Now, of course, they only really take this libertarianism stance on things they hate (for example, women). I’m pretty sure they’d be willing to fork over our “hard-earned tax dollars” to start government agencies and programs they’d like. For instance, a bunch of fedora wearing G-Men–the mostly manly of many menz–who’d track down all those false rape accusers like Ness did with Capone.
Putting aside the fedora and manly men garbage, and the libertarianism since the MRM has a much broader political base than that, this shows what feminists are all about. This feminist is arguing that the government should give women money, but not engage in LAW ENFORCEMENT when women commit crimes against men. The government should be going after false rape accusers, women who commit paternity fraud, etc. Law enforcement, not transfer payments, is the government’s primary job.
When someone talks about a “government program”, they are referring to some sort of socialist transfer payment system or something like socialized medicine. Things like law enforcement and the military aren’t considered to be “government programs” in common language. This means that this feminist could not come up with a government program that men would actually want. Instead she had to shove law enforcement into the definition of “government program”. This allows us to show a very compelling contrast between feminists and MRAs. Feminists want large oppressive government to give them money, which can only be done by theft from men, whereas MRAs just want women who violate the reasonable and just laws against false accusations, perjury, paternity fraud, other forms of fraud, etc. to be prosecuted.