When it comes down to it, game 2.0 proponents don’t truly understand game. They may think they do, but they don’t. What they’re dealing with is a “watered down” version of game:
“that is NOT game 101. that is WATERED DOWN game 101.”
Susan’s biggest problem is that she *thinks* she understands game, and men.
Well, it’s not what we know in life that gets us into trouble; it’s what we think we know that just ain’t so.
Susan is, and will always be, part of Team Woman.
What does “watered down game” attempt to produce? Some would call it a “better beta”, but it would be accurate to say a “better” chump. The biggest threat to form of promiscuity women prefer is men who were supposed to be the chumps that they married realizing the truth and avoiding becoming a chump. Whether these men decided to become a PUA or a ghost or something in between doesn’t matter. With knowledge these men can choose a path other than being a chump. The weakest link (to women) in the female preferred form of promiscuity is finding a chump when a woman is done with the alpha carousel because either the chumps will discover the truth and not be chumps or the chumps won’t be attractive to women. Game 2.0 tries to attack that problem by watering down game so only the desired result of a “better” chump can be produced. This will never work since game 2.0 proponents don’t truly understand game in the first place.