Oct 302015
 

It’s impossible to talk about space exploration nowadays without talking about Elon Musk, the founder of SpaceX (and Tesla Motors and SolarCity).  Thus, it is not surprising that feminists have declared war on Elon Musk.  For example, this feminist article from The Guardian falsely accuses Elon Musk (along with Jeff Bezos and Richard Branson who have their own aerospace businesses) of working on a secret plan to allow the rich to escape EarthAnother feminist attacked Musk for describing humanity as stuck on Earth as well as Musk’s South African heritage. (She also said that the colonization of Mars was “white colonialism”.)  Another article from The Guardian said that Musk’s work would lead to a #GamerGate takeover of Mars.  Feminist attacks on Musk aren’t limited to things related to space exploration.  Musk was falsely accused of berating an employee who missed a meeting to be at the birth of his child.

Why do feminists attack Elon Musk?  Some of it has to do with his involvement in the tech industry, namely PayPal.  (That is why Jeff Bezos and Richard Branson were attacked along with him.)  Musk is now the most visible proponent of space exploration, particularly private space exploration.  In other words, he can’t be shutdown with politics like NASA can.  The fundamental reason is that Musk’s goals are the direct opposite of the goals of feminists.  Musk wants humanity to survive, and survival requires that humanity not be stuck on one planet.  Musk is working to ensure the future of humanity with his goal of colonizing Mars.  Feminists don’t care about that because they are greedy and it doesn’t benefit them.  Plus, if Musk is successful in colonizing Mars then nerds, gamers, and every other man that feminists hate will have a place to go that is outside of the reach of feminists.  Feminists can’t stand that.

  19 Responses to “The Feminist War On Elon Musk”

  1. […] an intelligent species can guarantee long term survival is to become an interplanetary species.  Men like Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Richard Branson understand this and are putting their money towa…  Feminists are doing the opposite by opposing space exploration.  If we follow the feminists, we […]

  2. I believe that it is unlikely that mankind or the rich will manage to out emigrate Feminist perfidy. http://amzn.com/B00B5HJOFY

  3. “Musk wants humanity to survive”.

    Nonsense. He wants a certain aspect of humanity to survive. Anything that falls outside a future that embraces his technocratic worldview is irrelevant to him. His is no different to any other exercise in futilty.

    “Humanity” is so much more than mastery of the physical universe, and “survival” is so much more than preserving the bloodline. Solar power, electric cars and Mars colonisation will not remove the far greater threat to humanity’s survival: the belief that self-made systems can resolve the illusion of self-sufficiency.

    Musk is merely transporting humanity to the next empty space where Man can preen himself in self-congratulation. He also wants to “die there…but not immediately”. This sums up the technocratic worldview quite well. To the technocrat, humanity is merely a means to an end – a sacrificial anode if you like.

    The feminists are responding in the same godless fashion as Musk. They don’t understand that what Musk and Co are doing will solve nothing for humanity if we aren’t united in our understanding of why such sacrifice should matter. Neither does Musk. If we’re talking about the survival of humanity and not merely homo sapiens, then we need to understand humanity more than space travel. Feminists can help with that no more than Iron Man can.

    • So whats your solution, if you dont believe in space travel or technocracy?

      • I never wrote I don’t “believe” in those things. They are what they are. What I wrote was that technocracy of the Muskish kind cannot help humanity survive. It might help the species survive, but “humanity”?

        Humanity is the collective personhood of people, not merely the bodily shell that conveys them. Neither technocracy nor space travel has anything to do with preserving personhood.

        To preserve personhood on a global scale, we need to adopt a worldview that embodies hope. Not merely the hope that comes from successful manned missions to Mars, which has a far bigger chance of contributing to precisely nothing of lasting value in the future of homo sapiens than anything else, but a hope that brings to each and every person who lives and will ever live a personal way to not merely survive, but flourish.

        Call it “tradcon” if you like, but reducing this to a two-dimensional idea is foolish. It’s at the very least a four-dimensional problem, probably more. It can’t be solved in two or even three dimensions. It can’t even be viewed properly.

        To illustrate the dimensional perception problem search for and download “4D Rubik’s Cube” and “5D Rubik’s Cube”. As you’re playing around with the cubes, try to imagine a cube in billions of dimensions, one for each person who lives and will ever live. Then try to imagine a solution.

        I doubt a technocrat can. But a tradcon can. He doesn’t even have to imagine as we already have the solution. We just need to learn it and move the bloomin’ cubes for Christ’s sake.

        Come back and comment when you’ve had a play and more of a think.

        • Jacob,

          The claim that Traditional Conservatives are brilliant thinkers is beyond laughable.

          For one thing, TradCons are quick to ditch the Bible and adopt ‘feminism’, even while insisting they oppose ‘feminism’, when the opportunity to grovel to women presents itself. They love any and all secular leftism as long as it is packaged as ‘men bad, women good’.

          You better go to Dalrock’s blog and read how rotten and ideologically empty Traditional Conservatives (i.e. woman-pedestalizers) have become.

          https://dalrock.wordpress.com/

          You have a long way to go before you understand how conservatives think.

        • But a tradcon can. He doesn’t even have to imagine as we already have the solution.

          I notice you don’t elaborate on your ‘solution’. Your solution is :

          Single motherhood is the fault of men, so punish men.
          Abortion is the fault of men, so punish men.
          Divorce is the fault of men, so punish men.
          Grovel to women, even though women hate that, and the GOP has successfully been painted as ‘anti-woman’.

          Frankly, no group is further from figuring out the proper solution for the 21st century that TradCons.

          To preserve personhood on a global scale, we need to adopt a worldview that embodies hope.

          This is the only correct thing you said. The problem is, governments profit from exacerbating hopelessness (the opposite of hope), and the Tradcon solution is to punish men and give even more power to women. No other thought ever registers with Tradcons (who are not traditional at all, since they overtly violate the Bible at all times).

        • Of course, you can’t explain your supposed “solution”. That’s because it doesn’t exist, and you are trying to hide that with mystical mumbo jumbo. We see right through you.

        • Of course, you can’t explain your supposed “solution”. That’s because it doesn’t exist, and you are trying to hide that with mystical mumbo jumbo. We see right through you.

          You see nothing but projections of your own ignorance. The explanation you seek is all around you, you’ve simply chosen to keep your eyes closed. Nothing mystical about opening your eyes. No use criticizing from ignorance and impotence. Read the Great Books for Men. Read the Bible. Open your eyes and see. Use the internet.

          Elon Musk can build a ship, and should if he wants, but he can’t stop humanity from perishing by their own ignorance. I daresay he’ll be the first to tell you that. Ask him…I’ll wait.

        • Read the Great Books for Men

          You gave yourself away with this. We know who you really are now.

        • “Humanity” is so much more than mastery of the physical universe,

          But look at what mastery of the physical universe has gotten us. We went from being a minor hominid species to the masters of the planet. Elon Musk simply wants us to keep up the good work.

          To preserve personhood on a global scale, we need to adopt a worldview that embodies hope.

          Please elaborate on how you intend to get all of humanity to adopt the same worldview.

          I doubt a technocrat can. But a tradcon can. He doesn’t even have to imagine as we already have the solution.

          Tradcons are a bunch of pussy-whipped manginas hellbent on catering to the Feminine Imperative (FI). We can’t have women running the show since their concerns are too self-centered, materialistic, and irrational.

        • But look at what mastery of the physical universe has gotten us. We went from being a minor hominid species to the masters of the planet. Elon Musk simply wants us to keep up the good work.

          And if my theory about the Fermi Paradox is right, Musk (and others like him) will take us from being the masters of one planet to being masters of the universe, or at least this galaxy or cluster of galaxies.

    • You are full of tradcon bullshit.

    • 1) Musk’s technocracy is not mutually exclusive to any social fix to feminism. It can be bolted on to anything.

      2) Elon Musk is a smart guy. I think it’s a mistake to assume that none among the super-rich have noticed that society is losing everything to feminism. Musk is likely to know people who have been fucked over in divorce court. He and his friends likely have male and female children, and they get to see those children grow up in a society that let’s the worst of female instincts run rampant over the male children. I don’t know when or if Musk will take the red pill, but if he’s still alive in 20 years, I think he’ll have at least considered our arguments against feminist social engineering, if he hasn’t already.

      The backlash has begun, gentlemen. I am excited to see what comes next. Let’s not alienate anyone, especially not Elon Musk, unless he shows anti-male colors.

      • Elon Musk has 5 sons. If something happens to one of them that could be his wakeup call when it comes to feminism.

        • Not just that, but Peter Thiel has spoken against misandry too. Peter Thiel is an old partner of Elon Musk.

      • Musk’s technocracy is not mutually exclusive to any social fix to feminism.

        I have the impression that most of the fixes to feminism will originate from technological progress. It will come to the point where it’s economically and physically impossible for feminists to continue their nonsense.

        Humanity has a strong biologically rooted tendency to favor women, which allows the FI to continue its influence, despite the huge inefficiencies and problems it creates. But the FI will eventually be overwhelmed by the continuous march of technology; it’s only a matter of time.

        I think it’s a mistake to assume that none among the super-rich have noticed that society is losing everything to feminism.

        Agreed; they didn’t get to their current position by being stupid.

        The backlash has begun, gentlemen. I am excited to see what comes next

        So am I. The next decade is going to bring some very interesting times.

  4. With Planets Like Mars (Hostile To Life) Then Women Would Avoid It Unless There Was Something To Entice Them There E.G. Mining Boom And Men Strike It Rich (Even So There Would Be A Large Disparity between Men And Women). Or No Choice E.G. Starvation On Earth.

    If The Planet Was To Be Terra-formed To Be Earth-Like Then Women Would Come In Droves And The Feminine Imperative Would Start Anew.

    Only A Planet That Is Not Conducive To Human Reproduction Will Allow A Society To Be Run For Men By Men, The Geekiest Guy Will Still Survive Better Than Most (If Not Nearly All) Women Would.

Leave a Comment. (Remember the comment policy is in force.)

Translate »
%d bloggers like this: