Aug 112012
 

This week the NASA landed the curiosity rover on Mars. Forbes magazine decided to ignore most of the people who made this historic achievement happen, namely men, in favor of congratulating the few women involved.  The male scientists and engineers who made this happen and did all of the real work are being ignored in favor of women who are doing “important” tasks like providing a twitter feed of the rover.  (If the government was serious about saving money, it could start by having the curiosity rover could easily do its own tweeting without a “social media team” on Earth.)

What would happen if you reversed the ratio of men to women involved with the curiosity rover?  Would the men get any congratulations?  Of course not, but that is a trick question.  If the ratio of men to women was reversed, there would be no curiosity rover.  Instead there would just be a lot of tweets about it.

  6 Responses to “What Would Happen If You Reversed The Ratio?”

  1. Feminists just don’t get how weak and pathetic they look whenever they celebrate the relatively few women who demonstrate competency in things that men are expected to excel at as a matter of course.

  2. […] business/job?  This isn’t an idle question. I started thinking about this as I was reading PMAFT’s blog today where he talked about how if there were more women involved in the NASA&#82….  On a similar note, PMAFT also wrote a month ago on the 50th anniversary of the first broadcast […]

  3. if nasa was replaced entirely by women:
    80 person hugbox for every equation made
    the shuttles would be shaped like large bowls (the least aerodynamic shape)
    no mission would ever be launched again
    it could cost 20x more than the current program

  4. “Of course not, but that is a trick question. If the ratio of men to women was reversed, there would be no curiosity rover. Instead there would just be a lot of tweets about it.”

    Funny, but true.

    So, for another “trick question”: if NASA was staffed entirely with women, would men still be to blame for nothing getting done (aside from the social media “sharing”, of course)?

  5. Forbes has become nothing more than a female chauvinist piece of shit (more commonly known as a feminist mouthpiece)

Leave a Comment. (Remember the comment policy is in force.)

Cheap Jerseys Wholesale Jerseys Cheap Jerseys Wholesale Jerseys Cheap Jerseys Cheap NFL Jerseys Wholesale Jerseys Wholesale Football Jerseys Wholesale Jerseys Wholesale NFL Jerseys Cheap NFL Jerseys Wholesale NFL Jerseys Cheap NHL Jerseys Wholesale NHL Jerseys Cheap NBA Jerseys Wholesale NBA Jerseys Cheap MLB Jerseys Wholesale MLB Jerseys Cheap College Jerseys Cheap NCAA Jerseys Wholesale College Jerseys Wholesale NCAA Jerseys Cheap Soccer Jerseys Wholesale Soccer Jerseys Cheap Soccer Jerseys Wholesale Soccer Jerseys
Translate »
%d bloggers like this: