One of my most popular posts is ”It’s No Surprise That Young Men Are Getting Fed Up With Women Faster Than Any Other Group Of Men” about how men under 30 are getting fed up with women. It continues to be linked to and generate hits for this blog even though it was written close to a year ago. It also continues to get new comments, but recently a woman named Cynthia commented on that post in a bizarre attempt to redefine the term, “slut”:
You should also realize, that I would not call these girls sluts, I mean they only sleep with attractive guys, not any guy.
This is quite possibly the most bizarre way to get out of being called a slut that I have ever seen. And Cynthia is a conservative, too, once again showing that conservatives are obsessed with making the world “safe” for sluts. Nothing Cynthia tries will work because the term, slut, is impervious to being redefined since men will use the word, “slut” as we wish. Even if you don’t have sex with unattractive guys, you’re still a slut, women, and nothing will change that.
Perhaps Cynthia would prefer the term “groupie.”
Cynthia also seems to be trying to help counter the feminist griefers that come here to comment on how our mannood is lacking. I don’t fault her for that. I think, in may ways, true conservatives are more prone to acceptance of red pill wisdom. After all, the argument can be made that game is merely a restoration of traditional masculinity. Roissy himself said that in a previous era, game would primarily be used for the benefit of wives.
Many conservatives are more accepting of reality at times, but they still hold forth the female imperative. Their seeming support of a return to traditional masculinity is not because they care about the well-being and happiness of men, it is so the man will return to provider roles for women. Therefore they are not really accepting of red-pill wisdom at all, as the red pill should remove any social or personal obligation from men to care for women.
It’s a laughable comment.
Of course sluts sleep with attractive men, dunderhead. It’s the attractive men who get to sleep with lots of women. Sluts aren’t any less selective about who they will spread for, they just will spread more often once that selective group is in range. Sluthood isn’t “those women aren’t selective” — they are just as selective as any other women are. Sluthood is about spreading the legs quickly for a man they find attractive — simple as that.
LOL, so a woman can sleep with 200 men and still not be a slut, as long as she turns down all the unattractive men she doesn’t want anyway? That’s setting the “good girl” bar pretty low…
PMAFT,
There are a number of comments at Dalrock’s that you will like, starting with this one :
http://dalrock.wordpress.com/2013/01/09/a-criticism-too-kind/#comment-66697
It is an epic thread.
That thread should be required reading for any man seriously considering marriage, to give him a good idea of what he’ll be up against if he does go through with it.
so she’s holding out for men who are only willing to meet her price.
no, I guess that isn’t a slut. there’s another word for that, but slut isn’t it. grats ladies, you are no longer known as sluts.
O.T
But shouldn’t you do an article on this?
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/scientists-rewrite-rules-of-human-reproduction-7624708.html
(Unless you already did, and I missed it).
Great blog, btw, just found it recently
Each word shall mean exactly what I want it to mean at any moment in time I want it to have that meaning. Or, as Deti would say, she’s hamsterbating.
Saying that a woman isn’t slutty because she only sleeps with attractive guys, is like saying a 300-pound woman isn’t obese because she only eats gourmet food.