We hear a lot about how certain types of women such as traditionalist women or libertarian women are supposed to be different from the standard feminist (or feminism influenced) women. That is not the case. Women are the same everywhere. Libertarian women say that women have been “tricked” into support [anti-male] big government and need libertarian “women’s groups” to “feel safe” (as if libertarian men were going to attack them).
Those examples don’t compare to what I found from Haley at Haley’s Halo. She is a religious woman and either a socon or a tradcon, but that did not stop her from writing this anti-white male garbage:
The reason that women resist and reject advice to flatter men is basically an issue of power. You wouldn’t know it from reading manosphere sites, but men, especially if white and educated, get the majority of perks in the world. They get the best jobs. They occupy the top of pretty much every occupational field, fields of women’s interests included (fashion, beauty, cooking, media). They make the most money. They’re more implicitly trusted in matters of business. They get to have sex with tons of people and receive very little judgment for it. They get to marry women young enough to be their daughters and have kids at age 70. They get to be funny, outrageous, outspoken, and wild, and people just chuckle affectionately. (Women who are funny, outrageous, outspoken, and wild, on the other hand, just get called bitches, sluts, and bulldykes.) They get to do most of the exciting and interesting things in this world, and they tend to think they know everything about everything. And generally they don’t pay much of a social price for getting fat and dressing dumpy.
Meanwhile, women are expected to be quiet and have babies, always be up for sex, never gain any weight, and never have an opinion that contradicts a man’s.
Given these circumstances, it’s pretty easy to see why a modern woman balks at making a man feel good about himself. In her mind, he already has the world’s oyster in his palm. Giving him MORE sex, MORE compliments, and MORE deference is only going to inflate his ego even more than it already is and make him feel even more entitled to the things society has already given him. And what, exactly, has this man done to earn any of these things other than be born with a penis? Furthermore, if a woman flatters a man’s ego, he will just take her for granted and feel he has the ability to make unqualified demands as well as the right not to be of any help to the woman. Women can’t see how treating a man well (i.e., like a ’50s homemaker) for no reason other than that he is a man can result in anything good for themselves.
Additionally, every woman either has a friend or knows somebody who got a boyfriend and then turned into a Stepford wife who has to get permission just to go to the mall, and while she’s there, her boyfriend will be constantly checking in on her and demanding to know all the details of what she’s doing. And the friend will insist that he’s just doing this because he loves her. No sane woman wants this to happen to her or be seen as weak and controllable, so that’s another reason that women tend to be resistant to giving men what they want.
Some of this attitude stems from hypergamy. Women all want the best men for themselves, but women know that those men have options and in many cases have no compunction about straying. A woman could treat such a man as a king, and she still runs the risk of his cheating. So in a defensive measure, the woman will do what she thinks will earn her greater respect and shore up her power, which is to deny the man what he wants or thinks he is entitled to. Then the man won’t feel quite so secure about walking all over her, because now he knows there is a price to pay.
The comments at Haley’s Halo already cover most of the things wrong with this such as the use of the apex fallacy. Take a look at what this is in general. Any feminist or even any type of leftist could have written this. If I showed this to you (perhaps minus the hypergamy bit) without telling you who wrote it, you would think some feminist or leftist wrote it. This means that even socon and tradcon women are so influenced by feminism and leftism that their thought processes are indistinguishable from actual feminists.