Mar 132013
 

Now that Anita Sarkeesian has released her first video attacking video games, here are two videos criticizing her:

The videos are from last year, but they are still relevant.  The second video shows that Sarkeesian manufactured being a victim of misogyny by deleting her two previous videos before announcing her series on video games. What happened was that a lot of people were angry at her for deleting those two videos, and they made their feelings known in the comments for the next video which happened to be the video about her video game series.  Sarkessian used everyone that was angry at her about an unrelated topic to whine, “HELP, HELP!!!!  I’m the victim of an organized attacked by misogynists.”  In reality lots of people were legitimately angry at her for a wide variety of reasons.  This was intentional fraud on her part.  Things like this are why these videos are very helpful in revealing that Sarkessian is a charlatan.

  12 Responses to “Anita Sarkeesian”

  1. Honestly, this is where the manosphere has a massive blind spot. Let’s suppose for a minute that she’s right and videogames do make men more violent. Isn’t that precisely what society wants us to be, perpetual, expendable protectors? Therefore doesn’t that merely represent glaring evidence of society’s brutal socailisation of men starting from the age when we’re young boys?

    Honestly all too often I hear knee jerk responses whenever someone says a feminist has a point (which shouldn’t be a surprise – the most convincing lies are all based sufficiently in truth to make their deception convincing), however that simply let’s them control the terms of the debate, which in turn let’s them “control the game”.

    Take sexual objectification for example. We minimise it or dismiss it as feminist scaremongering, but when to we stop, flip it around and rightly accuse society and women of sexually objectifying men every single time they say “I want a real man” or in addition, child grooming when men and women tell little boys to “be a man” (in other words “only value yourself in terms of the ability to provide, ability to protect and sexual prowess – oh not only is all sex you have automatically consensual because you have a penis, but if you ever feel the need for compassion then you’re a failure as man, regardless of the circumstances”).?

    Seriously, at what point do we rip feminism’s ideological foundations out from under it, make every women’s issue about female infantalisation (which is the case of all inequality which women face) and in doing so expose the male disposability which facilitates it?

    Until we not merely debate feminists, but engage in a definition debate which causes their entire dogma to collapse like a house of cards, will we see a profound move towards men truly being regarded as human beings – as opposed to disposable based on how either traditionalism or feminism wishes to use and discard us?

    • Let’s suppose for a minute that she’s right and videogames do make men more violent.

      Why should be suppose something that is not true?

      We minimise it or dismiss it as feminist scaremongering, but when to we stop, flip it around and rightly accuse society and women of sexually objectifying men every single time they say “I want a real man” or in addition, child grooming when men and women tell little boys to “be a man” (in other words “only value yourself in terms of the ability to provide, ability to protect and sexual prowess – oh not only is all sex you have automatically consensual because you have a penis, but if you ever feel the need for compassion then you’re a failure as man, regardless of the circumstances”).?

      This is not sexual objectification. It’s shaming tactics.

      • First off, you claim that any claims that video games increase the normalisation of violence are untrue. However the fact is that video games (in addition to movies) have recently proven, in the case of young Australian troops in Afghanistan, to have caused distorted perceptions of warfare (http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/political-news/blast-for-gladiator-diggers-20130313-2g0xm.html).

        To claim there is no link to multimedia entertainment normalising certain things is as absurd as claiming that multimedia entertainment definitively normalises certain things.

        Furthermore, the point you’ve missed is that even if there had been a link found, it would merely prove the existence of the very male disposability that feminists and traditionalists perpetuate. Yet this aspect of things is often ignored.

        Secondly, in your quest to oppose feminism, you have forgotten the most fundamental rule of any kind of struggle- namely to know your enemy and have adopted a stance, at least on this issue, which is decidedly anti-men’s rights.

        The fact is that feminism is entirely founded on traditionalism. What lies at the heart of the notion of “patriarchy” and at the heart of the fallacy of “all men re exclusively predators; all women are exclusively victims” is the paradigm of male-disaposability/female infantalisation.

        What you have failed to grasp is that feminist attitudes are anything but original inventions on their part. All feminism is is a manipulation of traditionalism where male-disposability is used to demonise men and female-infantalisation is used to grant women complete legal impunity.

        Feminism certainly created the notion of men as perpetual rapists, but it was traditionalists, in their view that the child rape of a boy by a pedophile is a rite of passage (particularly a female pedophile), the notion that a penis equates to arbirtary consent and the notion that a battered man is a pathetic joke that “got beaten up by a woman”. It also views homeless men as “failures” rather than seeking to find compassion and ask what the circumstances where which made said homeless man destitute to begin with.

        To claim it’s mere feminist male shaming, as opposed to systemised sexual objectification of men into tools of utility who are regarded by society as perpetual “uncovered meat” and only good for being ATMs on legs, human shields/hired muscle and dicks on legs (perpetual “beefcakes” in other words) – is to in effect defend the status quo and in doing so, take a misandrist stance on male social identity.

    • Let’s suppose for a minute that she’s right and videogames do make men more violent.
      I know right, the Taliban, IRA and LTTE were playing GTA4 all the time.

  2. “Take sexual objectification for example. We minimise it or dismiss it as feminist scaremongering, but when to we stop, flip it around and rightly accuse society and women of sexually objectifying men every single time they say “I want a real man” or in addition, child grooming when men and women tell little boys to “be a man” (in other words “only value yourself in terms of the ability to provide, ability to protect and sexual prowess – oh not only is all sex you have automatically consensual because you have a penis, but if you ever feel the need for compassion then you’re a failure as man, regardless of the circumstances”).?”

    We tried it. We sound just as stupid as they do talking like that. Even if you catch them red-handed violating their own dogmas and standards,all they do is change the wording to make it less intelligible and go on as if nothing happened. Instead of going “But what about the rape culture? But what about the patriarchy? But what about the (invisible and non-existent) apartheid against western women (in their deluded minds)?” what we need to be doing is mockingly sneering “But what about the Good Witch of the North!? What about Santa and his eight tiny reindeer!?” when they start talking about this nonsense. Refute their points,of course, explain why it’s bullshit to those who are capable of listening and understanding, but really just smack them down. The reason why the simpleminded rent-seekers latch onto them and make their movement effective is because they win. If they don’t win,but instead get punked like little bitches every time they open their mouths, nobody will want to be associated with them anymore. Not greedy rent-seekers, and especially not those who associate feminism with making gains for women,i.e. the fanatics.

    • You’ve just proven my point for me. For starters, of course talking about the victimisation and dehumanisation of men sounds ridiculous to the average person- we’re talking about a culture that is institutionalised going back thousands of years to the dawn of civilisation. By that logic,l the African American community should have given up on civil rights in the late 19th century because the notion of African Ameriicans being treated as human beings, let alone equals, was considered “stupid” at the time.

      Here’s how I’d debunk all three examples you’vve raised right ooff the top of my head-

      “What about rape culture?”

      Let’s talk about what the real “rape culture” is in society. You feminists rail against women being treated like “uncovered meat” based on how they’re dressed but happily treat men like predatory “uncovered meat” because they have a penis. If a woman was treated that way because they have a clitoris, you’d be rioting in the streets, but who cares about a bunch of worthless dicks on legs right?! It’s because of chauvinistic pigs like you that 12 year old boys are forced by courts to pay child support when female pedophiles rape them and fall pregnant from it. Heck it’s becuse of chauvinistic pigs like you that the law gives rapists a frree pass and rape victims the middle finger on the grounds of what’s between their legs.

      But go on, tell me how a child sex victim is a perpetual predator and a child sex predator is a poor helpless victim under your patriarchal chauvinistic dogma again?

      “What about Patriarchy?”

      What, you mean the flawed Zeitgeaist based fallacy that in the case of Australia for example, would claim that homeless men somehow oppress mining magnate Gina Rinehart, Westpac CEO Gail Kelly, Federal Attourney General Nicola Roxon, Prime Minister Julia Gillard, Governor General Quentin Bryce and Queen Elizabeth. Explain to me again how that’s so and try not to come across as a suppporter of eugenics in the process.

      Oh that’s right, I forgot, any man who isn’t a “real man” in society is subhuman scum to you feminists, as much as they are to traditionalists, aren’t they?

      If they start with crocodile tears, demand they stop hiding behing their genitalia and be an accountable adult.

      If anyone “white knights” accuse them of engaging in the very paternalism which relegated women to the bedroom and the kitchen for centuries.

      The danger with just sneering, and not in fact exposing them as purveyors of chauvinism, is that traditionalism gets a free pass. The problem there is, contrary to what many less enlightened MRAs might think- a return to traditionalism will not give us mens right- it will merely subject us to the same dehuman isation, chauvinism and objectification. The only difference will be that we’ll be getting smoke blown up our asses instead of scorn poured on us while it happens.

  3. anita really is the perfect representative for feminism. a stuck up airhead who wants to pass herself off as a cultured and intelligent victim of some vast (right wing?) conspiracy to keep women down. she spent a few years studying garbage and now thinks she can never be wrong about any bullshit she spouts.

    • There are lots of young women like her graduating from college every year – women’s studies majors whose only “skill” is finding new things to hate and blame men for.

  4. “Sarkessian used everyone that was angry at her about an unrelated topic to whine, “HELP, HELP!!!! I’m the victim of an organized attacked by misogynists.”

    Like a damsel in distress…

    • Damsel my a*** … more likely a fraud and a big-time fraud at that.
      Now I wonder who’s going to start asking her how’s she’s spending that 150K she wheedled off Kickstarter.

Leave a Comment. (Remember the comment policy is in force.)

Cheap Jerseys Wholesale Jerseys Cheap Jerseys Wholesale Jerseys Cheap Jerseys Cheap NFL Jerseys Wholesale Jerseys Wholesale Football Jerseys Wholesale Jerseys Wholesale NFL Jerseys Cheap NFL Jerseys Wholesale NFL Jerseys Cheap NHL Jerseys Wholesale NHL Jerseys Cheap NBA Jerseys Wholesale NBA Jerseys Cheap MLB Jerseys Wholesale MLB Jerseys Cheap College Jerseys Cheap NCAA Jerseys Wholesale College Jerseys Wholesale NCAA Jerseys Cheap Soccer Jerseys Wholesale Soccer Jerseys Cheap Soccer Jerseys Wholesale Soccer Jerseys
Translate »
%d bloggers like this: