I got some new haters recently. The first is “Monica”:

Poor poor baby. Mommy had to spank you because you couldn’t use your diaper. Go have your juice take a nap and Susan and the rest of us readers at HUS might let you come back to the adults table.

The second is “Liz” who made multiple comments:

Grow up little boy. I am sure you hacked the comments at hookingupsmart. That was funny. HA HA HA I couldn’t post for a while. Susan switch to a new system so you little hack job failed.

Mucho fail fail fail like you with women.

Sabrina? New name for your right hand or left hand?

The third is “Diane”:

Oh look. You found a slut with low standards to cater to your filthy desires.

As you can tell “Monica” and “Liz” came here as a result of Susan Walsh’s blog.  ”Diane” probably did so as well, but I can’t tell for sure.  All of them came here days after I was banned from Susan Walsh’s blog.  As Alkibiades put it, that place is a pig sty. I am happy to stay out of it, but Susan Walsh’s readers think they can come over here and post with impunity saying all manner of crap about me.  If I get any more comments from them they automatically go into the moderation queue.  Most likely I will let them through because I am more than happy to give them enough rope to hang themselves.  I’m sure “Monica”, “Liz”, and “Diane” are very angry about this and fail to see their own hypocrisy.  I have no idea where they came up with this BS.  I actually had to check Susan Walsh’s blog to see if she actually accused me of hacking the comments on her blog.  As crazy as Susan is, she isn’t that crazy.  If you really thought I was making up Sabrina (or Kristen or Rachel) then why come here at all, much less post about it?  It doesn’t affect their lives.  What’s really going on is that they want to paint me as a virgin since it’s a disaster of epic proportions if it turns out that a blow job (or several blow jobs) doesn’t cause a man to stop caring about his rights.  It didn’t work on me, and that makes me a threat.  In reality, the amount a man is getting laid doesn’t matter with respect to his understanding of his rights.

Not only are “Monica”, “Liz”, and “Diane” hypocrites, but they’re parasites in a way as well (and probably other ways too).  They can think they can effectively take my work and use it for their purposes, attacking me in this case.  I realized this angle when I was reading the latest post over at Virgin at 50′s blog where he talks about the email he gets.  He describes one of the groups that sends him email as, “Semi-literate rants from feminists, reeking with the stench of sociopathy. With spittle dripping from herpetic encrusted lips, they point a gnarled stump of a finger at me and screech ‘pathetic’ and ‘creepy’”.  Again why are these women bothering?  Some random blog about a 50 year old virgin isn’t going to affect their lives.

He goes on to talk about how women would rather have sex with convicts and homeless men rather than him.  What’s even better is the next thing he says:

I own a business that provides jobs. I created those jobs out of nothing. I know how to create things, build things, and fix things. Without guys like me, females would be shivering in dark, dank caves, wondering why there’s nothing to eat.

Feminists say that I’m pathetic, which is like a tapeworm calling its host pathetic. I say that a society in which females value convicts and the homeless more than they value a man who creates jobs is not only a pathetic society but a dying society.

Let me be the first to spit on its grave.

Be sure to read it a few times so the massive amount of truth sinks in.  There are people out there who act like I’m nuts when I show the connections between socialist policies and the current state of male-female relationships and interaction.  This again gets to the heart of how for many women, they want you (if you’re a man) to go away, but not you’re income stream.  Socialism allows them to attempt to do this so you should be able to see the connection.  In essence its a war on productive men (which itself is a good definition for socialism).

There are those of you out there who will say that the only reason this guy is saying this is because he can’t get laid.  This is code purple shaming language.  Also, I am saying this too, and I am getting laid so that has nothing to do with it.  Even for us men who can get laid plenty we still recognize the problem.  I didn’t stop being productive just because I got laid multiple times.  This is just as much a problem for me as it is for virgin at 50.

This comes from the female attitude that we have heard over and over again, “what’s mine is mine and what’s his is mine”.  Women have scaled this up to the national level too, and that attitude is what we are seeing here whether its through socialist policies to steal wealth from men or through emails and comments on blogs.

11 Responses to “The War on Productive Men”

Comments (8) Pingbacks (3)
  1. He goes on to talk about how women would rather have sex with convicts and homeless men rather than him.

    I just wrote about this. The women of this generation aren’t good enough for guys like him.

  2. newly divorced says:

    I never really thought about it before but it’s really incredible how women view the 50 yo virgin as worse than a homeless man or a criminal. It’s true, in their eyes his being a virgin is worse than being a serial killer.

    This really goes to show how screwed up our society has become and how lost the current generation of women truly is. I can see them reacting in disgust to him, locking their doors etc. much more than with an actual criminal (who they will find attractive)

    Something is really sickly wrong with American women.

  3. Niko says:

    ‘Birds of a feather flock together’, these chicks deserve bums and hoodlums. Guys like Virginat50 are cut from a different cloth, one that can’t be seen with the animal nature, its requires a nous that can transcend its basest nature.

    Goes to show where modern chicks’ natures lie. The bitches be animals.

  4. Barry says:

    You can agree or disagree on this, a modern woman’s nature is manipulation, deception and the lack of common sense.

    if women wanted to be equal, shouldn’t men be receiving alimony. Women with high paying jobs often get alimony. Of which is inhuman.

    Women condemn themselves to a life of nothing. In time, the majority of women would become bitter wrinkly hags.

    To forcibly garnish man’s wage itself is a crime against her brethren.

    I remember the time when men had to sweat and bleed for work. It was required of men to provide for his family. While a woman’s duty was to guide the home.
    Those days are long gone, growing up in small community.
    And women here don’t even know how to pluck a damn goose. Much less hold themselves to standards.
    Now in this day of age, the pooch had been screwed twelve times. Women wield unprecedented advantage over men.
    In addition they would kill their own offspring on a whim.

  5. Days of Broken Arrows says:

    Great post.

    Women who cannot forge cogent aruguemts and rational thoughts resort to insults like “Poor poor baby. Mommy had to spank you because you couldn’t use your diaper.”

    It’s fine if women want to be irrational. The problem is that our media holds these women in high regard and they’re players in our economy. I’m convinced this is one reason American is in the mess it’s in. It’s definitely one reason I’ve refused to work in an office for the past deacde.

    As much as you hear people making a rukus about black-white relations, I saw the immaturity of women as the main problem in the workplace. All of us black, white and Asian guys got along just fine.

  6. LR says:

    God, what a bunch of sick fucks!

    Men created the world and civilization? HAaaa hahahahah.

    Um, you are reproductively cheap, your sperm worthless, and now your offer of “marriages” are hilariously worthless to any woman with what we call “options”.

    Each and every one of you was brought in this world by a woman who was fucking KIND enough to go through the horror of pregnancy, the delivery, and raised you……

    And yet you are SO ungrateful to the fact that women are the only reason civilization ever existed, exists now, and isn’t a war-mongering, sexually hedonistic, worthless nation is because of WOMEN.

    Thank goodness we have abortion now and women will make the SMART choice next time and ABORT the fetuses that come from “misogynistic” and low-value genes!

    (And all of your mothers really should have aborted you since you are clearly so ungrateful and hateful of the people who give you life.)

    See how far you get when women are sick of your shit and refuse to have babies for you.

    Have fun creating Scientifically-Engineered babies to nurse and raise and PAY FOR (since that would be new to most men)…….

    You are angry that women now have a fair playing field and now that we do. You can’t compete.

    Boo-Hoo…..you want empathy? Be a fucking man.

    • Phoenixism says:

      Brings to mind my own birth.
      It was 1964, breech births were a little more daunting then.
      My mom’s Doc, an old school Mexican dude whose bedside manner was one notch more gentle than Dr. Frankensteinn’s, insisted she have me naturally.

      She was in labor for over 24 hours with my upside down ass and still the good Doc would not pump her with drugs and kept telling her to man up (in so many words) and when she finally popped me out, head first, I wasn’t even breathing. They had to spank me forever to jump start me.

      I was brought into this world by misery. I wonder how I’ll leave.

  7. LR says:

    Umm….he’s 40 and a virgin. He’s a loser in every sense of the word and virgins are not popular (at that age) in men OR in women, so please stop deluding yourself here by lying your ass off (and stroking egos) by saying that “women really want a 40 year old virgin?”

    From what I see, you’re the big hypocrite here. I don’t really know what else you have to say and think, but from the few posts I scanned here it isn’t much.

    Are you genuinely going to tell me that you know even ONE woman OR man……who wants to take on a freaking 40-something year old who has not only never had a sexual relationship, but no kids, no relationships at all, no ex-wife, no girlfriend…..

    Welcome to the modern world, dearie. I don’t know a single person who doesn’t think it’s “weird and unattractive” to be a virgin at 20 let alone a virgin at 40!

    Stop stroking your own ego with your retarded post. This man isn’t normal. A virgin is one thing……but a virgin who is 40 and thinks he has options?

    Wow, and you’re the one who talks about the grand delusions of WOMEN? Look at what you just typed, think about what a hypocritical liar you are, and maybe re-word what you said because even if I did agree with everything else you say and think here…..I’d wonder how intellectually honest you are by that comment alone.

    I’m sure you’ll lose your mind over this comment, but I genuinely don’t understand how you could type those words and NOT feel stupid.

    Think about it, who is going to want to give that man KIDS even if he were to marry and have sex? He’s in his forties. What woman is going to want to pop out kids for an inexperienced old guy? Nobody, that’s who. And please don’t say “a young female virgin” because that only happens in movies and old men are just as “off-women’s-radar” as older women are in terms of mating/children.

    I can’t imagine that you’re too stupid to see that simple fact.

Leave a Reply

(required)

(required)

Read This Before Leaving a Comment

All comments must adhere to the comment policy.

     

    Powered by WP Hashcash

    © 2010 Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Technology Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha