A mangina tried to answer the question of whether feminists/SJWs want women to be equal to men or be a protected class. As can be expected the mangina twists himself into knots to avoid giving a clear answer to that question to the point where he seriously compares women to the disabled:
You may still need accommodations to function in society that others do not require. That doesn’t mean that you’re unequal any more than a disabled person is a second-class citizen for needing a ramp.
For the purpose of this post, I’m going to set aside how vile it is and insulting to disabled people to compare the average healthy woman to a disabled person. This mangina is saying that being female is a (permanent) disability. Thus he’s arguing that women will always need special accommodations forever. By doing so this mangina is really saying that women are MORE disabled than disabled people because eventually technology will exist that will fix every disability out there.
I anticipate that we will see more of this “women are disabled” argument. It may be argued implicitly or explicitly, but feminists will latch on to it to defend all the special privileges women have. It will get to the point where you will see an able bodied woman telling a man with no legs in a wheelchair why she is the one who is really disabled.