When juggling three women, eventually you will run into a situation where you have to pick one. Usually, it’s not a problem, but when it comes to something like New Year’s Eve, which is tonight, each of my women want my exclusive presence. Each of my women think they’re “the girlfriend” and the other two are chicks I occasionally bang. I have to keep each of them thinking they’re “the girlfriend” since my purpose in picking up women at the Sunday Morning Nightclub is to prevent women from getting their hands on men who they will marry, use up, and divorce. Thus, I ran into a situation where I had to pick one.
I picked Molly because she’s the newest. I was looking for a reason to dump Sabrina and Kate. All of you should remember I already tried that once, and they begged and begged and begged me to take them back which got me to take them back. I think I have been with the two of them for too long as it is, Sabrina in particular. Sabrina was sending some strong messages that she was thinking it close to time to get engaged. Breaking up with Sabrina and Kate wasn’t fun at all. I will spare you guys the details. Needless to say they were very angry when they realized they weren’t (or were no longer) “the girlfriend”. This time, I think my breaking up with them will stick because it was clear I picked another woman over them.
You could have selected girl #4 or gone solo with your guy friends, thereby maintaining parity between girls 1, 2, and 3.
A perfect time to be out of the country. Or “out of the country”.
When I was younger, I tried the player lifestyle for a while, with two-three girls on the string at one time, but I just found the drama around holidays completely draining. Perhaps I wasn’t as good about managing expectations, but all of the girls I was dating expected to be with me (alone) on my birthday, New Year’s Eve, Christmas Eve (and day), Thanksgiving dinner, Valentines Day (DING DING DING) and a few other events.
So, I found that virtually every holiday or life-event a wedding in the family, a death, a birth, etc., was accompanied by emotional drama from the girls I was dating who couldn’t be present, because the top girl would have been pissed, and she was my primary relationship.
I found it was too much like work, so phased out of the soft-harem thing. Fortunately, I found a good, non-feminist woman, married her, and we’ve just passed our 16th anniversary. Back then, you could still find a few worth keeping if you looked.
Keep up the good work!
Question: can an older guy do the Sunday Morning Nightclub thing too? Would there be some single mother cougars that an older guy like me could target? I mean, they’ll be looking for their own chumps, so perhaps an older guy like me (be 50 in Feb) could, er, ‘minister’ to these older women? I was thinking of targeting women 35 and older.
I’ve spent the whole afternoon reading your whole series of posts on this, and I find it fascinating! I was thinking of doing the SMNC thing myself…
I would assume so. You probably would need to target more suburban churches. A lot of the women in your age range might be divorced and/or have kids. They would be looking for chumps, but for slightly different reasons. If you’re fine with that then I don’t see why you couldn’t make it work.
What you might need to think about is if these women who have children could go after you for child support on the argument that you were “like a father” to those kids. That could make it a bad idea.
Most of these divorced women, if they married young, would have older children in their teens-not much of a danger. If the women I target have kids who are teenagers or older, that would mitigate the risk I would think But yeah, the ‘father figure’ issue is a danger.
So, what demographic would be best to target? Which one would offer good odds of success?
One thing I could do to minimize the danger is only spend time with these women when the kids are with the ex-no time with the kids, no proximity, no bond=no father figure=no CS.
If their bio dad is paying child support there’s essentially no danger of that.
I think the danger is pretty low in any case.
You juggle women around, and we’re supposed to feel sorry for any feminist wrongs you may have suffered, little boy? Don’t think so.
@anon. In your arrogance and pride you’ve murdered civilization. PMAFT is the future of men now. Actually its going to be much worse because PMAFT is that future with something resembling a concience. There wont be a conscience in the upcoming generations, or families, or communities. Just hives and herds of milling animals with sentience. Properly guided and trained by their equally nihilistic government.
Because the nature of woman is that of a slave, nothing is more appealing to women than the totalitarian state, we should never have let you gain power.
These women would rather have a fraction of PM/AFT’s attention than ALL the love of an “upstanding” man who would never do this to them. This is the reality of female sexuality laid bare.
Feminism has set women back by thousands of years by encouraging women to follow their “hearts.” Women’s “hearts” are actually their pre-civilization sexual instincts wherein women share the top few men. They’re getting exactly what they want by having this type of relationship with PM/AFT.
“BRIFFAULT’S LAW:
The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place.”