One of the biggest strengths of mens rights is it’s ability to provide data and evidence:
Leave alone MRA, they have a capability to provide data and evidence way beyond this One-what blogger could ever do.
Marriage has benefits? Provide data. MRA can provide statistics and experience about courts, media, cops.
Not going on their way? If it seems a loser move, many MRA does not mean it as a refusal of sex altogether. Just the crap called marriage.
I am starting to believe MRA in abstract is too complicatd to understand for the average internet user (or blogger like that). MRA relates to men’s rights, not state, not religion, not any fucking else. No men’s rights? No civilization. Realize it.
While all of this is true, it goes beyond that. While the MRM can provide data and evidence that it is correct, many men will experience the evidence directly (such as dealing with anti-family courts or a false sexual harassment allegation) or indirectly (knowing a man who has been the victim of feminism). This is the reason that many men will come to conclusions that agree with MRAs and MGTOW before finding MRA and MGTOW blogs (if they ever find them).
PMAFT,
It is exactly for this reason that the URLs @ Urinals campaign has so much potential.
Men have seen anecdotes, come to about 20% of the conclusions themselves, but would not figure out the other 80% without coming to our various blogs. The flyers not only distribute a lot more ‘red pills’ all over by sparking curiosity within the ‘Group A’ of men, but is highly scalable. One of us can post flyers that another 5000 men might see. What if 20 of us posted flyers?
We must all put in more effort to post flyers. The attendance in this ‘sphere can rise by an order of magnitude.