May 272012
 

I thought that my previous post about Susan Walsh where I documented how she is deleting comments that mention androsphere personalities like Rollo Tomassi and Dalrock was the last thing I would say about her.  I have to document her latest descent into insanity.  Rmaxd has let us know that she is deleting posts now.  Specifically, Susan Walsh has deleted a post called “The Wisdom of Yohami” which referenced Yohami.  She can’t really totally get rid of it since links to it are everywhere.

Susan Walsh’s deletion spree continues.  Before it was Rollo and Dalrock.  Now it’s Yohami.  We should start a betting pool on who Susan Walsh will choose next to remove all references to on her blog.

At this point it should be clear to anyone what Susan Walsh really is although guys like MarkyMark will still defend her.

  22 Responses to “First She Deleted Comments, Now She Is Deleting Posts”

  1. There’s some wisdom on that page, though. I couldnt say it better:

    “Hit the “back” button on your browser. It’s perfect for situations like this!”

  2. Very predictable and utterly lame – well, most female bloggers and journalists are like that anyway, so it’s really not much of a surprise. She’s just another virulent, vindictive, insufferable old broad with delusions of grandeur. Aren’t there enough of those already? Oh well. The older MRAs are right – it’s utterly pointless to try have a rational debate with any woman about the SMP and gender relations in general. And we know women are born authoritarians. Examine the history of any dictatorship and you’ll find its main supporters and facilitators were women. They have absolutely no respect for, or any understanding of, the concept of freedom.The drive for servitude and mindless submission is in their blood.

  3. “She’s just another virulent, vindictive, insufferable old broad”

    Blah blah blah, who’s still more respected than you. Good for her, cleaning out the site.

  4. Reminds me of the Old Soviet Union, where party apparatchiks were scrubbed from photos by Stalin’s henchmen once they fell out of favor. Wonder if there are any pix of the offending manosphere bloggers that need to be retouched?

  5. Actually, I think the trendlines here are good. First comments, then posts, next, the entire site?

    One can hope.

  6. It’s not at all shocking. Susan is not running an intellectually honest house and never has.

    Men and women debate in totally different ways.

    Men try to win the argument to get the crowd. They advance an argument and debate with the purpose of convincing people with their logic and take their detractors head-on point-by-point.

    Women try to get the crowd to win the argument. They appeal to the emotions of people to get the crowd to have the same emotion and therefore reach the same (emotional) conclusion.

    And what better way to get the crowd than to control its composition? If someone wants to poke holes in your argument, it’s easier to just shift the frame of the discussion by deleting detracting comments than answering them head on.

    Susan’s blog is just a circle jerk of whiney carousel riders and manginas. “How do I get a boyfriend? Guys only want to pump and dump me!” Well, um, maybe you should try getting off the carousel and go get a beta. Every single post is the same theme over and over again.

    The one thing that is clear is this: Susan is no friend of men. She’s just another feminist in sheep’s clothing.

    • Men try to win the argument to get the crowd. They advance an argument and debate with the purpose of convincing people with their logic and take their detractors head-on point-by-point.

      Women try to get the crowd to win the argument. They appeal to the emotions of people to get the crowd to have the same emotion and therefore reach the same (emotional) conclusion.

      And what better way to get the crowd than to control its composition? If someone wants to poke holes in your argument, it’s easier to just shift the frame of the discussion by deleting detracting comments than answering them head on.

      That’s an insightful comment…

  7. So she’s still digging holes, eh?

    @ Twenty – Indeed! LOL

  8. Dalrock & Walsh should be giving the following advice to women …

    Actually the advice Walsh should be giving women is to freeze their eggs in their 20’s

    Go get a career & then impregnate themselves with their own eggs, when they hit their 30’s

    That way no beta’s or men are used or abused by women with baby rabies …

    Of course they would no longer have a personal walking wallet on call, enforced by corrupt bent police, & corrupt judges ..

    Which leads to exactly why Walsh doesnt give the above advice …

    She benefits from her husband slaving away for her, 7 days a week, while she blogs about men giving her gina tingles in her own comments section …

    Oh yea … Walsh is a stayathome mom … a known carousel rider becomes a stayathome mom …

    It doesnt get more disgusting then that …

    • Stay-at-home mom with an MBA?
      So much for “when women are educated, they will be bringing home the bacon”.
      Her education has been wasted.
      But I’m betting she pulls in the money through speaking gigs, advertising on her site and blogging appearances.

  9. Just in case TedD or Jesus Mahoney happen upon this comment thread:

    Gentlemen, the Matrix has you.

  10. […] Word on the street is that Aunt Giggles (a.k.a. Susan Walsh) is now deleting any comments which mention Dalrock, Rollo, or Yohami. Truth will out. Groovy. […]

  11. […] Word on the street is that Aunt Giggles (a.k.a. Susan Walsh) is now deleting any comments which mention Dalrock, Rollo, or Yohami. Truth will out. Groovy. […]

    Really?! Just for the mere MENTION of a name people are getting banned @ HUS?

  12. Sounds like desperation. She realized midstream that her arguments have no legs, and that pointing out the existence and location of the manosphere did her cause more damage, no matter her denunciations.

  13. […] you know this, then you won’t be surprised by Susan Walsh doing things like deleting posts that mention various androsphere individuals and the rest of her behavior. Share this:EmailPrintDiggShare on Tumblr  Posted by […]

  14. Girl writes what is pretty good.

  15. Well, do they actually argue with men? Do they patiently listen to men who say what they don’t want to hear? Or is that they’re given disproportionate attention because they’re women?

Leave a Comment. (Remember the comment policy is in force.)

Cheap Jerseys Wholesale Jerseys Cheap Jerseys Wholesale Jerseys Cheap Jerseys Cheap NFL Jerseys Wholesale Jerseys Wholesale Football Jerseys Wholesale Jerseys Wholesale NFL Jerseys Cheap NFL Jerseys Wholesale NFL Jerseys Cheap NHL Jerseys Wholesale NHL Jerseys Cheap NBA Jerseys Wholesale NBA Jerseys Cheap MLB Jerseys Wholesale MLB Jerseys Cheap College Jerseys Cheap NCAA Jerseys Wholesale College Jerseys Wholesale NCAA Jerseys Cheap Soccer Jerseys Wholesale Soccer Jerseys Cheap Soccer Jerseys Wholesale Soccer Jerseys
Translate »
%d bloggers like this:
Cheap Jerseys Wholesale Jerseys Cheap Jerseys Wholesale Jerseys Cheap Jerseys Cheap NFL Jerseys Wholesale Jerseys Wholesale Football Jerseys Wholesale Jerseys Wholesale NFL Jerseys Cheap NFL Jerseys Wholesale NFL Jerseys Cheap NHL Jerseys Wholesale NHL Jerseys Cheap NBA Jerseys Wholesale NBA Jerseys Cheap MLB Jerseys Wholesale MLB Jerseys Cheap College Jerseys Cheap NCAA Jerseys Wholesale College Jerseys Wholesale NCAA Jerseys Cheap Soccer Jerseys Wholesale Soccer Jerseys Cheap Soccer Jerseys Wholesale Soccer Jerseys