Mar 062013
 

On Jezebel, noted mangina, Hugo Schwyzer, is promoting pegging, which is a sexual act where a woman wearing a strap on fucks a man up his ass.  Hugo Schwyzer considers this a great way to turn men feminist.  The commenters on that piece mostly agree and apparently engage in pegging quite regularly.  Do hetero people really want to engage in pegging?  Obviously the answer is no except for ideological (i.e. feminist) reasons.  It would not be an enjoyable act for either a hetero man or a hetero woman.  Unless your girlfriend or boyfriend is questioning his/her sexuality or considers himself/herself a feminist, then you are never going to get a request to engage in pegging.

Since most women have no interest in pegging men, then what is the problem?  The problem is similar to the Susan Walsh line of, “I’m not a feminist because I’m against sluts/have no interest in being a slut.”  The average woman is going to look at feminists talking about pegging and think their nuts.  This sounds like a good thing except that it give the average woman cover for her own misandry because clearly she “can’t be a feminist” because she isn’t interested in unusual sex acts like pegging.  The average “not a feminist” woman will still be a misandrist and do things like use the feminist anti-family court system to divorce her husband all the while considering herself different from the feminists in the same way that Susan Walsh thinks that she is “not a feminist”.

What is happening with feminists and pegging is that what gets called “feminist” becomes a smaller and smaller subset of true misandry as feminism requires more and more obscure ideas and practices for someone to consider themselves a feminist.  This creates a problem where it becomes easier for women and manginas can be both “anti-feminist” (although they would be AFINOs, anti-feminist in name only) and misandrist at the same time.

  22 Responses to “The Problem With Feminists And Pegging”

  1. I always thought the problem with feminists is that they were cunts and the problem with pegging is that if nature intended for women to fuck me up the ass, they wouldn’t need a plastic cock to do it with.

  2. Lol,I know. I’m just playing dumb for shits and giggles,doing kind of a Borat routine.

    In all seriousness,though, how many of these mangina doughboys do you think want Obamacare because they have prolapsed assholes from all the butt-pounding?

    And for bonus points, from a psychological standpoint, what do you think it is that motivates a man to take a strap-on up his ass from a woman rather than cutting out the middle (wo)man and letting Bubba love him up the way he obviously enjoys the most?

    • These manginas definitely want Obamacare to deal with their prolapsed anuses. I would not be surprised to find out that private insurance does not cover damage from repeated poundings up the ass due to a strap on. Regular anal sex with a penis probably doesn’t cause the medical problems that pegging does.

      As for why a guy would do this, I can only come up with two reasons, ideology (i.e. to show a feminist a guy is) or homophobia (when it comes to gay men). I noticed from the comments at Jezebel that they talked about how they know “straight” guys that love this. Obviously, they aren’t straight so why not encourage them to get in touch with their true sexual orientation instead? If they’re gay, then let them be gay. Instead they’re trying to convince these guys that they’re straight. I think it’s a latent homophobia (against gay men) among feminists since gay sex to them is anti-woman at a visceral level.

  3. PMAFT, about pegging:
    Hugo Schwyzer considers this a great way to turn men feminist.

    Hugo Schwyzer, enlightened feminist that he is, has by his own admission committed the following heinous acts:

    1. Attempted murder. Years ago, he tried to kill his girlfriend and himself.
    2. Sleeping with his female students.
    3. Cuckolding a man and conspiring with the mother of his child to hide the fact.

    In a truly just society, he would be behind bars, not spewing propaganda for a ladies’ rag.

    The commenters on that piece mostly agree and apparently engage in pegging quite regularly.

    I suppose their daddies never taught them that trying to make catchers out of pitchers is not such a great idea. Hugo, manipulative shyster that he is, can of course continue to extoll the benefits of pegging while he’s putting the make on his female students. But I doubt any of them ever wore a strap-on while he was in bed with them.

    What is happening with feminists and pegging is that what gets called “feminist” becomes a smaller and smaller subset of true misandry as feminism requires more and more obscure ideas and practices for someone to consider themselves a feminist.

    That’s a fair point, even though the idea of “pegging” fits in with the feminist/misandrist m.o. of trying to manipulate men into serving women, but at the same time removing any pride men have in themselves as men.

    • No, in a true society he would be lying in a ditch trying to stuff his intestines back into his body while the desert heat slowly bakes him.

  4. Y’know, I’d like to know Sheryl Sandberg’s opinion on this, since she’s now the go to feminist.

  5. Quick note:

    1) “Pegging” would stimulate the prostate gland which I understand is “pleasurable”. Having never tried it I cannot confirm, but if there is a correlation between prostate manipulation and pleasure, “pegging” would make sense.

    2) Point one made, I seriously think that “Hugo” is gay or bisexual. In my experience, feminists tend to gravitate to that type of male.

  6. The vagina is much more receptive and flexible to penetration than the anus anyway, what a pointless comparison.

  7. As someone who implements kink into my personal sex life, and also as someone who is a professional Dominatrix, pegging is not necessarily a feminist act.
    First of all, receiving anal sex does not make a man gay. A lot of straight men enjoy anal stimulation of different kinds ranging from a small plug to strap-on sex, because it stimulates the prostate gland and feels good (*shocker, I know!*)
    Second of all, there is nothing wrong for a woman to insist that her partner experience a certain sex act that might be painful and unpleasant for her first, before doing it to her. In kink circles, most Dominants (men and women) won’t inflict a type of pain on a sub that they themselves can’t withstand.

    Being a good sexual partner means exploring your own limits if you want to push your partners with things like anal sex.

    • That makes no sense. That’s like saying if a man wants to have vaginal sex with a woman he must be willing to wear a strap on vagina (if such a thing exists) while he gets fucked by his woman wearing a strap on. At that point they really aren’t even having sex with each other.

      Not everything can be reversed. Live with it.

  8. While I understand the arguments made about stimulating the prostate and the argument about pegging being about fetish, this whole argument takes androgyny to ridiculous levels and honestly exposes a latent penis-envy amongst at least certain groups of feminists.

    Of course after reading what the femitheist has advocated for, nothing feminists say shocks me anymore.

  9. One other thing that’s struck me after a good night’s sleep and that is how this is evidence that traditionalists are far closer to feminists and ultimately just as much an enemy of men’s rights.

    I’m reminded of the Roman view of homosexuality, which the whole linking of pegging and feminism blatantly parallels.

    In Roman society, male homosexuality was conditionally accepted and conditionally rejected.

    See in Roman society, homosexuality was only frowned on if you were “the woman” during anal sex.

    What such a move is an attempt to do, is radically androgynise society, however it gets even better. Such a move seeks to do so by embracing the traditionalist, dogmatic and misandrist myth that a penis, particularly during sex, makes someone a perpetual superman. This is the paradigm of traditional masculinity at its most fundamental, merely manipulated by feminists to the advantage of female supremacists – like so much of feminist doctrine.

    PMAFT, you’ve claimed that this move shrinks further and further what it means to be a feminist, however it also exposes more blatantly, how rooted in trraditionalism feminism is and how despite claims to the contrary by both groups, feminists and traditionalists ultimately operate from the same paradigm and truly deserve each other.

    Hopefully as moves like this continue, people will realise that it is traditionalism rather than feminism that is the head of the snake, and that feminism is nothing more than a leeching symbiote latched onto the side of the figurative snake’s head. I say symbiote as opposed to parasite, because the white knight guardians of traditionalism have been more than willing to allow feminism to gain the foothold that it has in Western society.

  10. Women are made to be on the receiving end, men are not, and I bet Hugo Schwyzer would never let a woman fuck him in the ass.

  11. Hugo is unable to understand that my promoting pegging he is actually saying that vagina is inferior than penis and the women who indulge in pegging also seem to have a vagina complex… they aren’t proud of being a female and having a vagina which makes Hugo the biggest anti-feminist indirectly… it’s really sad and Hugo is too blunt to notice that… sex is not a buisness, shouldn’t be done to prove something to anybody… it’s beautiful, it is natural… we respect woman and vagina and don’t need to prove it.

  12. Why is pegging receiving so much attention, I fail to understand ?

    Pegging is homosexuality, clear and simple. Nothing else. Why are people so bothered with it ?

    What is Homosexuality ?

    Homosexuality is the act of sex between two individuals HAVING AN IDENTICAL PAIR OF SEXUAL ORGANS.

    In Pegging, BOTH PARTNERS HAVE A PENIS. That is an identical pair of sex organs. WHAT ELSE CAN IT BE OTHER THAN HOMOSEXUALITY ?

    FAQ :
    ===========

    Some may say that Homosexuality is the sex between a man and another man or between a woman and another woman.

    That brings up the question : What is a man ? And what is a woman ?

    Some may say that a man is the one who has the penis and the woman is the one who has the vagina.

    Then by this definition, in pegging, BOTH PARTNERS HAVE A PENIS. Therefore, technically BOTH PARTNERS ARE MEN. AND SEX BETWEEN TWO MEN IS NOTHING BUT HOMOSEXUALITY.

    Some others may say that a man is the one who has a XY genetic constitution and the woman is the one who has a XX genetic constitution.

    But that’s not correct. In today’s world there are many TRANSSEXUAL MEN AND WOMEN TOO. That is, men and women, who were once individuals of the opposite gender, but now have changed their physiologies to bring them in line with their minds, but their GENETIC CONSTITUTION IS STILL UNCHANGED from their previous gender. THE TRANSSEXUAL MAN STILL RETAINS HIS XX GENETIC MAKEUP from his erstwhile female persona, while the TRANSSEXUAL WOMAN STILL RETAINS HER XY GENETIC MAKEUP from her previous male existence.

    And the LAW permits them their new existence in their new gender, WITHOUT even the mention of the word TRANSSEXUAL, even though they still carry the GENETIC MAKEUP OF THEIR EARLIER OPPOSITE GENDER.

    Then, saying that men are the ones that carry the XY genetic makeup and women the XX, does not stand the test of Law, and is a CLEAR CASE OF DISCRIMINATION AGAINST TRANSSEXUAL MEN AND WOMEN, who actually carry the opposite genetic makeup (XX for Men, and XY for Women).

    THEREFORE, in today’s world, it is impossible to infer homosexuality or heterosexuality solely from the gender of the partners. IT MUST THEN BE DEFINED BY THE PRESENCE OF IDENTICALITY OR DIFFERENCE IN SEXUAL ORGANS.

    IF BOTH PARTNERS HAVE AT LEAST ONE PAIR OF IDENTICAL SEXUAL ORGANS, IT IS HOMOSEXUALITY.

    HETEROSEXUALITY WILL OCCUR ONLY WHEN THE PARTNERS HAVE NO (ZERO) IDENTICAL PAIR OF SEXUAL ORGANS.

    AND THEREFORE, IN PEGGING, BOTH PARTNERS HAVE AN IDENTICAL PAIR OF SEXUAL ORGANS – THE PENIS. AND THEREFORE, PEGGING IS HOMOSEXUALITY.

    AND TRYING TO DENY THAT IS PURE HOMOPHOBIA.

    • Chris, by your own analysis, your response both is flawed and an insult to the gay and transgender communities, no matter how much you try and scream it by typing all in caps.

      Firstly, there is your failed defintion of homosexuality. Homosexuality is actually the attraction between 2 people of the same gender, rather than the same sexual organs. Ergo, it is possible, though complex, to have a homosexual relationship between an unaltered transgender man (ie biologically female, but with a male gender identity) and a cisgendered man. In that situation, only one man has a penis (ie both individuals have dissimilar sexual organs), however it is still a homosexual relationship. In fact, I strongly suspect that any homosexual, transgender man would be highly insulted at your pigeon-holing their sexuality for the sake of political expediency.

      Secondly, a strip-on and a dildo will never be a sexual organ, any more than a fleshlight is a sexual-organ. Devices such as these have no inherent reproductive functions and are therefore incapable of being sexual organs as a result. What these devices are, are sexual aids, or sex toys, designed specifically to enhance sexual pleasure. Ergo your entire argument about sex toys being sexual organs is pure nonsense.

      Therefore your argument about pegging and homosexuality fails to make a compelling argument on those grounds and is an insult to the LBGT community.

      Furthermore, there is the arguments of feminists themselves. The feminist proponents of pegging have zero interest in unaltered transgendered homosexual men experiencing the same sexual experiences of cisgendered homosexual men. The article makes it abundantly clear that the feminist movement is advocating for pegging in heterosexual, cisgendered relationships. Furthermore the article makes it clear that this advocacy is specifically framed around the premise of “penis=sexual power;vagina=sexual powerlessness – therefore cisgendered homosexual women sodomising cisgendered, heterosexual men, allows cisgendered, heterosexual men to experience female powerlessness, therefore gaining empathy for the oppression of women and becoming sympathetic to feminism.” Nothing in that premise even remotely has anything to do with issues facing LGBT individuals.

      In short, your entire argument is pure, unintelligent driven and your exploitation of the LGBT community for your own political ends, is utterly vile and reprehensible.

      • bowspearer,

        I had no intention of saying anything against the LGBT community when I wrote this. In fact, my entire idea behind this was to show and expose the pretense feminists put up when they try to promote pegging by hook or crook (albeit, in a slightly cutting tone). But if this has in any way come across as denigrating or hurtful to the feelings of the LGBT community, I first need to apologise.

        I am no politician, I am a simple everyday man, and I tried to best put what I felt in my simple English. I have no political meals to cook, but if it has come across as such, I need to apologise again.

        Allow me to share why I really wrote this up.

        To answer this completely, I need to revisit the topic of homosexuality. Yes, you’re right, and I completely agree with you when you say that “Homosexuality is actually the attraction between 2 people of the same gender, rather than the same sexual organs”. But that is Homosexual Behavior. What I was talking about was the ACT of homosexuality, that is, when homosexuality is involved in a certain sexual act.

        You state the basic feminist ideology behind pegging very correctly – “penis=sexual power;vagina=sexual powerlessness – therefore cisgendered homosexual women sodomising cisgendered, heterosexual men, allows cisgendered, heterosexual men to experience female powerlessness, therefore gaining empathy for the oppression of women……”

        But across the web feminists (or God knows what) aren’t limited to promoting pegging with this basic ideology. Instead there are now representations that show men enjoying and begging for pegging. Instead of “sharing the female powerlessness”, pegging is now being promoted as the “ultimate male pleasure”, and what not. Do you now realize where this comes ? It is a 180 degree turnaround. It isn’t sticking to one single ideology any more. It is now about “whatever sells”, about “off with all principles”, and about “grab them somehow, anyhow”.

        This was one of the things I was trying to write against. Another was the silent homophobia. I do not know whether you’d agree, but the way I look at it, when a man is looking for a woman to insert a penis into him, it is actually a latent, disguised homosexuality (Heterosexuals would never want a rod in their bum, would they ? 36% of homosexual men ever have anal sex in their lives, but Zero percent of heterosexuals do. Therefore anything in the rear of a man would definitely be looked at as homosexual. Once more, this is not to deride or denigrate homosexuals, this is only to state the facts). But the way pegging is being bawled about across the net, these feminists loudly try to deny this and then try to establish the idea of pegging as a heterosexual activity. To me, if you’re homosexual, be homosexual, and I have no problems with that. But if you are indulging in homosexual pleasures, but denying it to be homosexuality, and trying to pass it off as heterosexuality, isn’t that insulting both the homosexual and heterosexual communities ? Isn’t that latent homophobia ? And misinformation on purpose ?

        This is a feminist pretense that is going largely unnoticed. And this is what I wanted to write against.

        And I can understand why this went down so seemingly wrong. That is because I was writing in a satirical vein here. Go through it once more, and you should be able to connect. I perfectly know that a “strip-on and a dildo will never be a sexual organ”. I perfectly know that “devices such as these have no inherent reproductive functions and are therefore incapable of being sexual organs as a result”. I perfectly know “these devices are, are sexual aids, or sex toys, designed specifically to enhance sexual pleasure”.

        And I perfectly Know “Ergo your entire argument about sex toys being sexual organs is pure nonsense”. Yes, it is nonsense. Because it was meant to be nonsense. Because it was purely meant to be a piece of satire.

        It was purely meant to be a nonsense answer to the feminist nonsense propaganda that pegging “allows cisgendered, heterosexual men to experience female powerlessness.”

        I hope I have been able to make myself clear. I also hope you’re now able to see through the smirk I wrote.

        Before I end, I’d once more like to confirm that I’m no politician – I’m just an average joe on the street. Yeah, I do have a funny bone somewhere that sometimes likes to take shots at social cacophonies.

        If you have any more questions, please let me know. I’ll be happy to answer.

        Warm Wishes,

        Chris.

        • Or maybe I put it better this way –

          If the feminist propaganda that pegging “allows cisgendered, heterosexual men to experience female powerlessness” is nonsense, this is nonsense too.

          Otherwise, this is complete sense.

  13. inb4 someone points out the username…

    pegging sounds retarded, but i do like a bit of prostate massaging from time to time. it goes well with weed. I’m straight, but every once in a while it really hits the spot.

  14. Pegging is more degrading to women than men,there’s no physical pleasure for woman and she just serves the man! Yeah that’s right men were always jealous about female multiple whole body orgasm now they are getting it without being degraded as the woman is not using the man for her own pleasure like men do in anal sex with women and see them as objects and like the domination in it.yeah pegging is not the same level as anal sex although men get alot of pleasure while most women don’t get any pleasure from their anal being penerated.

    • This. Finally someone made the point that pegging is not degrading to men because most men who engage in the act BEG and PRESSURE their female partners into performing the act. If anything pegging is on the opposite end of feminism and rather evolved patriarchy because it is a woman giving a man an orgasm and feeling nothing in return. Combine this fact with the truth that men get addicted to this fetish and stop even wanting PIV and again, the man gets what he wants and the woman is degraded to wearing a plastic dick with no sensation.

Leave a Comment. (Remember the comment policy is in force.)

Translate »
%d bloggers like this: