Feb 222014
 

One thing you hear people say a lot is that men (en masse) are becoming more feminine due to feminism and/or environmental factors.  I’m not convinced of this.  I have noticed that any example that is supposed to show that men en masse are becoming more feminine falls into one of two categories:

  1. Men aren’t doing what I want.  This includes everything from tradcons complaining that men aren’t getting married to women complaining that men aren’t bailing them out anymore to men have different political views than the complainer.
  2. Environmental factors such as lowered sperm counts, BPA, etc.

The problem with the environmental factors category is twofold.  First, you have to prove that it’s happening.  Second, you have to show that environmental factors are actually leading men en masse to act more feminine.  For example, consider lowered sperm counts.  The current research shows that lowered sperm counts are not happening.  It’s really the media creating panic.  Even if that wasn’t an issue, what are the examples given of men acting more feminine as a result of environmental factors?  They all fit into the first category of “men aren’t doing what I want”.  In other words, citing environmental factors as the cause of men is complaining that men aren’t doing what I want indirectly and hoping no one notices.

Can anyone come up with an objective example of men en masse becoming more feminine?  I don’t mean individual examples because those aren’t representative of most men.  Plus, a lot of those examples would be tied to a paycheck in some way.  Most men would never have the opportunity to “go feminine for pay”.  Plus, it ends as soon as the job ends.

Complaints about men en masse becoming more feminine are really self serving attempts to hide that the complainer is pissed that men aren’t slaving away for themselves or for women.  What is really happening is that men are looking at the dating landscape, the marriage landscape, the employment landscape, etc. and finding that there is no payoff.  Why get married if you will just get ass raped in divorce court?  Why bother dating if you can’t find a good woman?  Why bother going to college and wasting your money?  Why bother working more than the bare minimum you need unless you get paid highly for your time?  Why do a bunch of things tradcons, feminists, women in general, etc. want when they won’t provide you equal consideration or anything in return for your work?

What has happened is not that men have become more feminine.  What is happening is that men are making LOGICAL and RATIONAL decisions.  All complaints about men becoming more feminine seem to be in areas where men have discovered there is no payoff or the payoff doesn’t match the risk or work.  Men haven’t become more feminine.  Men simply aren’t being idiots.  Being able to make logical and rational decisions is something men do.  In other words, any complaint about men becoming more feminine is actually an example of men being masculine.  Given that enough men are making similar logical and rational decisions, it’s possible that men are now more masculine than ever before.  This means that feminism hasn’t feminized men but has had the opposite effect of making men more masculine.

  54 Responses to “Are Men Really Becoming More Feminine?”

  1. I think the vagina man will continue to flourish, as there is no shortage of fools who will let a cunt abuse them to get laid. Not me, women are bought by the pound.

  2. This is a very good point that has never occurred to me.

    Yes, all of that talk of low T might well be a coded form of male shaming.

    • Yes, all of that talk of low T might well be a coded form of male shaming.

      In the end the question of low T levels are for medical authorities. The problem is do studies actually say men have low T or is it media sensationalism? The answer is likely the latter, and that’s the case even if there’s some truth to a “low T problem”. I know someone will say that our great-grandfathers didn’t have low T, but do we really know that? Our great-grandfathers were too busy working in the fields or slaving away in factories to have the luxury of worrying about low T.

      I think there might be something to how all the talk of low T is coded male shaming. I have been thinking about what I call code lemon shaming language. It’s basically shaming language where the choices men make are medicalized. How many times have we seen accusations of aspergers syndrome used against men (especially when a lot of men and boys who are diagnosed with aspergers syndrome may have been diagnosed simply for being a normal man or boy)? Low T, low sperm counts, etc. may be used in the same way.

  3. Top post.

    This was particularly well expressed at SSM a while ago where there was a lot of hating on hipsters and calling them faggots.

    I found the whole episode blizzare but this post puts it into perspective, apparently making craft beers and generally doing whatever you like (anything not involving chasing trim) makes you effeminate and a faggot, go figure.

    If I knew hipsters and effeminate men were so loathed by feminists I would have taken to wearing bow ties and cardigans a long time ago, sadly it’s sexy steel cap boots and overalls for me.

    • This was particularly well expressed at SSM a while ago where there was a lot of hating on hipsters and calling them faggots.

      I found the whole episode blizzare but this post puts it into perspective, apparently making craft beers and generally doing whatever you like (anything not involving chasing trim) makes you effeminate and a faggot, go figure.

      If you want men to chase women more, increase the number of high quality women they have access to. Men will start chasing women more if there are women worth chasing. Otherwise, men are making the logical and rational decision to do something else.

      Think of this hipsters making craft beer as industrious men running a small business making a high quality product. When you think of it in those terms, it’s clearly pretty masculine.

      • The hyper masculine male is a man with the traits of the feminine. A true masculine man has self control and is humble. A hyper macho thug, is a pussy begging loud mouth. I have noticed women are loud and lack self control too. I think hyper macho thugs are men raised in a female dominated household and trained to be the white knight enforcers of women.

        Women hate faggots and weak men because they are not useful to them. Hyper macho thugs who call other men faggots are acting like women.

        women believe that men should chase them and provide for them. Women believe that they owe nothing in return and should be able to discard any man for any reason, even if that man has given everything to her. Hyper macho thugs believe men should chase women and sacrifice for them, they believe that women have the right to discard men, because discarded men are weak and not real men. Hyper macho thugs often use exactly the same bitch logic women use.

        • I kinda get ur logic, esp when it comes to women on their high horse, thinking they can have it all @ their own time. But I recently read somewhere something about it being unfair for a woman to discard a man for the “smallest/slightest” indiscretion. Well, being a woman, I recognize a man’s ingrained need to fuck…what I can’t, & will always fail to understand, is WHY, if he’s married to ME, not only am I supposed to be OK w/it, accept/forgive HIM/take him back, but this “small/slight” indiscretion, is EXPLAINED, AS “just being a man” or “it’s just sex”? Why is it NOT OK, then, 4 women/wives, to get even (not that I would…YOUR ASS’D JUST BE OUTTA THERE…THEN GET SERVED. PERIOD!)? If I sound BITTER, excuse me, but, YES, IT, HAS, HAPPENED, 2, ME…!

        • “But I recently read somewhere something about it being unfair for a woman to discard a man for the “smallest/slightest” indiscretion.”

          I personally wouldn’t care why a woman breaks up with a man, it can be for no reason.

          I am against the legal punishments inflicted on the man.

          Marriage is a criminal slavery contract for men, men should not get married to any woman full stop.

          Any woman who respects men would refused to put the man in that position.

  4. You site one study that states that BPA and other environmental Estrogens do not cause Feminization of males and hyper-feminization of females, without telling us who is paying for the study, and we are supposed to take it as fact? All we see are physically weak and feminine beta-males that allow women to cuckhold them, or are homosexual. There are many more articles that show what those chemicals do to the human body and they do affect the hormone production and utilization in the human body.

    Now, there are many men that have chosen not to get married and have just left society due to the reasons that you stated, which are valid and completely understandable, but to deny that we are being attacked in a form of chemical warfare is irresponsible on one end, or Criminal if being paid by those who are initiating that chemical warfare. Next you will tell us that GMO’s are perfectly safe and we should eat them everyday. No thanks. Men are supposed to Conan, not the sissy in a pajama onsie that is in desperate need of shots of Testosterone and an ass beating.

    Just 2 cents from a Neanderthal.

    • without telling us who is paying for the study, and we are supposed to take it as fact?

      Who is paying for the studies that say men are being chemically feminized? A lot of the studies you think say that men are being chemically feminized don’t say that. It’s nothing more than media sensationalism.

      All we see are physically weak and feminine beta-males that allow women to cuckhold them, or are homosexual.

      Maybe that’s all you see, but that’s not what I see. I see plenty of masculine men in control of their own lives. A lot of those supposed “feminine beta males” of yours aren’t. They’re trapped by anti-male legal system not chemically feminized.

      Men are supposed to Conan, not the sissy in a pajama onsie

      Most men aren’t pajama boy, but they have no interest in following you either. You’re whining that men aren’t doing what you want.

      • It is not women cuckolding men, it is women using the state to cuckold men. Do you think being masculine and manly enough will defend you from a women if she decides to use the state against you?

        You are applying hyper agency on to men, holding them responsible for things beyond their control, while not holding women responsible for using the state against men. You are basically using bitch logic, exactly the same sort of logic women use.

        A rational man will realise when the situation calls for withdrawal. A good commander knows when not to fight any battles. A hyper macho twit can be shamed into taking on responsibilities and battles that are not his own by being told to man up.

    • Jason wrote:
      to deny that we are being attacked in a form of chemical warfare is irresponsible on one end, or Criminal if being paid by those who are initiating that chemical warfare.

      Some people favor a balanced review of the evidence of ‘chemical warfare’ over wild accusations and conspiracy theory.

      Next you will tell us that GMO’s are perfectly safe and we should eat them everyday.

      Why wouldn’t they be?

      No thanks. Men are supposed to Conan,

      They’re supposed to be an unrealistic fictional character? Men who need a role model would do better to take a leaf out of the books of men such as Ben Franklin, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Thomas Edison, Donald Knuth, Tim Berners-Lee, Roald Amundsen, and Paul Erdos. They all had to overcome real-world obstacles to get things done, not slay monsters that don’t exist.

      not the sissy in a pajama onsie that is in desperate need of shots of Testosterone and an ass beating.

      Well, you never know about the onsie-clad sissy, he might be the numero uno WoW badass. I’m an admirer of all types of expertise in men.

      • As soon as the video said that sperm counts have dropped by half, I stopped watching because it was obviously bullshit. If they can’t get that right, nothing else they say is trustworthy. They’re doing nothing but spreading FUD (fear, uncertainty, and doubt).

        As has been pointed out athletic records keep getting broken which would be impossible if testosterone was dropping so this video has no evidence to contribute.

        • Its more likely you will have to investigate each and every claim of theirs. How do you know that if they got one thing wrong they got everything else wrong?

          Neither they nor you may get everything right. Just because you have one wrong idea doesn’t invalidate every other idea they or you have.

          Except it follows that logically the the idea that is wrong is the premise with which other ideas are based.

        • How do you know that if they got one thing wrong they got everything else wrong?

          Because it directly affects their central thesis. It’s not some peripheral piece of data. Also, they completely failed to explain observed facts like men continually breaking athletic records which would be impossible if men were suffering from low T. Also, I’m sure they didn’t actually show that any of this actually led to objectively less masculine behavior as opposed to causing other problems.

      • And yet athletic records continue to be broken so until they can explain that they have nothing.

        • Toestosterone declines dont mean a thing, men generate ridiculous high amounts of toestesterone

          Men have huge amounts of toestosterone, even a 5% decline doesnt even effect most men

          Even the malfunction of toest generators such as the prostate gland, which causes cancer, has negligble effect on a mans toest levels

          Men create ridiculous amounts of toestosterone in excess where even decline’s in their environment, such as oestrogen in the drinking water, doesnt even dent the levels in the average man

          Even gays & tran’s, have the same biological sex drives as a regular guy …

          When you have even gays, who have maladjusted levels of pre-natal female hormones, still as insanely horny if not more … as the average male

          Speaks volumes just how much toest the average male generates

          Men create too much toest to be effected by any bullshit decline these researchers come up with …

          As I stated before, mangina’s are allowed to behave feminine, thats whats causing the appearance of men being more effeminate

          Men are biologically hard wired to be masculine,

          You can douse men with oestrogen & bullshit sex change operations & they’ll still be high toest horny masculine men

          ALL sex change operations are a SCAM, they dont work …

          As men are hard-wired to be masculine

          You cant change a mans biology by changing one hormone, or slicing his penis off

          This is WHY gay men & trannies are mentally insane & should be locked up in a mental asylum

          All gay men are essentially mentally ill retards …

          Just like the researcher who thinks declining toest levels correlate’s with men behaving effeminately like a woman

          It’s a fake correlation of fake proportions …

          The LGBT movement is the biggest bullshit indoctrination cult , next to feminism

          Being gay or an even worse, a trannie moron is a cult, its a brainwashing cult

          Being gay is a modern day, politicised cult, designed to attract mentally ill idiots …

          Being gay is a cult

          You cant feminise men, you can however brainwash or train men to BEHAVE femininised, HUGE DIFFERENCE

          lol I dont think PMAFT’s realised the can of whoop ass he’s opened here

  5. I think this is an excellent article. However, there is an example I wish to provide of males being more effeminate. Emo culture. An entire generation of boys imitating girls, gays, and bordering on being trans. They catch phrase of “except me for who I am” and “emo-phobia” really hints that emo culture is a desire, an envy, of the LGBT. They want to feel like persecuted minorities, so they act like chicks, boarder on being trans, and proclaim society’s lack of excepting them is some sort of bigotry. I don’t know if this is the result of feminism. I see it more as the result of a cultural marxist white-guilt, straight-guilt, cis-guilt, male-guilt, minorities first culture. There is no status higher or more sought after than the victim status. Being a victim is the new trend. In the same way that artificial displays of wealth, now we have artificial displays of victimhood. But I do think our culture is less masculine than it once was, but maybe I’m wrong. I didn’t grow up in the 1940’s to watch the social evolution of many generations.

    • Emo culture. An entire generation of boys imitating girls, gays, and bordering on being trans.

      I see the point you’re getting at, but emo is a fad that more or less died out a few years ago. A marginal subculture like that was never widespread among men (or boys) so it’s not an example of the feminization of men en masse.

      But I do think our culture is less masculine than it once was, but maybe I’m wrong.

      I don’t dispute this, but this is a reason why we see MGTOW/MOO (men opting out) and similar things going on. The culture is more feminized but men are rejecting it. Thus, this is an example not of men being feminized, but of men rejecting feminization.

      • @PMAFT

        I would dispute it

        Your culture is not as masculine in behaviour only, biologically men are still horny & masculine as they’ve always been

        They’re only using feminised behaviour to get laid, it’ll change once they realise they cant get chicks, months of porn & rejections from hot women wakes most men up …

        Notice how most mangina’s have low i.q, they cant even figure out why women cant stand them … so they double down even more

        I’m pretty sure its a low i.q issue, not a societal issue

        Society encourages low i.q behaviour such as liberalism & hysterical cults such as feminism

        Most high i.q men are anything but liberal, except in appearance to appease the low i.q victimised women they want to fuck

        One of the drawbacks of having trophy hot women in your rotation …

    • I respect the Hell out of you RBK, but I wish you would let go of your hang ups over cultural Marxism. To blame emo culture of Cultural Marxism is stupid.

  6. this is another issue for younger males, which will ultimately make them hate women even more.

  7. Men are becoming more feminine as they do whatever it takes to please the women. They are yes-men who cannot say no to their wishes.

    Think of this phrase “happy wife, happy life” and that says it all. Men will do whatever it takes to either get laid, or keep their wife happy. If that includes putting down the toilet seat then they will.

    There’s lack of leadership and decisions. The dates are now the guy sheepishly saying “ummmm so what do you want to do?” catering to her wishes. Forking up the bill.

  8. Can anyone come up with an objective example of men en masse becoming more feminine?

    OK, my theory on this is that men ARE becoming what seems like feminizing, but in fact it is actually both men and women who are being changed, not just men. And they are being changed not so much by feminists, but by homosexual men ( who rule and reign in the fashion industry). Let me give you a wholesale example:

    Men are now expected to look like post pubescent boys, and women are now supposed to look like prepubescent boys.

    Men: Short croppped hair, close shaven face, all body hair to be “manscaped”, metrosexual ( ie; looks like a pospubescent boy for the joy of homosexuals)

    Women: Short hair, pants and shirt, minimal makeup, brazillians, no body hair whatsoever ( ie to look like a prepubescant boy for the joy of homosexuals)

    So this works great for feminists; but it is not the feminists themselves that are the impetus behind it.

    What is the solution? Look at age old tried and tested masculinity and femininity!

    Men: Hair grown between the shoulders and middle of the back, full untrimmed beard, untrimmed body hair, moderate clothing

    Women: Hair grown all the way or no shorter than the middle of the back, dresses not pants, no need for huge amount of hair removal because it is covered up, moderate clothing and no makeup needed.

    • Interesting point, but behaviour doesnt lead to biological chemistry

      It’s a ridiculous notion

      Dressing like a pussified moron, doesnt change hard wired biology, hence women divorcing like crazed whackjob lemmings …

      Behaviour cant change biology

      Yes, most men are basically mimicing what they’re told will get them laid by the mass media

      But it doesnt make them feminine, theyre only mimicing feminine behaviour

      Theyre still hard-wired to be masculine & men

      In short men are being lied as to what gets them laid, this is why we have the current feminised appearance of men in society

      Yes, its irritating men behaving like pussified fucks, it’ll only last until the liberal & feminist groups are starved & deprived by the massive increasing global marriage strike, ie the bubble

      In the meantime get your kids to act & dress & have masculine haircuts, train them with masculine behaviour & you’ll single handedly raise incredible boys

  9. Depends what you mean by feminine. Work and marriage aside, I’ve personally noticed that Western guys, particularly white ones, are more likely to speak with an irritating teenage girl tonation, complain about “unfairness” or hurt feelings, care more about their appearance, engage in sarcastic gossip etc. than guys I’ve met in poorer countries. Take that as you will, but I don’t think this is an improvement on “traditional” masculinity. In fact, I’d say this attitude is the source of the West’s political problems.

  10. PMAFT & others make crucial points, all men have to take notice of …

    The low sperm counts & low toesterone, even though men have 1800% 18x more toest then women, are all cover ups of women’s infertility & shaming men for refusing to marry sluts & going MGTOW

    Women are insanely shit at reproducing, due to their shitty diets & poor impulse control & refusal to work, giving most women highly compromised immune systems

    It’s typical propoganda

    The fact is, as someone else pointed out, its the pagan christians like Dalrock Vox Day Sunshine Mary etc, liberal egalatarian mangina’s doubling down & behaving even more obviously feminine to try & get laid, then they normally would in previous decades

    Mangina’s are PERMITTED to behave flagarantly feminine, THATS whats causing society to look as if its become more feminine

    Most men are MGTOW, or the odd bluepill man goes postal & kills the odd woman

    Men have been masculine & warrior caste’s for millions of years, no amount of brainwashing changes the hard-wiring of a man

    It’s all propoganda

    The propoganda IS THE HYSTERIA theyre trying to create by stating men are becoming more feminised

    The HYSTERIA is the propoganda

    Just remain calm & give the mangina’s & white knights & social engineers the finger

    That’s basically what PMAFT is stating in this post, for those who dont get it …

    • “Dalrock Vox Day Sunshine Mary etc, liberal egalatarian mangina’s doubling down & behaving even more obviously feminine to try & get laid, then they normally would in previous decades”

      Evidence? I am sure the game helped ensure their entrance to authentic masculinity?

      • Dalrock has plenty of evidence lol, just look at his blog …

        His constant watering down & toning down of articles, so MRA’s & MGTOW dont comment on his blog

        He’s known for banning & deleting comments from MRA’s, PUA’s & gamers

        Also he’s on record for stating, he doesnt want hard hitting comments by MRA’s or MGTOW as theyre not the audience he writes for

        Plus he thinks cops aren’t rabid male hating pricks …

        Vox Day’s on record for stating men should marry reformed sluts, & then shoots off some inane jesus speak

        Even though the bible states fornication is a sin …

        So WHY is Vox Day a freaking christian, telling men to marry reformed sluts in the name of jesus … ARE YOU FREAKING KIDDING ME … WTF

        Keoni Galt’s ridiculously blue pill blog roll, should be a huge red flag on his doubling down as an egalatarian mangina

        He’s got everyone from insane pussified mangina’s such as Dr Illusion, to Sunshine Mary & Susan Walsh on his blog roll

        Then there’s W.F Price & his man dying from terminal cancer, buying a diseased single mother shoe’s & handbags as he dies as noble …

        Its impossible for a married man like Dalrock or Keoni Galt to be red pill

        They can recognise or practise the red pill, but they’ll never be able to internalise game, or the red pill, hell even masculinity

        As marriage is the ultimate blue pill

        Plus these guys’ve spent most of their lives being blue pill soccer dads …

        I’ve personally stopped reading their blogs, as I’m sick of their pussified blue pill soccer dad, drivel

        I really only read MGTOW or MRA blogs now, & game or PUA blogs, in addition to my research

        I’m sick of soccer dad’s such as Dalrock & W.F Price, ruining the manosphere, with their pussified mangina horseshit …

  11. I’ve also come across claims in the ‘sphere about dropping sperm counts, and it always seemed odd. Did they actually measure average sperm counts anywhere in the world 50 or 100 years ago? “Please jack off into this cup, dear Sir. Have no worries, it’s strictly for medical research”. Yeah right. It seems bogus.

    It’s not just angry women propagating this trope about men getting feminized, it’s also tradcons, as usual. In fact, the whole issue seems like typical tradcon nonsense. That post of SSM about hipsters is a typical example. Tradcons never change. “I was a manly man when I was young, but nowadays young guys are just pussies”. Cool story, bro.

    The simple fact is this: men aren’t becoming hypergamous or solipsistic. They aren’t developing interest in any stuff that normally girls are interested in – they aren’t watching soap operas or shitty romantic comedies. They aren’t behaving as a herd. There’s no evidence of any of this happening on a wide scale anywhere.

    • Whether it’s the feminists, the tradcons, or anyone else, it’s all about the same thing. Men aren’t doing what they want. That is what this is all about.

    • Trad cons are just as full of shit as left wing liberals. Trad cons believe in a manly masculine past that rewarded manly men, this is pure fantasy. Manly men where cannon fodder for the machine.

      A real masculine man will not be manipulated into being a mangina, slave for a female. Masculinity is about being rational and having self control. If Most trad cons don’t understand cause and effect and they blame societies decline on men not being manly enough. Society is being destroyed by women and a dysfunctional single mother culture.

      • A real masculine man will not be manipulated into being a mangina, slave for a female. Masculinity is about being rational and having self control.

        In this sense we are living in an age where more and more men are becoming hypermasculine as defined by real masculinity (and not by artificial machnoness or other stereotypes).

        • Actually its marriage destroying society, not women or single mothers

          Single mothers only comprise about 20%

          While married men & women comprise over 50% of the population

          Its the married couple who funds the feminists & single mothers

          Marriage is responsible for pretty much everything fucked up in our society

          Which is why the marriage strike is probably the most devestating tool for dismantling feminism

  12. To the author, I have this to say…

    Go visit a high school in your area. You will see a significant number of boys that are not gay, but display more feminine behavior than the girls around them. On the flip side, you will also see a lot of girls for which the word feminine does not really apply.

    I can just about see a complete role reversal happening within the next three generations. Girls will be more bulky and will display male behaviors while boys will be shopping and dressing nice and being feminine.

    It’s not happening in the adult generation, it’s happening in the next generation.

    And it is not something to be alarmed about – it is a symptom of mankind throwing off societal mores and doing what they want to do based on reality.

    • Rodney Barbati wrote:
      You will see a significant number of boys that are not gay, but display more feminine behavior than the girls around them.

      In the last high school I visited, the girls dressed like skanks and 99% of the guys wore something like jeans and a sweatshirt. It’s probably not that different from a generation ago, except for the specific fashions. Oh yeah, there are more fatties now.

      I can just about see a complete role reversal happening within the next three generations.

      Guys don’t want to mate with warpigs. If that’s all there is they’ll just fap off to VR porn or use sexbots when they become widely available. Then they won’t have to deal with weight gain, excessive temperament, or body odor in order to get laid.

      Girls will be more bulky

      That’s the obesity epidemic for you. Trust me, it is not a new standard of attractiveness.

      and will display male behaviors

      Girls only display male behavior when there isn’t any cost for doing so. So they’ll ooze grrl power all over the place until there’s an emergency and then they’ll run scurrying back into the arms of men for protection. They’ll also be outraged by any male failure to do so.

      And it is not something to be alarmed about

      No, it’s not, because what you’re saying is horseshit. Human behavior isn’t nearly as malleable as you seem to think it is, especially not sexually dimorphic behavior.

      • Wow. You know, when you think you are that correct, you are almost certainly wrong. As I said, go check out a high school. I didn’t say imagine a high school or create a mental simulation of a high school in your mind. Go! Go to a high school, then come back and apologize.

        • Rodney Barbati:
          Go! Go to a high school, then come back and apologize.

          What am I supposed to apologize about? That your goofball sexual role reversal fantasies don’t exist in the real world?

          Men are men, and women are women. Get over it.

  13. In academia and the tech industry, the emphasis on psychology/communication and not on code/logic levels the playing field for women. This is detrimental
    to the actual techie who has to be considered a lesser human being, not good with people etc. However another group flourishes : the two faced psychopath or
    workplace bully. He has the paradoxical personality characteristics that suit the modern female : He matches the amount of sadism the modern woman displays and
    knows how to hide it by acting as a respectable house father. Such a person matches the modern female perfectly.
    The effect of feminism on those social environments is the prevalence of such couplings : The narcissistic psychopathic female and her two-faced psychopath
    boyfriend/husband. Because of this I think the workplace mobbing epidemic in academia and the tech industry is a consequence of feminism.
    So feminism doesn’t cause the feminization of men but causes the wrong type of man to be in power : The two-faced psychopath coward bully idiot.
    It’s the stupid female empowering the stupid man, who paradoxically acts like the worst ‘patriarchy’ had to offer : The Dictator.
    This is another case of feminism having an adverse effect, contrary to their original intention, if they had any.

  14. Feminism and TradCons siittin’ in a tree………..

    I am a socialist and am against Feminism as all Socialists were before 1940. Both are savages killing the human spirit.

  15. Hmmm. I disagree, though it’s possible, at least in part. I do see an increase in straight guys having slightly more effeminate undertones vocally and in demeanor, and it seems to be more in the under-30 age range.

    But my first thought was that it has to do with the increasing number of gay men coming out in the last decade or two, and being more in the public eye, whether on YouTube, in film and TV, in the news, on talk shows, etc.

    Like when you live with someone you subconsciously pick up some of their mannerisms or catchphrases from mere exposure to them.

    It’s the same phenomenon that causes people to adapt to behaviors and lifestyles pushed on the public by politicians and the entertainment industry, as well as use slang and overused references such as “24/7”, “amazing”, bling bling, and most recently, “magical”.

    Most people are easily affected/influenced/brainwashed.

    (or maybe there are just more gay men pretending to be straight)

  16. Men have so much toestosterone, over 18x thats 1800% more toestosterone then women, its almost impossible for men to be low in toest

    Same goes for low sperm counts, men make over a million sperm a day

    Low sperm counts & low toest are all ways docters use to cover up the infertility & useless barren wombs of ameriskanks, so they dont get sued by batshit women

  17. Coal Ash does have a role in reducing Test, as does consistently taking hot showers.

    I have long proposed environmentalism as a tool of masculine aggression.

Leave a Comment. (Remember the comment policy is in force.)

Translate »
%d bloggers like this: