I don’t believe that MRAs tell the truth about their experience with women. Some of them say they have a girlfriend/wife while it’s obviously false – guys that brags their girlfriend is a virgin supermodel member of MENSA. Some say they have submissive girlfriend/wife and they lie (Dalrock say that he’s a happily married Christian man and it’s obvious from what he writes that he’s not happy and very frustrated).
All right, I admit it. All the women I talked about banging and being my girlfriends are completely made up. Who else is making up girlfriends, wives, and sex partners? Come on admit it.
Seriously? WTF? I could post a video of myself in 1080p in 3D having sex with a woman or the time I had a threesome or have sex with a woman right in front of him, and this guy will still claim that I’m not getting laid. This is how wedded our our enemies are to the idea that all of us are losers who can’t get laid. First, it doesn’t matter if any of us are having sex or not. Second, even though most of us are getting laid and/or have girlfriends, our enemies just say this over and over again (if they don’t go the code magenta route of accusing us of preying on defenseless women).
The argument against code purple shaming language is usually about that whether a man is getting laid or not is not relevant to his ideas. That is correct of course, and the principle we need to defend. However, that doesn’t mean we can’t fight code purple shaming language in other ways. Pointing out that code purple shaming language is used against men who get laid regularly really knocks out the legs from under it. It’s the ultimate way of showing the principle that mens rights ideas aren’t based on whether he is getting laid or not. Plus, it makes our enemies look like the absurd morons they are.
Now, if you will excuse me, I am going to have sex with a virgin supermodel MENSA member.