Jul 012010
 

I got a strange and silly comment to my previous post about why we need transhumanism:

It worries me to see transhumanism invoked to bolster male supremacy. My own project has exactly the opposite focus. I wish your anti-feminist agenda the worst of luck.

I took a look at her website.  She wrote this post about mine (when she’s not worrying about how the patriarchy is going to use brain scans to read her mind):

That’s what some men’s rights activists are angling for. Combined with the male-supremacist piece that Valkyrie Ice let me know about, it’s enough to make me worried. For transhumanism to have any hope of effecting positive change, it’s got to be pro-feminist. We’re talking about a global human rights crisis here, folks.

The “male supremacist piece” that she refers to is The Misandry Bubble.  Two random guys on the internet, other MRAs and myself, have her “worried”.  Maybe its because she convinced herself of something as crazy as the idea that other MRAs and I can cause a “global human rights crisis” all by ourselves.

I did a little more looking around that blog and came up with this comment from that Valkyrie Ice:

Don’t know if you read it, but I was violently offended by a post made back in Jan. It was titled the “The Misandry Bubble”

It still makes me fume…THE NUMBER OF IDIOTS AGREEING WITH HIM WAS EVEN WORSE!.

This comment was written a week ago.  The Misandry Bubble is was posted in January.  This sounds like that woman from last year who kept getting “rage blackouts” from my science fiction post.

It gets even “better” with this guy:

I’ve been pretty strongly dissatisfied with the suboptimal ethicality of my heterosexuality for as long as I can remember (as opposed to a more inclusive, less visually locked pan/bi)

He also says:

I was raised in an obsessive socialist-feminist bubble ridiculously disconnected from the outside world (absolutely no tv, magazines, leaving the school environment, etc), yet I strongly triggered on a certain range of thin female forms the moment I hit puberty and it certainly wasn’t reflective of something like how they carried themselves.

If you ever needed proof that socialism and feminism cause mental illness, here it is.  This guy is filled with self-hate and self-loathing.

We really have nothing to worry about from people like these.  It’s like all of the articles about how “men are obsolete”.  Whether its these lunatics or the authors of the “men are obsolete” pieces none of them are doing any real work to advance technology.  They’re writing blogs and magazine articles instead of being scientists and engineers.  All they can do is complain how the “scientific establishment” disagrees with them or complain about sex bots.

  53 Responses to “I Cause Global Human Rights Crises”

  1. Maybe its because she convinced herself of something as crazy as the idea that I and others can cause a “global human rights crisis” all by ourselves.

    This is a misunderstanding. Male supremacy is everywhere; I see it each day all around me. It’s alive and well within transhumanism. You and others are merely some of its more explicit proponents. The global human rights crisis I refer to includes myriad horrors such as human trafficking in the pay-for-rape sex industry, rape culture in general, compulsory pregnancy, denial of reproductive rights, and the ubiquitous devaluation of women’s work.

  2. They’ve got vibrators, we want sexbots, we’re going to get them, fuck feminists and their unbelievable hypocrisy and one-sidedness (and I might add, increasing sexual desperation).

    I DO NOT care – in the slightest – about how women feel regarding sexbots, transhumanism, etc.

  3. From SS’s site:

    Instead of building sexbots for corporate profits, we should leverage technology for a feminist revolution that smashes the gender distinction itself and establishes a new egalitarian sexuality.

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

    Think I found your problem here,honey.

    First of all, the obvious hatred you have for your own genitals is probably what is causing you to “see male supremacy everywhere”, a thief thinks people are always trying to steal from him too.

    Second, you’re never gonna “smash the gender distinction itself”, you might as well be vowing to “smash gravity”. Just because you can get people to believe there’s no such thing as sex won’t change the fact that you have a hole between your legs that bleeds every month, sorry babe.

    I’m male, you’re female, deal with it.

  4. Note that a number of these people are Transexuals.

    I remember one commenter on Betterhumans.com who said he had been castrated, allegedly to adhere to some transhumanist ideal of detachment. He was fascinated with his de-balling and brought up the subject in nearly every post he made.

    I’m quite sure that “women” like Valkyrie Ice would be supportive and enthusiastic about a man neutering himself in the name of transhumanism. So I’m disappointed that she doesn’t extend this tolerance to men banging hot sex robots. Why won’t she celebrate our diversity of sexual choices? Why can’t we all just get along?

  5. Make jokes all you want PMAFT but you are a misogynist filled with delusional ideas about male supremacy. I feel so sorry for your girlfriend. Sabrina isn’t it? She doesn’t exist to be your servant or sexual plaything. I don’t care if you think that being tall or having more inches of penis than the average man makes you superior to women. You are everything that is wrong with masculinity.

    • Make jokes all you want PMAFT but you are a misogynist filled with delusional ideas about male supremacy.

      What does this even mean?

      Could you morons at least get your words formed into coherent sentences before you come here spouting your bullshit,hun? Think we can shoot for that?

      • It means that PMAFT is a practitioner of male supremacy. I have seen how males like PMAFT treat the women in their lives and it’s always the same. They are controlling and demand complete and total sexual obedience from their women. PMAFT is a thousand times worse than the average misogynist male in how he treats women.

        • He’s always been very kind to me, answering questions I’ve had about this or that and pointing me towards interesting information to explore certain topics further.

          And to think I didn’t even have to be used as one of his “cum dumpsters” to make this happen!

          Illuminati leadership positions have their perks, what can I say!

        • Actually PMAFT isn’t a misogynist. Although his Spearhead brothers are, PMAFT can’t be, because his genitals are so large, they horrify women.

        • Alexis says:
          07/03/2010 at 2:15 PM

          It means that PMAFT is a practitioner of male supremacy.

          Well, good – the dude is my hero. There needs to be more practitioners of male supremacy.

          I have seen how males like PMAFT treat the women in their lives and it’s always the same. They are controlling and demand complete and total sexual obedience from their women.

          Where and how exactly does he do this? On his annual vacations to the planet Gor? That’s a science fiction series where women are frequently kept as slaves.

          PMAFT is a thousand times worse than the average misogynist male in how he treats women.

          Why? What’s he done that’s so bad? You should be grateful that men like him and others are making people aware of the erotic possibilites of sexbots and VR porn. Soon women won’t have to be bothered by the lecherous sexual attentions of men.

        • Where and how exactly does he do this?

          PMAFT is obsessed with the size of his genitalia. That is a big clue to knowing that we have a male who thinks that women exist for sexual servitude to men.

          Have you noticed how PMAFT only talks about what his women have done for him and not what he has done for his women? That is because PMAFT treats women like domestic servants and sexual servants too.

          I don’t know why his women stay with him. Women don’t care about large genitalia. Feminism still has a long way to go if PMAFT can still get women.

        • Alexis says:
          PMAFT is obsessed with the size of his genitalia.

          I don’t know of too many men obsessed with the size of their genitalia, with the possible exception of porn stars.
          If he ever made any comments about them, it’s likely he was just yanking someone’s chain, maybe yours.

          Have you noticed how PMAFT only talks about what his women have done for him and not what he has done for his women? That is because PMAFT treats women like domestic servants and sexual servants too.

          PMAFT may have noticed that men going out of their way to do things for women doesn’t get them anywhere. At best they’re considered part of the furniture, more often they’re treated with contempt.

          Consider yourself as an example. Do you give even a moment’s thought to the technology and living standards that allow you to use a computer and type obnoxious anti-male messages? Or how about the flush toilet, invented by Thomas Crapper? It may have saved more lives than any other human innovation. These are all male-derived – women’s contributions to the mastery of the physical world are just this side of nonexistent.

          F. Roger Devlin has an article on female psychology which I believe gives some good insights as to why women on the whole aren’t particularly grateful for the aid and protection that men offer them. His conclusion is that men are just too effective at it and women, particularly in first-world countries, just take it for granted. One reason women from third-world countries treat men better is because they understand the value of the protector/provider type of man.

        • “Feminism still has a long way to go if PMAFT can still get women.”

          Ah, so you admit that feminism is all about control of sexual resources. Looks like Schopenbecq was right.

      • Snark says:
        Ah, so you admit that feminism is all about control of sexual resources. Looks like Schopenbecq was right.

        That’s a key insight. The only reason these harpies are up in arms is because bloggers like a certain commenter and PMAFT are predicting an end to sexual scarcity due to technological advances. Because of their hypergamous instincts, they believe only the ‘right’ men deserve to get laid and women should control the sexual landscape. The prospect of Napoleon Dynamite banging a Megan Fox sexbot is enough to make their heads explode. It literally does not compute for them.

      • I also lol’d at this:

        “Women don’t care about large genitalia.”

        Well, yes, we figured out that the whole dick size thing is just a weapon that feminists and other misandist women use against men to, y’know, shame them, make them feel useless and suicidal, and so on.

        But hey … YOU’RE NOT SUPPOSED TO ADMIT THAT, LOL!

        Congrats on destroying your own illusion, idiot!

        • Oh, and … PMAFT’s talk of his huge genitals is clearly delivered in a tongue-in-cheek style.

          Then again, Ferdinand Bardamu already covered that nerds cannot understand nuance, and I believe it was Fidelbogen who commented that the same goes for feminists.

          Just keep taking everything at face value, as if it’s written with utter seriousness … hey, maybe that’s why you’re constantly so offended … nerd.

    • Alexis, you sound frustrated.

      At least when we have sex bots, they won’t endlessly complain and nag like this. They’ll be hotter too.

      Ah, technology! The male invention.

      • At least when we have sex bots, they won’t endlessly complain and nag like this.

        I’ll probably have mine programmed to make false rape accusations,just to add that touch of realism.

  6. Alexis says:
    Make jokes all you want PMAFT but you are a misogynist filled with delusional ideas about male supremacy. I feel so sorry for your girlfriend. Sabrina isn’t it? She doesn’t exist to be your servant or sexual plaything.

    If she isn’t he can always trade her in when sexbot technology comes into its own.

    I don’t care if you think that being tall or having more inches of penis than the average man makes you superior to women. You are everything that is wrong with masculinity.

    What exactly is wrong with masculinity? Guys want to go to bed with hot women. What’s the harm in that?

  7. Summerspeaker says:

    To the contrary, it almost never has this effect. The point is that male supremacy is a global human rights crisis

    Wrong. Male supremacy is what propelled human beings from its status as a minor hominid species (which may have been on the verge of extinction) to the level of a geologic force. All your nattering about women being exploited by men can’t change that.


    and y’all are supporting it to the detriment of more than half the species.

    No, we’re supporting it because it benefits everybody. Go back to rooting in the
    ground for grubs if you don’t like it.

  8. Hot women make up for being women by being hot.
    That is why we flock to them in droves.

  9. […] Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Tech – “I Cause Global Human Rights Crises” […]

  10. Because of their hypergamous instincts, they believe only the ‘right’ men deserve to get laid and women should control the sexual landscape.

    I hold no sympathy whatsoever for this notion. I absolutely oppose using sexuality as means to support hierarchy. You err, however, in identify women as the sex class and treating them as a resource. We’re all people. My worries about sexbots in no way imply opposition to solo sexual satisfaction. I’m fully in favor of masturbation and aids that don’t resemble people and support oppression (such as vibrators).

    • Summerspeaker says:
      You err, however, in identify women as the sex class and treating them as a resource.

      Women themselves treat their sexuality as a resource. As a man, I do not. How could I? Sexbots or virtual reality porn would undercut women’s sexuality as a resource. Therefore you should be supporting my position. Since you don’t, I have concluded that you support using sexual scarcity as a means of controlling men.

      My worries about sexbots in no way imply opposition to solo sexual satisfaction. I’m fully in favor of masturbation and aids that don’t resemble people and support oppression (such as vibrators).

      Please explain the ethical difference between a sexual substitute that doesn’t look human and one that does.

      • Please explain the ethical difference between a sexual substitute that doesn’t look human and one that does.

        The question I want Summerspeaker to answer is what is the ethical difference between a sexual substitute that looks fully human and one that looks like just part of a human. Vibrators and dildos are designed to look like a dick.

        • That’s a good point. I’d also like to know what Summerspeaker thinks of full-immersion VR porn with haptic interfaces. There’s no robotic body to deal with but it would still provide the girlfriend experience to a horny man. Is that Ok with her or just another continuation of the evil patriarchy?

      • Please explain the ethical difference between a sexual substitute that doesn’t look human and one that does.
        Their is none and they damn well know it.
        The only reason they are not against sexual aids that don’t look human is because they can’t ban fleshlights (or other male aids) without also banning vibrators. (Even in such a misandric age as this attempting to ban one and not the other would still be a bit difficult to justify.)

    • “I’m fully in favor of masturbation and aids that don’t resemble people and support oppression (such as vibrators).”

      Vibrators resemble dicks.

      It’s like you’ve thrown the rest of the man away – that’s all.

      They resemble castrated erections.

      And they resemble the notion that the penis is the only part of the man worth keeping around.

      That’s pretty fucking violent, if only symbolically so.

      Sorry, but no dice, vibrators resemble people too. Your argument is weak.

  11. ” I absolutely oppose using sexuality as means to support hierarchy. You err, however, in identify women as the sex class and treating them as a resource. We’re all people. ”
    Feminism 1970: All people are equal.
    Feminism 2010: All people are equal but some are more equal than others.
    Feminism is to socialism what the pigs were to animal farm.

  12. Vibrators don’t necessarily take the form of a phallus and never resemble people. If you confuse a vaguely cock-shaped piece of plastic with a dude, I don’t know what to say to you. The fact that so many sex toys look like dicks should be blamed on the patriarchy if anything, not on feminism.

    Sexbots and pornography, on the other hand, facilitate absurd misogynistic fantasies. In the case of the former, yes, it would be better in as much as it saves real women from such treatment. I doubt we’ll be so lucky.

    For every man who is a real misogynist, there are 10,000 men who pedestalize women.

    The two aren’t mutually exclusive; to the contrary, they come as a package.

    • “Sexbots and pornography, on the other hand, facilitate absurd misogynistic fantasies.”

      Jeeezus! Why do you freaks of womanhood always assume that whenever a guy jacks off he imagines HIMSELF holding the whip?

      Ohhhhh, that’s right! Masochistic men are also misogynists.

      Then I suppose women who enjoy being tied up are all misandrists?

      Ohhhhh, that’s right! Masochistic women are ALSO misogynists.

      What a luke warm sex life you feminists have in store for both men AND women.

    • Vibrators don’t necessarily take the form of a phallus and never resemble people. If you confuse a vaguely cock-shaped piece of plastic with a dude, I don’t know what to say to you

      As said before, they resemble part of a person. Yes, it’s a very schematic version of a penis, but so what. Are men who prefer Anime-style sexbots any less misogynistic than those who want sexbots that look like beautiful women in their prime?

      Sexbots and pornography, on the other hand, facilitate absurd misogynistic fantasies.

      With no due respect, their fantasies are none of your business. You remind me of the nosy neighbor that everyone hates. Get a life instead of worrying that Joe Sixpack is on the verge of having too much fun.

      In the case of the former, yes, it would be better in as much as it saves real women from such treatment. I doubt we’ll be so lucky.

      We’ll see. I predict the opposite – crime will nosedive and Muslim terrorists will stop blowing themselves up if the technology becomes available to them. If they can get those 72 virgins on good ol’ planet Earth instead of having to pass through the gates of paradise, chances are they will. It’ll leave a few rabble-rousers dissatisfied, but that’s life.

      The fact that so many sex toys look like dicks should be blamed on the patriarchy if anything, not on feminism.

      A plastic toy that is sold to women can be blamed on the patriarchy?
      I’ve seen convoluted reasoning before, but that takes the cake.
      How about we resort to a simpler explanation like supply and demand?
      Women want them, manufacturers and retailers deliver them.

      In response to this quote:

      For every man who is a real misogynist, there are 10,000 men who pedestalize women.

      The two aren’t mutually exclusive; to the contrary, they come as a package.

      Wow. So a man who worships women and considers them above criticism is a misogynist. Talk about the snake swallowing its own tail.

    • Tell me, how do you feel about the pocket pussy?

      “Misogynistic”, right? LOL!

      • To the feminist idiot: I see through your lies and I know why you REALLY take the positions you take.

        I have seen ‘earnest’ feminists like you before, attempting to appear reasonable, no matter how convoluted your argument, to our faces …

        … and behind our backs, talking about how you won one over “those fucking pigs,” and so on.

        Your motivation is a very conscious hatred for us, and nothing else. You know full well that’s what it is, and I am not fooled by your cute little charade.

  13. With no due respect, their fantasies are none of your business.

    Porn culture is a society-wide phenomenon not an individual matter. Such male supremacist propaganda and conditioning harms women as a class.

    A plastic toy that is sold to women can be blamed on the patriarchy?

    Yes, that’s how male supremacy works. It’s a dominant narrative nothing exists outside of. That’s the theoretical background for feminists complaining about phallic vibrators and blaming the patriarchy.

    Tell me, how do you feel about the pocket pussy?

    Personally, I find sex toys that resemble organs a little unnerving. But they’re completely different animals from sexbots.

    • HA! Sex toys that resemble organs ‘a little unnerving’, but dildos are fine of course :)

      Here’s my theory, Summerspeaker:

      You will invent, out of thin air, an argument against ANYTHING which allows men to feel sexual fulfillment.

      That’s the crux of this, isn’t it?

      I just want you to ADMIT that you’re a hater. I already know it, I assure you; I just want you to be honest enough, big enough, to say it.

    • Ok, so you admit that dildo’s are unnerving, now can you at least admit that fleshlights are oppressing men so you don’t sound like a hypocrite?

  14. Porn culture is a society-wide phenomenon not an individual matter. Such male supremacist propaganda and conditioning harms women as a class

    It fills a demand for a basic human need. There’s no propaganda and conditioning involved – sexual attraction to women is hardwired into men’s brains. Our species would have died out a long time ago if that weren’t true.

    Yes, that’s how male supremacy works. It’s a dominant narrative nothing exists outside of. That’s the theoretical background for feminists complaining about phallic vibrators and blaming the patriarchy.

    In his book “The Shrinking of America” psychologist Bernie Zilbergeld discussed how mental health professionals form the habit of “psychologizing” the world. In other words, everything is filtered through a therapeutic lens. I think you’re guilty of doing the same thing – you see male supremacy everywhere, even under your own bed. All I can say is, don’t be surprised if you’re written off as batshit crazy.

  15. There is going to be a male demand for alternate sexual release – pornography, prostitution, sexbots, etc. – for as long as women use sex as a weapon against men.

    Why?

    Because men desire sex.

    If women are denying them sex as a tool of coercion, then men will seek it elsewhere.

    This cannot be conditioned out of men. It is a natural drive as powerful as hunger. One way or the other, men will find a way to obtain sexual release. You will never see a society full of beta drones, going about their lives ignoring their impulses; the impulses are too strong to be ignored.

    If women want men to stop using pornography, prostitutes, sex toys, and in the future, sex robots, VR technologies, etc., then the simple answer is to provide what those men are missing in the first place, which makes them seek out alternate forms of sexual release.

  16. “Have you noticed how PMAFT only talks about what his women have done for him and not what he has done for his women? That is because PMAFT treats women like domestic servants and sexual servants too”

    Yeah, I think we’ve already done too much for women as a group as it is. It’s because of us that you have the luxury of running your cocksucking lips,berating us with your tired-ass arguments about why we aren’t allowed to get our nuts off and every method we’ve ever devised to accomplish this is wrong, while the vibrators we designed for you are a-ok.

    Your argument is completely illogical, you contradict it at your own whim any time you need to indict men, and you are probably fat.

    On a sidenote,PMAFT,if you are either or both of these feminist trolls (you crafty alien,you), this has got to be the funniest shit I have ever witnessed. It’s like watching a 4 year old trying to argue the logical basis for the existence of Santa Claus.

    • While creating feminist trolls is not difficult, I have not done so. I don’t see the point of trolling my own blog. Plus one of them has been blogging since January. That’s a lot of work to put into a troll.

      It reminds me of that movie with Jack Nicholson movie where he gets asked how he writes women so well. Jack Nicholson says that he starts with a man and takes away all reason and accountability.

  17. Remember that leftism requires total ideological conformity, especially from exotic darkskinned picturesque savages like myself.

    If that indeed is a requirement, that could explain the current weakness of the left. We couldn’t agree on lunch. Radical feminism exists at the margins currently and utterly lacks the power to enforce any sort of conformity. None of this excuses the misogyny the piece in question.

    Being betrayed by someone who is not a ‘white male Christian creationist red state Hitler monster’ is too much for them to bear.

    I wouldn’t call it betrayal. I consider misogyny the masculine default.

    That is why ‘The Misandry Bubble’ offends them far more than the much harsher writings of Roissy or The Spearhead.

    Who are these people? I suspect I’ll be awfully offend by them as well.

  18. Roissy: http://roissy.wordpress.com/
    The Spearhead: http://www.the-spearhead.com/

    Make sure you have a strong stomach when you visit those sites. They are dens of misogyny and male supremacists.

  19. Do you ever think the problem is with you, for finding so very much in life ‘offensive’?

    You act like “I’m offended!!” is some kind of trump card you can pull in any situation to make people fall into line …

    So let me spell it out for you … NOBODY … AT ALL … cares that you’re offended.

  20. And this site too I found represents the attitudes of the males on those sites:
    http://theracerx.wordpress.com/2010/06/05/women-love-dominance/

  21. They are dens of misogyny and male supremacists.

    Misogyny: n. Anything that is said or done by a male that any particular female does not like.

    You want some misogyny, bitch? Just keep calling us “male supremacists and misogynists” rather than giving us the basic freedoms we’ve been asking for politely for 20 years before this, you’ll get all the misogyny you want, and I believe you do want.

  22. Yeah, those sites looks even worse than “The Misandry Bubble,” as advertised. As they don’t seem connected to futurism or technology, I’m not terribly interested. I could spend my entire life arguing with male supremacists on the internet if I wanted to. I have to be more discriminating than that.

  23. They aren’t usually connected to futurism and technology but they do come up on both of those sites from time to time.

  24. You act like “I’m offended!!” is some kind of trump card you can pull in any situation to make people fall into line …

    To the contrary, it almost never has this effect. The point is that male supremacy is a global human rights crisis and y’all are supporting it to the detriment of more than half the species.

  25. Hey, it’s a zero-sum game. I learned that from you people. So what else do you expect?

Leave a Comment. (Remember the comment policy is in force.)

Cheap Jerseys Wholesale Jerseys Cheap Jerseys Wholesale Jerseys Cheap Jerseys Cheap NFL Jerseys Wholesale Jerseys Wholesale Football Jerseys Wholesale Jerseys Wholesale NFL Jerseys Cheap NFL Jerseys Wholesale NFL Jerseys Cheap NHL Jerseys Wholesale NHL Jerseys Cheap NBA Jerseys Wholesale NBA Jerseys Cheap MLB Jerseys Wholesale MLB Jerseys Cheap College Jerseys Cheap NCAA Jerseys Wholesale College Jerseys Wholesale NCAA Jerseys Cheap Soccer Jerseys Wholesale Soccer Jerseys Cheap Soccer Jerseys Wholesale Soccer Jerseys
Translate »
%d bloggers like this: