement Princess of the Month was Kim Kardashian for 72 day marriage to Kris Humphries.  She won by default due to a lack of submissions at the time, and that she deserves a lifetime achievement award for entitlement princessry.

Since this month’s Entitlement Princess award got delayed, all of the submissions will be held for next month except for Twell’s submission of Sinead O’Connor.  (Remember to continue to submit entitlement princesses at this link.)    I’m selected Sinead O’Connor for December’s entitlement princess of the month.  Not only did Sinead O’Connor have a 16 day marriage, she also deserves an entitlement princess lifetime achievement award.

One of the reasons that O’Connor’s marriage only lasted 16 days was that her now ex-husband was pissed that she went looking for drugs right after the wedding.  O’Connor literally chose drugs over her husband.  On top of that this is O’Connor’s fourth marriage despite her vow she made after her second marriage fell apart to never get married again.

Sinead O’Connor has a long history of being an entitlement princess.  In 1991 she boycotted the Grammy Awards where she would have received several awards for its “extreme commercialism.  In 1992 she ripped up a picture of then Pope John Paul II at the end of a performance during Saturday Night Live.  (She intentionally deceived NBC and the crew of Saturday Night Live about her plans to rip up a picture of the Pope by doing something different during rehearsals.)  In 1990 O’Connor whined about playing at a venue that had a tradition of playing the national anthem before performances and made them remove the national anthem before her performance.  In 2000 she came out as a lesbian, but then retracted that shortly afterwards.  She claimed this wasn’t a publicity stunt.

All of this adds up to Sinead O’Connor being the December 2011 Entitlement Princess of the Month.  She is also deserving of an entitlement princess lifetime achievement award.

 

Carbon 14 emailed me a few days ago and asked me why I hadn’t commented on something on Susan Walsh’s blog from several months ago that referenced me.  I haven’t read her blog for a long time except for cases like last month’s debacle where her real attitudes got revealed.  That is the reason why.  Regardless I wish I had known about this sooner because it’s another example showing just how nuts Susan Walsh has become.  (In all of the following blockquotes, I’m also including screenshots of the comments being quoted in case Susan Walsh goes on a deleting spree when this gets posted.)

Several months ago someone using the name of David Jones wrote this comment on HookingUpSmart:  (Screenshot here)

@runningman

I owe you an apology. I thought you were one of the over 30 male virgins. The so called “mens rights” movement is filled with agents of the elite promoting gender war for the purposes of depopulation. I have it on good authority that over 30 virgin males are the primary group recruited by the elite for that purpose.

Clearly, you are not a part of that, and I see that now. I misinterpreted your email, and I’m sorry.

@Susan

With more info about runningman, I see that he’s nothing like Mr. White & Nerdy. I owed him an apology, and I made that apology.

With that said, the so called “mens rights” movement was manufactured by the elite just as feminism was. Gloria Steinem worked for the CIA, and there are agents of the elite in the mens rights movement too. Both sides of the gender war are funded by the elite just as the funded both sides of various wars in history. Virgin males over 30 make excellent recruiting targets for the elite especially the angrier ones. Mr. White & Nerdy is a good example, but he is not the only one. It’s a safe bet Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Tech also works for the elite because he is deeply embedded in the military-industrial-security state complex. He was an over 30 virgin. Supposedly he isn’t anymore, but it doesn’t matter if he is or isn’t a virgin now.

There are others working for the elite that aren’t virgins over 30. It’s clear that The Fifth Horseman works for the elite. The elite is now obsessed with transhumanism, and The Fifth Horseman promotes a “mens rights transhumanism” which is technological gender war.

I suspect others in the mens rights movement of working for the elite but these are the only three I am certain about.

If you can’t get laid, the Illuminati want to recruit you to rule the world.  It makes more sense than a lot of things I have heard in conspiracy theory.

By itself, none of this is particularly notable now.  We have heard the bit about how I work for the Illuminati and that the MRM is some sort of Illuminati program many times before.  We have even heard variations on the “virgin/sexless recruitment” idea before.  Many conspiracy theorists are afraid of transhumanism so that isn’t new either.

Knowing all that, why am I writing a post on this?  Why is someone writing a crazy comment on Susan Walsh’s blog relevant to Susan Walsh?  Many of you are asking that because you automatically assume that Susan Walsh had a normal reaction to such lunacy and regarded it as garbage.  It seems like a reasonable assumption but you are wrong:  (Screenshot here)

@David Jones
That’s a pretty compelling story you’re telling there. W&N and PMAFT have both been very difficult in these comment threads. TFH has also been here, but has never been anything but perfectly civil (though humorless).

Yes, Susan Walsh called a crazy story about the “elite” recruiting sexless men, COMPELLING.  If Susan Walsh chooses to address this, I’m sure she will pull the same tricks she did last month when she said that divorce is overblown in the manosphere.  The fact is that she has no excuse.  If you read the entire page of comments, multiple people recognize David Jones comments as lunacy.  Susan Walsh has no excuse not to recognize this for what it is.  So why did Susan Walsh call a conspiracy theory about me, compelling?  Susan Walsh is in the business of whitewashing sluts or slut rehab.  The problem with “slut rehab” is that more and more men are realizing the truth about pervasive misandry and how that applies to sluts.  The idea of the “former slut” will not gain traction with increasing numbers of men.  If growing numbers of men are taking the position of “once a slut, always a slut”, then what are you left with if you want to rehab sluts?  Besides man up 2.0, the only thing left is to claim that women were “brainwashed” into being sluts.  In other words, being a slut wasn’t their choice but sort of forced upon them so any man refusing to have anything to do with supposedly “former” sluts is just beating up on the “victims” of brainwashing.  The only way to do that is with an absurd conspiracy theory like the one David Jones gave her.

If Susan Walsh thinks all of this is compelling, she probably thinks I’m a reptile alien too.

Lastly, I’m going to include part of David Jones last comment:  (Screenshot here)

The so called “mens rights” movement come into this because it’s the “mirror image of feminism” for men. It’s the male side of the elite’s manufactured gender war. If there’s one thing the “mens rights” males agree on its not getting married. That means less children. Within “mens rights” the MGTOW movement is even more extreme. They promote ghosting for men which involves avoiding women entirely. The more MGTOWs, the less children.

As Gloria Steinem and others worked for the elite in feminism, there are agents of the elite in the “mens rights” movement. Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Tech is deeply embedded in the military-industrial-security state complex. He has admitted this on his blog. That sounds like how Gloria Steinem worked for the CIA. He is acting under orders from his elite masters to grow the “mens rights” movement and promote gender war.

If you want to promote gender war from the male side, who would be the best group to recruit? Angry male virgins who can’t get together with women. Those males are already predisposed to work for the elite’s manufactured gender war. This is where overgrown boys like White & Nerdy come in. (Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Tech may have also been recruited this way. Being in the military-industrial-security state complex he probably knows more of the elite’s plans.) I know of other examples of this. A friend of mine has a brother similar to White & Nerdy. A year ago my friend’s brother started acting and talking like a “mens rights” hard liner that would be at home at the spearhead. My friend’s brother also suddenly got a lot more money at around the same time, and my friend can’t explain how that happened.

The elite are also very interested in transhumanism so that’s how I know The Fifth Horseman is involved. He might not be difficult here but each of the agents has a different job so his doesn’t involve being as hard line as White & Nerdy and Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Tech.

The reason why White & Nerdy and Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Tech have been so hard line is because a blog like yours, Susan, that promotes good relationships between men and women is a threat to the elite’s plans. The “mens rights” movement is still small so your blog can have a real effect, Susan.

Notice I did not talk about lizard people, Illuminati, Freemasons, Bohemian Grove, the occult despite the jokes of a few people here. Such things are distractions to what is really going on. Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Tech makes jokes like that all the time to distract from what he is really doing. Such fantasy is not a part of anything that I said.

Yes, I make jokes about reptile aliens and other things.  When it comes to someone like David Jones, I’m doing him a favor.  Conspiracy theories involving reptile aliens and demonic powers are less crazy than a conspiracy theory that male virgins are getting recruited by the elite.

Update: AmStrat wanted to remind everyone about the research that shows that conspiracy theorists are more willing than the general population to join a conspiracy.  This means that Susan Walsh accusing me of being part of a conspiracy says a lot more about her and her morality than it does about me.

 

Over the holidays I took time off to visit family.  At one point I had nothing to do, and I wasn’t interested in reading the internet through my smartphone anymore so I looked for something to watch on TV.  This is something I don’t usually do as I usually have other things to do.  My TV watching is much more directed towards specific things.  I went through the cable’s On Demand service and found this show called Secretly Pregnant Sluts.  (The actual title is Secretly Pregnant, but Secretly Pregnant Sluts describes the show more accurately.)  It’s on the Discovery Fit & Health channel which is one of the 90% of channels on cable that I never watch because it’s entertainment for women 24/7.  I would assume that a channel called “Fit & Health” would promote fitness and health.  Secretly Pregnant Sluts did neither.

Here are a few of the sluts that were featured on this show:

  1. Bikini Model Slut.  Bikini model slut actually lives in the DC area.  She was keeping her pregnancy a secret because she’s worried that she will lose modeling jobs.  She didn’t even look like a bikini model.  They show her hanging out with her model friends one time and the difference between her and the rest of the models who look like models was striking.  She was a single mother too, but when she got pregnant, she married her boyfriend.  Her kids were from her first marriage, and bikini model slut admitted on camera that her first marriage was just so she could get having kids out of the way and was not for love.  It wasn’t said on camera, but I’m sure she also likes the chilimony check she’s getting.
  2. Ugly Obese Slut.  Ugly obese slut was married during part of the filming.  She was unemployed along with her husband and living with her mom.  She already had one kid she can’t provide for financially.  Eventually, she kicks her husband out.  Before that her husband says on camera says that he has been on job interviews and even gotten job offers, but the jobs “weren’t what he was looking for”.  (I guess he was waiting for a management position.)  Unemployment was a common problem among all the sluts and their husbands and boyfriends.
  3. Ugly Cougar Slut.  Ugly cougar slut was 40 years old and a single mother with a few kids.  She was at a bar and met a 19 year old guy.  They banged, but thought it would be a one night stand until they ended up pregnant.  They decided to try to have a “relationship”, but it was fraught with problems.  The 19 year old guy was unemployed and didn’t have a lot going on upstairs.  (I suspect a scan of his brain would find a large hole where a brain is supposed to be.)  Ugly cougar slut got her man a job at her office.  Eventually, this goes south, and he ends up in jail.  Eventually, ugly cougar slut’s office figures out that the guy she got a job there was her boyfriend so she ends up humiliated at her office due to everything that happened.
  4. College Slut.  There isn’t a lot to say about her that isn’t similar to the other sluts except that she gets knocked up at 19 by her boyfriend.   He is neither in college nor employed.
  5. Ugly Obese Repeat Slut.  Ugly obese repeat slut is also ugly and obese like ugly obese slut.  This slut already had been knocked up in college and was a single mother with one kid.  Now, she’s in her 20s and gets knocked up again.  Her boyfriend spent two years in jail.  She also has “employment difficulties”.
  6. Mistress Slut.  Mistress slut had an affair with a married man.  She gets knocked up by the married guy, but the married guy decides to stay with his wife.  She goes back to the married guy and gets knocked up by him AGAIN.  (Filming takes place during the pregnancy of her second kid.)  She lives in New York City and gets told by her family in Florida to move down to Florida because it’s cheaper.  While mistress slut has a job, NYC is expensive especially with two kids.  However, mistress slut doesn’t want to give up her pseudo sex and the city lifestyle.
  7. Raised By Her Daughter Slut.  This slut was 42 years old and got knocked up by her boyfriend.  She didn’t think she could get pregnant at her age so she wasn’t careful.  She was a single mom with two daughters.  Her oldest daughter who was 22 was obviously the adult in their relationship.  The younger, 17 year old, daughter went to live with the 22 year old because the slut couldn’t take care of her.  This slut spent most of her time worrying about what her 22 year old was going to think of her being pregnant.  The slut’s daughter realizes that the slut’s boyfriend is useless so that feeds into the slut’s freaking out.  She kept saying things like. “If my daughter wants me to give up the baby for adoption, I will do it.”  In terms of freaking out she was worse than all of the other sluts on this show.  She was also unemployed as was her boyfriend.  Her boyfriend didn’t see a problem with this state because he kept saying, “God will provide for us.”

There were other sluts featured in this show, but at this point they’re just like the sluts I listed.  Unemployment, financial, and legal (i.e. jail) problems were commonplace among either the sluts or their men.  Since I don’t want that much TV and ignore most of the channels on my FIOS system (as they are pure female entertainment 24/7), I didn’t realize how bad most of TV has become.  I knew it was bad, but not this bad.  This show is designed to tap straight into the female psyche and rationalization hamster.  The drama could be considered to be manufactured as the sluts are responsible for their situations.  The website for the show even has ideas for its female viewership to manufacture drama with pages like, “5 Reasons to Keep Your Pregnancy a Secret“, “Hiding the Baby Bump“, and “Is He Ready to Be a Dad?”  This show not only features female manufactured drama, but it also shows women new ways to manufacture drama in their own lives.

 

When juggling three women, eventually you will run into a situation where you have to pick one.  Usually, it’s not a problem, but when it comes to something like New Year’s Eve, which is tonight, each of my women want my exclusive presence.  Each of my women think they’re “the girlfriend” and the other two are chicks I occasionally bang.  I have to keep each of them thinking they’re “the girlfriend” since my purpose in picking up women at the Sunday Morning Nightclub is to prevent women from getting their hands on men who they will marry, use up, and divorce.  Thus, I ran into a situation where I had to pick one.

I picked Molly because she’s the newest.  I was looking for a reason to dump Sabrina and Kate.  All of you should remember I already tried that once, and they begged and begged and begged me to take them back which got me to take them back.  I think I have been with the two of them for too long as it is, Sabrina in particular.  Sabrina was sending some strong messages that she was thinking it close to time to get engaged.  Breaking up with Sabrina and Kate wasn’t fun at all.  I will spare you guys the details.  Needless to say they were very angry when they realized they weren’t (or were no longer) “the girlfriend”.  This time, I think my breaking up with them will stick because it was clear I picked another woman over them.

 

I’m really disappointed in the lack of Dilbert Award submissions.   The reason why we only have Dilbert Awards one a quarter instead of once of month is because of the lack of submissions.  Go out and find some successful men who were stupid enough to get involved with a single mother, and submit them here.

A famous Hollywood actor has no problem getting most any woman he wants.  Since he’s on TV and/or movie screens, he gets a lot of visibility so he does not lack in options when it comes to women.  A Hollywood actor has no reason to get together with a single mother, much less one significantly older than him.  Yet, that is what Ashton Kutcher, this quarter’s Dilbert Award winner, did when he married Demi Moore.  While it was absurd for Ashton Kutcher to get married to a woman 16 years older then him, he also got married to a single mother.  Demi Moore has three children from her marriage to Bruce Willis.  While Kutcher and Moore are currently separated and on their way to getting divorced, the fact is that Ashton Kutcher married a single mother 16 years older than him and spent 6 years married to her.  That makes him eligible for the Dilbert Award, and why I selected him for this quarter’s winner.

Normally there would be voting like with the Entitlement Princess of the Month, but due to the lack of submissions, Kutcher wins the 2011 Fourth Quarter Dilbert Award by default.

 

At least according to this (H/T: The MGTOW Forums):

By Curtis Powers, curtis.powers@iowastatedaily.com

When I look at the various social problems in America, there seems to be one common link: a lack of good men.

Men who will take responsibility for their actions and not fear commitment. Men who will get married, raise their children well, work hard at their job and for their community, and be a voice for the poor and oppressed.

Maybe that’s a sweeping generalization or an oversimplification of things, but hang with me on this. Let’s look at some major issues, for example the financial crisis and abortion. Then let’s examine more root-level issues like video games.

Let’s start with the financial crisis. From an article in The Atlantic, it appears porn may have helped start our financial collapse in 2008. Here are some noteworthy lines from the story:

“A senior attorney — a man — at the SEC’s Washington headquarters spent up to eight hours a day looking at and downloading pornography.”

“An accountant was blocked more than 16,000 times in a month from visiting websites classified as ‘sex’ or ‘pornography.’ Yet, he still managed to amass a collection of ‘very graphic’ material on his hard drive by using Google images.”

“The number of cases jumped from two in 2007 to 16 in 2008. The cracks in the financial system emerged in mid-2007 and spread into full-blown panic by the fall of 2008.”

That’s a pretty alarming report and speaks volumes. After all, what are you doing looking at porn, especially at work? Especially in that quantity. Also, where’s the accountability from other people within the agency? It’s surprising in this day and age that it would go unnoticed for so long.

How about abortion? Another article on The Catholic Education Resource Center’s website, stated, “Nearly 40 percent of post-abortive women in one study reported that partners pressured them into having the abortions.”

“Indeed, in her study of the data, Emory University professor Elizabeth Fox-Genovese reports that ‘the most enthusiastic fans of abortion have been men — at least until they have children of their own.’”

It is very sad to hear that some men would force women into having abortions. A woman shouldn’t have to face that kind of pressure when dealing with an unplanned pregnancy.

She should be able to count on the unquestioned support of her partner. However, in this day and age, most men don’t want to grow up and in this case, take responsibility for helping raise their own children.

This trend is called by some as “emerging adulthood.” More accurately for men, it could probably be called the Cartman Syndrome, which can be summarized with the following quote: “I’ll do what I want, whatever I want, for as long I want, and never grow up unless I have to.”

Therefore, as the City Journal points out, “Single Young Males, or SYMs, by contrast, often seem to hang out in a playground of drinking, hooking up, playing ‘Halo 3,’ and, in many cases, underachieving. With them, adulthood looks as though it’s receding.”

This is illustrated most poignantly with video games. Check out this stat from the same article which is appropriately entitled, “Child-Man in the Promised Land.”

“Those boys have grown up to become child-man gamers, turning a niche industry into a $12 billion powerhouse. Men between the ages of 18 and 34 are now the biggest gamers; according to Nielsen Media, almost half — 48.2 percent — of American males in that age bracket had used a console during the last quarter of 2006, and did so, on average, two hours and 43 minutes per day. (That’s 13 minutes longer than 12 to 17-year-olds, who evidently have more responsibilities than today’s twentysomethings.)”

That is simply shocking, appalling even. Expand that out over a week and it’s roughly 19 hours. That’s a part-time job!

Women, on the other hand, seem to be doing just the opposite. Right before that line describing young, single men, it states, “But while we grapple with the name, it’s time to state what is now obvious to legions of frustrated young women: the limbo doesn’t bring out the best in young men.”

“With women, you could argue that adulthood is in fact emergent. Single women in their twenties and early thirties are joining an international New Girl Order, hyperachieving in both school and an increasingly female-friendly workplace, while packing leisure hours with shopping, traveling, and dining with friends.”

No wonder women make up 60 percent of college graduates today.

Anyway, it’s been hard for me to pinpoint an underlying problem. Though like the previous article I wrote about “Amusing ourselves to death,” it seems to be more a problem of men loving what will ruin us.

However, there seems to be one thing that can help us — men — think about how we’re doing. Ask yourself this question: When I die, what will my obituary say? More importantly, what will your family say about you?

Will it say, “Here lies [your name]. He wasted his life on sports, movies, video games and porn. He died alone in a nursing home.”

Or will it say, “Here lies [your name]. He worked hard at his job, for his community, and stood up for the poor and the oppressed. He leaves behind his wife, lots of children,and lots of grandchildren who dearly loved him and will do things even greater than he.”

I hope that one day I will be able to look back upon my life when I am old and know that I have left a legacy for future generations. I hope that you men can, too.

There are so many things wrong with this that I don’t know where to begin.  It just speaks for itself.

 

I have been busy, so I haven’t commented much on the latest Susan Walsh debacle at Dalrock’s where she says that divorce only happens because men cheat on their wives.  Everyone is saying what needs to be said, so I am not concerned about contributing.  If you want to find out what Susan Walsh is really all about then that post and all of the comments will provide you with an excellent education on the subject.  She really digs a hole for herself and shows her true colors.

I’m glad to see that more and more people are finally figuring out everything I have known about Susan Walsh for close to two years.  I knew eventually she would say something that would demonstrate her game 2.0/man up 2.0 attitudes.  If you want to know something before other people do, you should be reading this blog.

It’s clear to me that Susan Walsh is on the same path as Obsidian, who over time crashed and burned as the truth about him came out.  (I also figured out Obsidian long before most anyone else.)  Susan Walsh is really Obsidian 2.0.

 

Today is December 21st 2011.  One year from today is when lots of people are saying the world will end or mostly end because of some nonsense about the Mayan calendar.  It’s all nonsense.  One year from today, nothing will happen except maybe some morons going nuts.

The “Mayan calendar” only ends on 12/21/12 in the same way a 2011 calendar ends on 12/31/11.   The world isn’t going to end on 12/31/11, and it’s not going to end on 12/21/12 either.  The “Mayan calendar” that ends in 2012 is known as the long count calendar.  The Mayans actually had several long count calendars, some of which have already “ended”.  If you think Mayan calendars mean anything when it comes to the end of the world, then since some of the long count calendars have ended already means the world has already ended several times over.  Everything is a figment of your imagination.

Penn & Teller when they had their Bullshit! show did an episode on 2012.  They talk to various scientists plus experts in Mayan culture and history including an actual Mayan princess.  All of them say that the world isn’t going to end on 2012, especially the Mayan princess.  (The video of that episode is below, but parts of it are NSFW):

Neil deGrasse Tyson, author and director of the Hayden Planetarium, has also been active explaining 2012:

NASA put out this video explaining some of the facts about 2012:

A year from today I am going to write another post title, “We’re Still Here” because we will all be still here.  End of story.

 

My latest post for The Spearhead is up. As with all Spearhead posts comments are disabled so comment on the post at The Spearhead.

When someone is talking about mens’ rights issues or anything that only affects or disproportionately affects men, a common response is some derivative of “women have it just as bad.”  This response will be used no matter how absurd it is when applied to the issue or issues being discussed.  For example, if an MRA is discussing what happens to men during and after divorce, someone will respond that women suffer just as much from divorce. Obviously, this is not the case, because women wouldn’t disproportionately initiate divorce proceedings otherwise. What these people are doing is promoting a myth of equal suffering.

Why do we have a myth of equal suffering?  It is because feminists – and even many anti-feminists (who are really anti-feminist in name only, or AFINOs) – don’t want to admit that there are certain issues (such as divorce) where men bear the overwhelming brunt of the negative impact. Feminists will use this myth in an attempt to shut down any effort to show that their policies and actions are attacking men. AFINOs will also use the myth to hide the fact that women who don’t claim to be feminists are still benefiting from feminism.  For them, it’s an attempt to pretend that the benefits of feminism are going to some far away group of feminist women instead of both feminist women and AFINO women. This can be seen with divorce where women who don’t claim to be feminists divorce as often as self-admitted feminist women do. It can also be seen when someone says, “But feminism hurts women too”.

The myth of equal suffering is not used in the opposite direction. If something were to disproportionately affect women, these people will not talk about how men are suffering just as much from the same problem. This is because the true purpose of the myth of equal suffering is not to demonstrate that men and women suffer equally: it is to diminish problems experienced by men so that women can be shown to be suffering more. This serves the purpose of adding more power to women via victimhood. It is similar to how feminism in general claims to support equality when in reality it is promoting an agenda of female supremacism.

 

My latest post for The Spearhead is up. As with all Spearhead posts comments are disabled so comment on the post at The Spearhead.

In this part of the internet there are many traditionalists and others who attack the idea of going ghost and try to promote marriage.  They will repeatedly say that they are “defending marriage”.  For those of us who know the score about marriage 2.0 and how marriage 1.0 is already dead in Western countries, these “defenders of marriage” are either intentionally or unintentionally pushing men into the feminist institution of marriage 2.0.  Many of these “defenders of marriage” will claim that they are just trying to protect ”traditional marriage” (i.e. marriage 1.0) from those who are trying to “destroy marriage” (which typically means MRAs to them, even though MRAs aren’t trying to “destroy marriage,” but warn men of the dangers of marriage 2.0).  How do we know whether these “defenders of marriage” are legitimate in their defense of marriage, or are just trying to force men to submit to a conservative/traditional form of feminism?  The answer is the expat test.

In these arguments for and against marriage, the debate is presented as getting married vs. not getting married.  This is an inaccurate way to frame how men are dealing with the current situation regarding marriage.  There are more than just those two answers — there are actually three options:

  1. Get married in a marriage 2.0 (feminist) country
  2. Get married in a marriage 1.0 country (which by definition involves expating, because bringing a woman to a marriage 2.0 country ends up being option 1)
  3. Don’t get married whether you expat or not

Anyone who claims to defend “traditional marriage” should love option 2.  They should love the idea of a man making sure that he gets a traditional marriage by expating to a marriage 1.0 county.  It shouldn’t matter to them where a traditional marriage happens as long as it happens.  This objectively does more to preserve “traditional marriage” – by any definition that the “defenders of marriage” would use – than getting married in a marriage 2.0 country, which does nothing to preserve traditional marriage.

If you confront “defenders of marriage” with the expat test, what will their response be?  Typically, they will be against the idea of a man expating to another country to enjoy a traditional marriage.  They will come up with all sorts of nonsense to argue against expating to contract a marriage 1.0 arrangement. The arguments range from culture to, in extreme cases, white nationalism/racial obligations.  In other words, in nearly all cases, a “defender of marriage” will fail the expat test, proving that their real goal has nothing to do with “traditional marriage;” instead, it is about placating the women in their churches and producing more babies.  Their push for marriage is really about white knighting for women and/or their fear that their group or race is not having enough babies.

If you’re reading this, it’s likely none of this is is new to you. However, the expat test still has value because it can be used as a tool to prove objectively that nearly all “defenders of marriage” aren’t actually defending marriage, but have other goals, none of which take men’s interests into consideration.

 

Anonymous Reader gave an explanation of the three possible ways that misandry could unwind in the future:

Regarding the unwind of misandry TFH prefers one form of unwind to another.

Zed
Someone is dumping raw sewage into the lake where I get my drinking water. There is no “sacrifice” at all in trying to stop them. I am part of “the common”, and the common good is also my good. I like drinking fresh, pure, water. Doesn’t everyone?

Sure. Consider three options:

Door # 1. You take the offender to court, a jury finds the other party is guilty of a tort, orders them to stop doing that bad thing and to pay damages to you, with the threat of imprisonment for repeat offenses or failure to pay.

Door #2. You get some friends together, go find the offender, take him out and beat the snot out of him, then throw him in the effluent runoff with a warning to “stop this, now, or you’ll get more of the same”.

Door #3. You get a lot of friends together, with weapons and torches. You find the offender, beat him as badly as you want to, then hang him by the neck from the nearest tree until he is dead, and leave his body hanging as a warning to others. You burn his house to the ground. You hunt down all his relatives and kill them as well; men, women, children, babies, old grannies, all of them. You burn all their houses, barns, cars, everything to ashes. If anyone gets in the way, you kill them, too. If anyone tries to defend any of the offenders relations, you kill them and burn their house as well.

Three solutions. Each one will end the problem of raw sewage in your drinking water. However, not all of them are going to lead to the same sort of society, right? I think that this is more or less what TFH is trying to suggest – orderly unwind, vs. disorderly unwind, vs. catastrophic unwind, there is a difference.

Historically, humans have employed all three of the methods above. The more desperate and frustrated and angry that people become about a problem, the more the solution tends away from Door #1, and towards Door #3. I am pretty sure that none of us want to live in the world that Door #3 leads to.

 

I found this comment on Alucin’s blog (that wasn’t from Alcuin himself):

Please, would you and the others in the manosphere quit using the Jew analogy! The whole holocaust fairytale is complete bullshit. I believed it for most of my life, just like you, how couldn’t we? It is all we are taught, or better said, it is all we are told, thousands upon thousands of times, everyday, everywhere we turn, pretty much from the age we learn to speak. But you’re obviously a bright guy that thinks for himself, so look into. We have the net now, you can educate yourself on so many things, like I am sure you did about the feminist lie. There is a ton of information out there. The Holohaux scam is falling apart, and fast, just like so many of the other scams. Get on the wave so as not to lose credibility. You’re a good writer.

And no, I am not a Neo-Nazi, or a “Jew-hater”, or any of the like…..just someone with a passion for the truth……..

I say keep using Jew analogies.  Not only did the holocaust happen, but what happened to the Jews is an apt metaphor for is happening to men.  I also like how it pisses off white nationalists.

 

I have been watching this TV series on the Starz channel called Boss.  It’s about a corrupt mayor of Chicago (yes, that’s redundant) that’s on his way down played by Kelsey Grammer.  One of the things Boss features (especially since Starz is a premium cable channel and can feature female nudity) is the male politicians banging chicks other than their wives.  What’s really interesting is the reactions of the politicians’ wives.  The mayor bangs other women.  This comes up in a conversation with his wife due to a neurological disease he has because his neurologist is female.  (The mayor doesn’t bang the neurologist.)  The mayor didn’t want tell his wife about the illness, but the mayor’s wife found out he’s been going to see this female doctor.  When the mayor’s wife confronts the mayor about this, the mayor says (to hide his illness), “Since when do you care where I stick it?”  She doesn’t really care if the mayor fucks other women.

There’s another example that’s even better.  Another politician is running for governor of Illinois under the direction of the mayor.  He gets convinced to instead run against the mayor later by a group that is trying to take down the mayor.  Eventually, the mayor finds out about this and to get that politician to start doing his bidding again, the mayor sends some photos of the gubernatorial candidate banging another chick to his wife.  When the candidate’s wife saw the photos, she was angry but not because her husband was banging other women.  She didn’t care about that.  She was angry because he got caught, and it nearly derailed her political plans.

These examples are fiction, but it reflects how my women don’t seem to care about me banging other chicks that much.  There might be some token resistance initially, but in the end they don’t really care, or they accept it.  Despite some claims to the contrary, I’m not a politician so this reflects a much larger reality beyond the political sphere.  There’s also an interesting warning about this sort of thing.  The gubernatorial candidate is pretty much under his wife’s thumb.  She just doesn’t care about controlling who he has sex with.  It’s something to think about, but it probably can only happen if you get married.

 

This was written a long time ago, and I wasn’t aware of it until yesterday when I read about it on another blog:

The Jews in charge see the MRM as benign and non-threatening and useful too. Some time ago I looked at some MRM websites, and they all had one thing in common. If you did what they said, you would be contributing to the end of the white race.

There’s an MRM blog called “Citizen Renegade” where the author who is a Jew tells white men how to “game” women for one night stands. White men who listen to Mr. Renegade will not have relationships with white women or form families meaning that the next generation of whites will be smaller. There’s another MRM blog called “Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Technology”. It should be called Pro-Jew/Anti-White Technology. The author there encourages men to only have children with Indian surrogate mothers in India. I also found a guy there called The Fifth Horseman, a Hindu Indian, who brags about how he tricked women into miscegenation by donating sperm to a sperm bank and claiming he was white on their paperwork. There’s also a blog called “Omega Virgin Revolt” that is about nothing but generating hate among white men for white women.

The MRM is Jew run movement for preventing white men from forming families with white women and killing off white children before they’re even conceived. If you aren’t convinced the MRM is a Jew run movement go to any MRM blog and you will find them defending the Jew Strauss-Kahn and saying that Jew is a victim.

This is just another example of how white nationalism is really white knight nationalism.

 

When it comes down to it, game 2.0 proponents don’t truly understand game.  They may think they do, but they don’t.  What they’re dealing with is a “watered down” version of game:

“that is NOT game 101. that is WATERED DOWN game 101.”

Yes. Exactly.

Susan’s biggest problem is that she *thinks* she understands game, and men.

Well, it’s not what we know in life that gets us into trouble; it’s what we think we know that just ain’t so.

Susan is, and will always be, part of Team Woman.

What does “watered down game” attempt to produce?  Some would call it a “better beta”, but it would be accurate to say a “better” chump.  The biggest threat to form of promiscuity women prefer is men who were supposed to be the chumps that they married realizing the truth and avoiding becoming a chump.  Whether these men decided to become a PUA or a ghost or something in between doesn’t matter.  With knowledge these men can choose a path other than being a chump.  The weakest link (to women) in the female preferred form of promiscuity is finding a chump when a woman is done with the alpha carousel because either the chumps will discover the truth and not be chumps or the chumps won’t be attractive to women.  Game 2.0 tries to attack that problem by watering down game so only the desired result of a “better” chump can be produced.  This will never work since game 2.0 proponents don’t truly understand game in the first place.

 

Sometimes, I think someone from the manosphere must be a writer for Saturday Night Live.  This time there was a SNL skit taking on the false abuse industry using the backdrop of the actual abuse scandals involving Jerry Sandusky of Penn State and Bernie Fine at Syracuse:

 

The Fifth Horseman had this to say on the outsourcing/offshoring of jobs:

Not many people realize that outsourcing happens mostly due to feminism.

Feminists impose all sorts of costs on businesses in the US, who are forced to employ women despite the low productivity of these female employees.

Since an office is not allowed to have too many men, the next best answer is to move the entire department to India or China, where Western feminists can no longer harass it.

Since Western women cost more than what Western men produce, outsourcing is inevitable, as a means to avoid feminism.

This is true.  Plenty of people have tried to run the numbers on the offshoring of jobs, but they can never figure out where the savings are supposed to be.  Business would only offshore jobs if it made financial sense, and running the numbers indicates that it doesn’t make financial sense because any savings gets eaten up by the costs of offshoring.  That is the case until you include the costs of feminism in the analysis.  When someone runs the numbers on offshoring, they don’t include things like the costs of the false sexual harassment industry, affirmative action, and pure makework jobs for women in their analysis.  As soon as feminism is included, offshoring makes perfect financial sense for business.  In fact, it’s surprising that there isn’t more offshoring of jobs.

If you want jobs to come back to the US (and elsewhere), then you have to eliminate feminism.

 

 

This post could be considered NSFW.  Don’t complain because I warned you in the title.

I disagree.  I’m a hands on type of guy.

 

The votes are in for the October 2011 Entitlement Princess Of The Month.  With 57% of the vote, Nicole “Snooki” Polizzi beat out Victoria Liss for the October 2011 Entitlement Princess of the Month.

Remember to submit new entitlement princesses for next month’s voting, at this link.  Without you submitting entitlement princesses, this contest can not continue.

This month we only have one entitlement princess submitted by Anonymous, Kim Kardashian.  Without any other submissions Kim Kardashian wins by default (so no voting this month), but even if there we’re other submissions, I would have held on to those for next month since Kim Kardashian clearly deserves to be this month’s entitlement princess.  Her entire life has been one of being a entitlement princess, but what caused her to get this month’s entitlement princess award was divorcing her husband, Kris Humphries, after being married to him for only 72 days as soon as she made $17 million off getting married to Humphries.  One of the Kardashian reality shows will be edited to make Humphries look like a villan.

On top of this, Kim Kardashian has said that she hopes everyone respects her “courage” for her acts of entitlement princessery.  If there is ever a lifetime achievement entitlement princess award, she is guaranteed to get it.

 

Sorry about the delay getting this out.  Things are busy this week for me.

Originally, I wasn’t going to say anything about the Elam-Frost debate.  To me it was an epic failure from almost all perspectives that I best avoided.  However, as I wrote my post on Man Up 2.0 & Game 2.0, I changed my mind because I realized there is a fundamental failure in in the Gamer vs. MRA wars.  I will talk about that later in this post.  First, to get a flavor of my thoughts (and of MGTOW in general about this), read what some of the men at the MGTOW Forums had to say about the Elam-Frost debate:

Frankly, while I think I follow their individual points, I can’t figure out just what the debate is supposed to be about. Seems to me it boils down to

Elam (zeta male): “Chasing pussy is more trouble than its worth!”

Frost (PUA): “No, it isn’t!”

So it mostly works out as both of them calling each other a fool or other slurs. I’m pretty disgusted by it. And I usually like Elam. Am I missing something?

——–

I don’t really see the point. The only overlap between the Game community and MRAs is within the values of individuals.

Being a PUA is about getting laid. Being a MRA is about actually changing things or at least making a stand. One group is focused on fucking women while the other is an activist group. The aims of the two groups are completely different.

I don’t have a problem with guys learning stuff to get laid but it has little to do with the legal and cultural realities we deal with.

——–

I’m so bored with the PUA versus MRA debate that I could spit. It’s as easy as ‘To thine own self be true’ imho. I’m not about to become dogmatic about MGTOW; seems like a contradiction to me. Men need to stick together these days. Pussy has divided us enough. To each their own.

——–

True. Men can go their own way and definitely have sex. There’s a difference between that and letting it “control” you though, (like a drug). Also jumping through hoops or ego boosting to get laid is counterproductive. If you don’t do those things, that’s great.

——–

I listened to the AVoiceForMen radio podcast last night and was so disappointed. As a MGTOW, I already feel pretty disconnected from most of the blue-pill world as it is. At least most of the PUA’s recognize thatsomething isn’t right. That’s enough for me to feel like those guys, while they don’t have the same end-goal as me, at least aren’t fumbling around in the dark wondering what happened. Basically, I never felt like the PUA guys are “the enemy”. And it seemed like Paul has been really pushing for that. Very disappointing.

——–

I think it’s important to understand that MGTOW, MRA and PUA aren’t mutally exclusive or inclusive. You can be all three at once or just one. The fact that most guys who fit in one category usually fit into one of the others doesn’t really mean that the three things are significantly related.

You can be a MGTOW ghost and not be an MRA, like I am. There are PUAs that are non-MGTOW pussy beggars and PUAs that are MGTOW.

——-

I thought MGTOW was about … Men Going Their Own Way … or am I missing something?

Be fucked if I stick to some stupid rule book – for anything.

The whole debate was a disaster from the beginning in my opinion.  Elam saying that all you need to do is take a shower to get women was silly.  However, Frost made a mountain out of a molehill and actually implied that MRAs are trying to trick men into celibacy.  It got worse from there.  There was no way that this debate could get to any reasonable conclusion.

There were several definition and scope problems, like when either of them are talking about game, what are they including or excluding?  Things are not helped by how 90% of game advice is BS and how most gamers and PUAs have never heard of mens rights.  Worse, many of them are self admitted feminists.  The response to this will be that we’re only talking about the Roissysphere, as Frost said, (which is valid and I have no problem with) but that has problems too.  It still includes Roosh, the guy that said mens rights is a euphemism for sexual loser.  If this debate happened a year ago, Obsidian Trollsidian would be included too.

The Roosh and Trollsidian examples are sideshows compared to the real problem of scope here.  The real problem comes from the Man Up 2.0/Game 2.0 contingent.  What is Man Up 2.0/Game 2.0 all about?  Co-opting game or manosphere ideas in general by providing minimal or fake empowerment of men for the purpose of benefiting women. In the mens rights world we have already dealt with the mens rights equivalent which include the socons/tradcons, white nationalists, and other fringe groups trying to co-opt the MRM. In the game world this has not been dealt with yet.

This isn’t just an academic question. Game 2.0 subverts game in a manner similar to how marriage 2.0 subverts marriage. It’s also no surprise that the same groups that promote game 2.0 are the same groups that tried to co-opt mens rights. Some of them are just trying to defend the status quo and the preferred female form of promiscuity like Susan Walsh. Others are just pissed that MRAs don’t hate blacks and Jews such as 1stdv who said this about the Elam-Frost debate:

I’ve long suspected that many MRAs are motivated primarily by a pathological hatred of white women and not women in general. For example, one MRA who I will not name gave a sperm sample and listed his race as Caucasian despite being East Indian – and then bragged about getting back at some white feminist when a brown baby comes out. This might be one of the sickest things I’ve read on the Internet, but it fits well into the pathological hatred of white women. Further, blaming (white) women for our troubles partially absolves “people of color”.

If one were to apply what Paul Elam said about game to just the Man Up 2.0/Game 2.0 morons, then Elam would me more or less completely correct.  (The Game 2.0 morons do not need to actually understand game at all. All they “know” about game is that it can be used in a bastardized form to bludgeon men and attack mens rights.) However, Elam is not willing to make this distinction. The other side doesn’t see the problem.

There were also other problems with this whole debate such as other gamers who couldn’t understand that there is a false rape industry, but no rape industry, and many other side problems that are too numerous to list here.

Lastly, there is no one strategy that will defeat misandry by itself. The entire principle if MGTOW is each man going his own way, not Frost’s way or Elam’s way. I found Frost saying that the “seduction community” would defeat feminism incredibly laughable (beyond the fact that most of the seduction community has never heard of mens rights or is explicitly pro-feminist).

In the end I still respect Paul Elam. He does things to advance the MRM even though he doesn’t understand the actual problem here. I didn’t care about Frost before this, and I care even less about him now. I find his dedication to nebulous and poorly defined “self-improvement” a waste of time especially when it comes to the paleo diet plan, something that will be in the dustbin of history in a year or two like every other diet of the last few decades.

© 2009 - 2011 Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Technology Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha